본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

긴급체포의 규정과 운용에 대한 비판적 고찰

A Critical Study on Regulation and Application of Emergency Arrest

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Emergency arrest is an exceptional judicial system with which the investigation agency can arrest a suspect without issue of writ under the condition that there are good reasons that the suspect deserves death penalty, life imprisonment, over three-year prison sentence or imprisonment and that the necessity of arrest and the urgency are approved. First of all, the requirements and procedures of emergency arrests have been studied. Then, the current applications of emergency arrests have been reviewed. While reviewing these, considering the real situation that most criminal law and criminal special laws consist of crimes deserving death penalty, life imprisonment, over three-year prison sentence or imprisonment,I have suggested that the minimum penalty should be increased to recognize the gravity and the exception of emergency arrest. Also, regarding the reasonability of criminal charges, a differentiation between the arrest and the detention should be made and the necessity and urgency of the arrest should be considered comprehensively, so emergency arrest should not be used as a tool of avoiding an arrestment with issue of writ Together with this, I have maintained that for a judicial court to induce an arrest by means of issue of writ, a court’s issuing an arrest warrant without special care should be checked. In order to achieve this, the judgement on requirements of emergency arrest should be made more strictly with considering an investigation agency’s decisions. So far, the main issues of emergency arrest have been reviewed through this article. The main agent of emergency arrest is limited to a prosecutor and a judicial police officer in criminal procedure law but considering the reality of investigation, judicial assistant official should be included. I strongly urge that through Constitution, an arrest warrant system after emergency arrest should be introduced and unnecessary imprisonment of humans should be controled in terms of not only the time of requesting detention warrant but also the time of issuing detention warrant, with the help of stipulation of criminal procedure law.

Abstract

Emergency arrest is an exceptional judicial system with which the investigation agency can arrest a suspect without issue of writ under the condition that there are good reasons that the suspect deserves death penalty, life imprisonment, over three-year prison sentence or imprisonment and that the necessity of arrest and the urgency are approved. First of all, the requirements and procedures of emergency arrests have been studied. Then, the current applications of emergency arrests have been reviewed. While reviewing these, considering the real situation that most criminal law and criminal special laws consist of crimes deserving death penalty, life imprisonment, over three-year prison sentence or imprisonment,I have suggested that the minimum penalty should be increased to recognize the gravity and the exception of emergency arrest. Also, regarding the reasonability of criminal charges, a differentiation between the arrest and the detention should be made and the necessity and urgency of the arrest should be considered comprehensively, so emergency arrest should not be used as a tool of avoiding an arrestment with issue of writ Together with this, I have maintained that for a judicial court to induce an arrest by means of issue of writ, a court’s issuing an arrest warrant without special care should be checked. In order to achieve this, the judgement on requirements of emergency arrest should be made more strictly with considering an investigation agency’s decisions. So far, the main issues of emergency arrest have been reviewed through this article. The main agent of emergency arrest is limited to a prosecutor and a judicial police officer in criminal procedure law but considering the reality of investigation, judicial assistant official should be included. I strongly urge that through Constitution, an arrest warrant system after emergency arrest should be introduced and unnecessary imprisonment of humans should be controled in terms of not only the time of requesting detention warrant but also the time of issuing detention warrant, with the help of stipulation of criminal procedure law.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), 성균관대 출판부
  2. 배종대, "신형사소송법 제3판" (2011), 홍문사
  3. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2011), 법문사
  4. 손동권, "형사소송법 개정신판" (2010), 세창출판사
  5. 신동운, "신형사소송법 제3판" (2011), 법문사
  6. 신양균, "형사소송법" (2010), 화산미디어
  7. 신현주, "형사소송법" (1999), 박영사
  8. 안성수, "형사소송법" (2009), 박영사
  9. 위재민, "형사절차법", 한국표준협회미디어, ~ (2010)
  10. 이영란, "한국형사소송법" (2008), 나남
  11. 이완규, "형사소송법연구 I" (2008), 탐구사
  12. 이은모, "형사소송법" (2011), 박영사
  13. 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2011), 박영사
  14. 임동규, "형사소송법" (2011), 법문사
  15. 정웅석, "형사소송법" (2011), 대명출판사
  16. 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2011), 박영사
  17. 차용석, "형사소송법" (2008), 21세기사
  18. 허영, "한국헌법론" (2011), 박영사
  19. 범죄분석 (2003-2011), "대검찰청", ~ (2011)
  20. 법무부, "일본 형사소송법⋅규칙", ~ (2009)
  21. 법원행정처, (2008)
  22. 법원행정처, "사법연감(2000-2011)", ~ (2011)
  23. 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설", ~ (2007)
  24. 三井誠, "입문 일본형사수속법" (2003), 법문사
  25. 김상호, "긴급체포의 명칭과 요건상의 대상범죄에 대한 검토", 동아법학, (47), pp.241~264 (2010), 법학연구소
  26. 김준성, "형사소송법상 긴급체포제도에 관한 재검토", 형사법연구, 23(3), pp.207~230 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  27. 류지영, "긴급체포제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사법연구, (20), pp.277~296 (2003), 한국형사법학회
  28. 박종환, "긴급체포제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학연구, 17 (2000), 원광대 법학연구소
  29. 변종필, "구속제도의 이론과 실제", 형사정책연구, 21(2), pp.43~81 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
  30. 양문상, "현행 형사소송법상 체포제도에 대한 검토", 법학연구, 20(2), pp.151~182 (2009), 법학연구소
  31. 이경재, "개정 형사소송법상 인신구속제도에 관한 고찰", 형사법연구, 19(4), pp.3~22 (2007), 한국형사법학회
  32. 이상민, (2010), 박영사
  33. 이완규, "수사기관의 긴급처분과 영장주의", 형사법과 헌법이념, 2 (2007), 공법연구회
  34. 이은모, "피의자 인신구속제도의 정비방안", 형사법연구, (19), pp.109~134 (2003), 한국형사법학회
  35. 이호중, "형사절차와 인권", 한양법학, 19 (2006), 한양법학회
  36. 전승수, "개정 형사소송법상 구속제도", 법조, 57(2), pp.31~68 (2008), 법조협회
  37. 정동기, "체포영장제도 도입에 관하여", 법조, 통권 : 456 (1994), 법조협회
  38. 조국, "긴급체포의 전단계로 남용되는 불법적 임의수사에 대한 통제", 형사판례연구, 15 (2007), 한국형사판례연구회
  39. 최교일, "긴급체포에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, 통권 : 51 (1999), 한국법학원
  40. 하태인, "수사상 긴급체포 요건과 운용", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.285~308 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  41. 하태훈, "한국형사법학회 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 논평 - 수사 일반과 강제처분 부분 -", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.3~26 (2011), 한국형사법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)