본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

요한복음 20:31의 ‘이것’(tau/ta)

“These” in John 20:30-31

6

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Fourth Evangelist disclosed his goal of writing and his approach for reaching that goal at the conclusion of the Gospel (John 20:30-31). His goal of writing is to lead readers to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, Christ. For reaching this goal, the Evangelist wrote ‘these’(20:31) in his Gospel. Then to what does the pronoun ‘these’ refer? It is a general understanding among commen- tators that the pronoun ‘these’ in 20:31 refers to Jesus' miracles recorded in the first half of the Gospel (chaps. 1-12). This general understanding is mostly based on emphasis of ‘sign’ aspect of the term smeion in 20:30. This paper argues that the Fourth Evangelist intended that the pronoun ‘these’ in 20:31 not only refers to Jesus' miracles in chapters 1-12 but to Jesus' resurrection in chapter 20 by clarifying the concept of the smeion in 20:30. The term smeion does not have a sense of ‘sign,’ but ‘miracle.’ From this perspective, Jesus' resurre- ction should be included in the scope of ‘these’ because Jesus' resurrection is surely a miracle. This thesis is also supported by other two evidences: (1) Jesus called his resurrection as smeion in the temple-cleansing narrative (2:13-22); (2) the pattern that Jesus’ smeion evokes people’s faith is found in the account of his resurrection. Therefore, it can be said that the pronoun ‘these’ refers to Jesus' resurrection in chapter 20 as well as seven miracles in the first half of the Gospel.

Abstract

The Fourth Evangelist disclosed his goal of writing and his approach for reaching that goal at the conclusion of the Gospel (John 20:30-31). His goal of writing is to lead readers to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, Christ. For reaching this goal, the Evangelist wrote ‘these’(20:31) in his Gospel. Then to what does the pronoun ‘these’ refer? It is a general understanding among commen- tators that the pronoun ‘these’ in 20:31 refers to Jesus' miracles recorded in the first half of the Gospel (chaps. 1-12). This general understanding is mostly based on emphasis of ‘sign’ aspect of the term smeion in 20:30. This paper argues that the Fourth Evangelist intended that the pronoun ‘these’ in 20:31 not only refers to Jesus' miracles in chapters 1-12 but to Jesus' resurrection in chapter 20 by clarifying the concept of the smeion in 20:30. The term smeion does not have a sense of ‘sign,’ but ‘miracle.’ From this perspective, Jesus' resurre- ction should be included in the scope of ‘these’ because Jesus' resurrection is surely a miracle. This thesis is also supported by other two evidences: (1) Jesus called his resurrection as smeion in the temple-cleansing narrative (2:13-22); (2) the pattern that Jesus’ smeion evokes people’s faith is found in the account of his resurrection. Therefore, it can be said that the pronoun ‘these’ refers to Jesus' resurrection in chapter 20 as well as seven miracles in the first half of the Gospel.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. E.C. Hoskyns, "The Fourth Gospel" (1954), Faber & Faber
  2. P.S. Minear, "The Original Functions of John 21", JBL, 102, pp.85~98 (1983)
  3. Gail R. O’Day, "The Gospel of John: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections" (1995), Abingdon Press
  4. J. Ramsey Michaels, "John" (1989), Hendrickson
  5. John Ashton, "Understanding the Fourth Gospel" (1991), Clarendon Press
  6. Leon Morris, "The Gospel According to John" (1995), Eerdmans
  7. Merrill C. Tenney, "John: The Gospel of Belief" (1948), Eerdmans
  8. Rudolf Schnackenburg, "The Gospel accor- ding to St. John" (1982), Burns & Oates
  9. Raymond E. Brown, "The Gospel according to John", pp.2~ (1970), Doubleday
  10. George R. Beasley-Murray, "John", pp.387~ (1999), Thomas Nelson
  11. C.K. Barrett, "The Gospel according to St. John", pp.75~78 (1978), SPCK
  12. D.A. Carson, "The Gospel according to John", pp.661~ (1991), Eerdmans
  13. Graham H. Twelftree, "Jesus the Miracle Worker: A Historical and Theolo- gical Study", pp.225~ (1999), InterVarsity Press
  14. Craig S. Keener, "The Gospel of John" (2003), Hendrickson
  15. Donald Guthrie, "The Importance of Signs in the Fourth Gospel", Vox Evangelica, 5, pp.72~83 (1967)
  16. C.H. Dodd, "The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel", pp.141~ (1954), Cambridge University Press
  17. Andreas J. Ko¨stenberger, "The Seventh Johan- nine Sign: A Study on John's Christology", BBR, 5, pp.87~103 (1995)
  18. Udo Schnelle, "Antidocetic Christology in the Gospel of John", pp.139~ (1992), Fortress Press
  19. Peter Riga, "Signs of Glory, The Use of seˉmeion in St. John’s Gospel", Interpretation, 17, pp.402~424 (1963)
  20. Rudolf Bultmann, "The Gospel of John", pp.698~ (1971), Blackwell
  21. Gilbert van Belle, "The Meaning of SHMEIA in John 20:30-31", Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 74, pp.300~325 (1998)
  22. J.L. Martyn, "History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel" (1979), Abingdon
  23. Andrew T. Lincoln, "Truth on Trial: The Lawsuit Motif in John's Gospel" (2000), Hendrickson
  24. Gerald L. Borchert, "John 1-11", pp.153~ (1996), Broadman & Holman
  25. Barnabas Lindars, "The Gospel of John", pp.123~ (1972), Oliphants
  26. Robert Kysar, "The Fourth Evangelist and His Gospel", pp.24~ (1975), Augus- burg Pub House
  27. W.D. Davies, "The Johannine Signs of Jesus in: A Companion to John: Readings in Johannine Theology", pp.95~ (1977), Alba
  28. Leon Morris, "The Relation of the Signs and the Discourses in John in: The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke", 366~
  29. Harold Remus, "Jesus as Healer", pp.75~ (1997), Cambridge University Press
  30. Sungjin Bae, "Jesus’ Resurrection as the Climactic Seˉmeion in the Fourth Gospel", 박사, pp.2008
  31. James Barr, "The Semantics of Biblical Language", pp.218~ (1961), Oxford University
  32. Moise's Silva, "Biblical Words and Their Meaning: An Intro- duction to Lexical Semantics", pp.25~26 (1983), Zondervan
  33. rant R. Osborne, "The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation", pp.66~ (1991), InterVarsity
  34. J.P. Louw, "Semantics of New Testament Greek", pp.35~36 (1982), Fortress Press
  35. Dan McCartney, "Let the Reader Understand", pp.143~ (2002), P&R Publishing
  36. Kenneth A. Mathews, "John, Jesus and the Essenes", Criswell Theological Review, 3, pp.120~121 (1998)
  37. Craig A. Evans, "Jesus’ Action in the Temple: Cleansing or Portent of Destruction?", Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 51, pp.254~256 (1989)
  38. Richard H. Hiers, "Purification of the Temple: Preparation for the Kingdom of God", Journal of Biblical Literature, 90, pp.87~88 (1971)
  39. Werner Georg Ku¨mmel, "Promise and Fulfillment: Eschatological Message of Jesus", pp.117~118 (1957), Allenson
  40. Alan R. Kerr, "The Temple of Jesus’ Body: The Temple Theme in the Gospel of John", pp.73~74 (2002), Sheffield Academic Press
  41. Wolfgang J. Bittner, "Jesu Zeichen im Johannesevangelium: Die Messias- Erkenntnis im Johannesevangelium vor ihrem ju¨dischen Hinterground", pp.115~ (1987), J.C.B. Mohr
  42. F.F. Bruce, "The Gospel of John", pp.135~ (1983), Eerdmans

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)