『안씨가훈(顔氏家訓)』의 영향과 조선식 가훈(家訓)으로의 변모

Abstract

Through a pedagogical paper, this study aimed to portray the poor intellectual historical flow under the process of transitioning from the importer of Neo-Confucianism (朱子學) to the settling era. The main text was the family motto (家訓), the elementary book, and among them, the pattern of transmission and change in Joseon was examined, focusing on An Ji-chu (顏之推)'s "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan (顔氏家訓)," a bureaucrat during the Northern and Southern Dynasties of China (南北朝時代). The citation pattern of the bibliography was divided into a deliberative method and presented from reference, which is the weakest degree of reference [參], imitation [依] and selection [選] based on the depth of the citation. A previous study found that the life and ideas of the author Ahn Ji-chu, the composition of the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan," pedagogy, and linguistic considerations were comprehensively examined. In addition, a study was conducted to compare "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" and selected Joseon's family motto. However, in an essential sense, there was a relatively insufficient consideration of the aspects in which "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" was imported into Joseon. First, before the subsequent argument, the form and content of the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" that became the framework were classified. Thus, the form was "multi-subject multi-explanation", and the content was hypothesized to be two major categories and five sub-categories. The former included the maintenance and presentation of the family, and the latter included individual perspectives and leisure. Next, through several anthologies and diary materials, it was mentioned that "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" was imported and spread to Joseon around the 16th century. Although there were fewer cases of family honors left than many of the family members, it was noted that among the few families, direct family members left their families simultaneously. It is Park Yong (朴融)'s "Household Discipline (居家誡)" and his great-grandson Park Ha-dam (朴河淡)'s "Ten Articles of Family Motto (家訓十條)". While the change from the "Household Discipline" to the "Ten Articles of Family Motto" is a comparative group that can clearly reveal the changes brought about by the importation of the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan", it does not directly quote from the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan". This is based on the premise that "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" was intentionally excluded because it was accused of being incendiary in addition to its usefulness in edifying customs. This can be resolved by utilizing the reference [參] in an acknowledgment citation (參-依-選). In the transformation of the two, the form was from "mono-subject multi-explanation" to "multi-subject mono-explanation" (family rule), and the content was inherited from "Household discipline," but elements symbolizing "Remarriage," (episode 4) "Encouraging study," (episode 8) and "Taking the hassle out of work" (episode 12) newly emerged. In other words, under the lens of reference, Park Ha-dam's "Ten Articles of Family Motto" clearly reveal an early transformation due to the importation of the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan," and at the same time, it is a family motto with a clearly identified year of compilation (1560). Conversely, among the family mottoes developed differently from "Family mottoes for the Yan Clan," Kang Deok-hoo's "Woogok's a maxim about his child" was examined. In detail, it was noted that "Woogok's a maxim about his child" pointed out "Outline of the Learning of the Sages (聖學輯要)" as the original book in the introduction. The form reflected in "Woogok's a maxim about his child" was "multi-subject multi-explanation". It was confirmed that the content was reflected by focusing on the detailed items of "Outline of the Learning of the Sages" even within the cited catalog, and the element of "managing country (治國)" was excluded. It is presumed that this is a change that occurs in converting into a book aimed at the "Outline of the Learning of the Sages." In addition, there is a difference in that "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" and "Ten Articles of Family Motto" are in the order of the contents of "ordering their States (修身)" and "regulating their families (齊家)", but in "Woogok's a maxim about his child", he chose the opposite route. On the other hand, it is unique that "Woogok's a maxim about his child" took "Outline of the Learning of the Sages" as an example, even though there were several instructions left by Lee Yi (李珥). This being the case, it is quite possible that the decision was made politically to strengthen the Western Party (西人) identity of the Jinju (晉州) Clan following a serious party debate, such as the Yesong (禮訟) controversy and superiority work at the time. In short, the change from "Household Discipline (居家誡)" to "Ten Articles of Family Motto" reflects the aspect of reference [參] from the "Family Mottoes for the Yan Clan" in terms of content and form, and the "Woogok's a maxim about his child" reflects the "Family mottoes for the Yan Clan" as a precedent for family law, This demonstrates the aspect of imitation [依] of "Outline of the Learning of the Sages" in both form and content.