본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가연구개발사업 관리자의 성과정보 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인

Factors Shaping Managers’ Use of Performance Information in National R&D Programs

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

정부는 국가연구개발사업 성과평가가 ‘평가를 위한 평가’가 아닌 사업 개선과 성과 제고에 기여하도록 하는 방안을 모색하고 있다. 이에 연구관리 현장에서 성과정보의 활용을 지원할 필요가 있으며, 이를 위해 조직 내부의 성과정보 활용 메커니즘을 이해하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구는 성과정보의 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 이해관계자의 참여에 주목하였고, 이해관계자참여가 성과정보의 품질에 대한 인식을 제고함으로써 성과정보의 활용을 증가시키는 매개효과모형을 설정하였다. 실증분석을 위하여 과학기술정책연구원에서 수행한 ‘R&D 성과평가 정보활용 실태조사(2022년)’ 결과를 활용하였으며, 3단계 다중회귀분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 이해관계자의 참여는 이해 및 개선 목적의 성과정보 활용에 직접적인 영향을 미칠 뿐만 아니라성과정보의 품질에 대한 인식 제고를 통해 간접적인 영향도 미친다는 점을 확인하였다. 이는R&D분야 성과정보 활용과 관련한 이론적, 정책적 시사점을 제공한다.

Abstract

The government is seeking ways to ensure that performance evaluations of national R&D programs contribute to program improvement and enhanced outcomes, rather than being mere "evaluations for evaluation's sake." Therefore, it is necessary to support the use of performance information in research management, and understanding the mechanisms for using performance information within organizations is essential. This study focuses on stakeholder involvement as a factor affecting the use of performance information, and establishes a mediation model where stakeholder participation enhances the perception of the quality of performance information, thereby increasing its utilization. For empirical analysis, the study uses data from the "Survey on the Utilization of R&D Performance Evaluation Information (2022)" conducted by the Science and Technology Policy Institute, and performs a three-step multiple regression analysis. The analysis results confirms that stakeholder involvement not only directly affects the use of performance information for understanding and improvement purposes, but also indirectly affects it by enhancing the perception of the quality of performance information. This provides theoretical and policy implications for the use of performance information in the R&D field.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 2023년 연구관리 전문기관 지정・운영에 대한 실태조사・분석 결과(안), "과학기술정보통신부", ~ (2023)
  2. 박해육, "성과정보 활용의 영향요인에 관한 실증분석", 지방행정연구, 27(3), pp.353~384 (2013)
  3. 우리나라 정부성과평가제도에 대한 메타평가 연구, "오영민", 한국조세재정연구원, ~ (2017)
  4. R&D 성과평가 정보 활용 실태 및 활성화 방안, "유나리", 과학기술정책연구원, ~ (2022)
  5. 평가 결과 및 성과정보의 활용도 제고 방안, "이광희", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2013)
  6. Alkin, M., "Unbundling evaluation use", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
  7. Andersen, S., "Learning from performance information", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), pp.415~431 (2020)
  8. Baron, R., "The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations", Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~ (1986)
  9. Behn, R., "Why measure performance?", Public Administration Review, 63(5), pp.586~607 (2003)
  10. Bourdeaux, C., "Legislative influences on performance management reform", Public Administration Review, 68(2), pp.253~265 (2008)
  11. de Lancer Julnes, P, "Performance Information in the Public Sector. Governance and Public Management Series" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  12. de Lancer Julnes, P., "Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations : An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation", Public Administration Review, 61(6), pp.693~708 (2001)
  13. Favero, N., "Goals, trust, participation, and feedback : Linking internal management with performance outcomes", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), pp.327~343 (2016)
  14. Fernandez, S., "Managing successful organizational change in the public sector", Public Administration Review, 66(2), pp.168~176 (2006)
  15. Forss, K., "Process use of evaluations : Types of use that precede lessons learned and feedback", Evaluation, 8(1), pp.29~45 (2002)
  16. Han, X., "Does managerial use of performance information matter to organizational outcomes?", The American Review of Public Administration, 52(2), pp.109~122 (2022)
  17. Hatry, H., "Performance Measurement : Getting Results" (1999), Urban Institute Press
  18. Hatry, H., "Transforming performance measurement for the 21st century" (2014), Urban Institute Press
  19. Heinrich, C, "Evidence-based policy and performance management : Challenges and prospects in two parallel movements", American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), pp.255~277 (2007)
  20. Ho, A, "Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of midwestern mayors", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), pp.217~237 (2006)
  21. Ho, A., "Citizen-initiated performance assessment : The initial Iowa experience", Public Performance & Management Review, 27(3), pp.29~50 (2004)
  22. Holzer, M., "Performance measurement and improvement : An assessment of the state of the art", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(1), pp.15~31 (2004)
  23. Hood, C., "A public management for all seasons?", Public Administration, 69(1), pp.3~19 (1991)
  24. Kroll, A, "Drivers of performance information use : Systematic literature review and directions for future research", Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), pp.459~486 (2015)
  25. Kroll, A, "Explaining the use of performance information by public managers : A planned-behavior approach", American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), pp.201~215 (2015)
  26. Kroll, A., "Controlling the control system : performance information in the German childcare administration", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), pp.74~85 (2013)
  27. Larson Jr, J, "The performance feedback process : A preliminary model", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1), pp.42~76 (1984)
  28. Moynihan, D., "Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “managing for results” reforms?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), pp.219~243 (2005)
  29. Moynihan, D., "The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform" (2008), Georgetown University Press
  30. Moynihan, D., "Integrative leadership in the public sector : A model of performance-information use", Administration & Society, 36(4), pp.427~453 (2004)
  31. Moynihan, D., "Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act", Public Administration Review, 76(2), pp.314~323 (2016)
  32. Moynihan, D., "Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART", Public Administration Review, 72(4), pp.592~602 (2012)
  33. Moynihan, D., "The big question for performance management:Why do managers use performance information?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), pp.849~866 (2010)
  34. Naff, K., "To look like America: Dismantling barriers for women and minorities in government" (2001), Routledge
  35. Patton, M., "Utilization-Focused Evaluation" (1997), Sage Publications
  36. Poister, T., "The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance", Public Administration Review, 70, pp.s246~s254 (2010)
  37. Pollitt, C., "Performance information for democracy: The missing link?", Evaluation, 12(1), pp.38~55 (2006)
  38. Preacher, K., "Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models", Behavior research methods, 40(3), pp.879~891 (2008)
  39. Radin, B., "Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values" (2006), Georgetown University Press
  40. Ter Bogt, H, "Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen's use of performance information", Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), pp.221~252 (2004)
  41. U.S. GAO(Government Accountability Office)., "Managing For Results: Enhancing Agency Use of Performance Information for Management Decision Making", ~ (2005)
  42. Van de Walle, S., "Making better use of information to drive improvement in local public services: A report for the Audit Commission" (2007), University of Birmingham
  43. Van Dooren, W, "Performance management in the public sector" (2015), Routledge
  44. Van Wart, M, "Public-sector leadership theory : An assessment", Public Administration Review, 63(2), pp.214~228 (2003)
  45. Weiss, C, "The many meanings of research utilization", Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp.426~431 (1979)
  46. Yang, K., "Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement : Testing a middle-range model", Public Administration Review, 67(5), pp.861~879 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)