본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How College Students’ Partisanship Affects their Attitudes Toward Political Ads : The Case of the 2012 General Election in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Researchers have typically defined voters’ partisanship as their belonging to a particular party. Alternatively, however, recent researchers have viewed voters’ partisanship as their attitudes toward a party that can range in magnitude. Accordingly, this study examined (1) whether South Korean college students’ attitudes toward political ads can be affected by their attitudes toward the parties and (2) whether the relationship can be moderated by their expectations of the election outcome for the parties and perceived importance of the issues addressed in the ads. Several hypotheses were proposed based on literature review and tested through a survey in the context of the 2012 general election in South Korea. It was found from the test that South Korean college students tended to have positive attitudes toward the political ads of the parties toward which they have positive attitudes as hypothesized. Different from the hypothesis, however, such an impact was not moderated by their expectations of the election outcome, with an exception of those who supported a progressive party but had positive expectations of a conservative party. Lastly, the hypothesis that the impact would be moderated by their importance perception of the issues addressed in the political ads showed a mixed outcome. Based on the result, suggestions were made for more effective use of political ads and future studies.

Abstract

Researchers have typically defined voters’ partisanship as their belonging to a particular party. Alternatively, however, recent researchers have viewed voters’ partisanship as their attitudes toward a party that can range in magnitude. Accordingly, this study examined (1) whether South Korean college students’ attitudes toward political ads can be affected by their attitudes toward the parties and (2) whether the relationship can be moderated by their expectations of the election outcome for the parties and perceived importance of the issues addressed in the ads. Several hypotheses were proposed based on literature review and tested through a survey in the context of the 2012 general election in South Korea. It was found from the test that South Korean college students tended to have positive attitudes toward the political ads of the parties toward which they have positive attitudes as hypothesized. Different from the hypothesis, however, such an impact was not moderated by their expectations of the election outcome, with an exception of those who supported a progressive party but had positive expectations of a conservative party. Lastly, the hypothesis that the impact would be moderated by their importance perception of the issues addressed in the political ads showed a mixed outcome. Based on the result, suggestions were made for more effective use of political ads and future studies.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Alesina, A., "Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters", American Economic Review, 78, pp.796~805 (1988)
  2. Allport, G. W., "A handbook of social psychology", pp.798~844 (1935), Clark University Press
  3. Ansolabehere, S., "Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate" (1995), Free Press
  4. Babad, E., "Wish and reality in voters’ predictions of election outcomes", Political Psychology, 14(1), pp.37~54 (1993)
  5. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy : Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977)
  6. Belanger, E., "Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice", Electoral Studies, 27, pp.477~491 (2008)
  7. Belknap, G., "Political party identification and attitudes toward foreign policy", Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), pp.601~623 (1952)
  8. Budge, I., "Explaining and predicting elections : Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies" (1983), Allen & Unwin
  9. Campbell, A., "The voter decides" (1954), Row, Peterson and Company
  10. Cappella, J. N., "Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good" (1997), Oxford University Press
  11. Chang, C., "Party bias in political-advertising processing", Journal of Advertising, 52(2), pp.55~67 (2003)
  12. Craig, S. C., "Political efficacy and trust : a report on the NES pilot study items", Political Behavior, 12(3), pp.289~314 (1990)
  13. Finkel, S. E., "Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy : a panel analysis", American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), pp.891~913 (1985)
  14. Finkel, S. E., "Reexamining the"Minimal Effects"model in recent presidential campaigns", The Journal of Politics, 55(1), pp.1~21 (1993)
  15. Gawronski, B., "On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency : Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, pp.535~542 (2004)
  16. Greene, S., "Understanding party identification : A social identity approach", Political Psychology, 20(2), pp.393~403 (1999)
  17. Greene, S., "The social-psychological measurement of partisanship", Political Behavior, 24(3), pp.171~197 (2002)
  18. Jones, R. A., "Self-fulfilling prophecies" (1977), Erlbaum
  19. Kaid, L. L., "Political advertising in the 2004 election : Comparison of traditional television and Internet messages", The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), pp.265~278 (2005)
  20. Kaid, L. L., "Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: candidate, media, and public voices" (2000), Hampton
  21. Kaid, L. L., "The effects of political advertising on young voters", American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), pp.1137~1151 (2007)
  22. 김관규, "대학생유권자의 미디어 이용과 투표 행동 : 2008년 제18대 총선을 대상으로", 언론과학연구, 8(4), pp.187~221 (2008), 한국지역언론학회
  23. Kruglanski, A., "Lay epistemologic process and contents", Psychological Review, 87, pp.70~87 (1980)
  24. Lazarsfeld, P., "Contributions in the language of social research" (1946), Free Press
  25. Lee, S., "The assertive nationalism of South Korean youth : Cultural dynamism and political activism", SAIS Review, 26(2), pp.123~132 (2006)
  26. 이수범, "17대 총선의 후보자 정치 광고에 관한 연구", 홍보학연구, 9(1), pp.102~125 (2005), 한국PR학회
  27. Lijphart, A., "Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries" (1999), Yale University Press
  28. Lord, C. G., "Biased assimilation and attitude polarization : The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp.2098~2109 (1979)
  29. Miller, W. E., "The new American voter" (1996), Harvard University Press
  30. 민영, "정치광고의 이슈현저성과 후보자 선호도에 대한 효과 : 이슈소유권(issue ownership)과 네거티브 소구(negative appeals)를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 50(5), pp.108~131 (2006), 한국언론학회
  31. "Report: young voters, candidates share blame for apathy" (2000)[URL]
  32. 박상호, "미디어 신뢰도가 정치효능감과 투표행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 대학생의 정치참여행위를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 49(4), pp.110~135 (2005), 한국언론학회
  33. Petrocik, J. R., "Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study", American Journal of Political Science, 40, pp.825~850 (1996)
  34. Rosema, M., "Partisanship, candidate evaluations, ad prospective voting", Electoral Studies, 25, pp.467~488 (2006)
  35. Ross, L., "The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, pp.279~301 (1977)
  36. 신일기, "네거티브 정치광고의 유형과 광고 회의주의가 스폰서 후보 평가 및 투표의도에 미치는 영향", 한국광고홍보학보, 10(3), pp.224~247 (2008), 한국광고홍보학회
  37. Tajfel, H., "Differentiation between social groups", pp.20~30 (1978), Academic Press
  38. Tajfel, H., "Psychology of intergroup relations", pp.7~24 (1986), Nelson-Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)