공익사업을 위한 토지 등의 취득과 그 손실보상에 있어 행정형 대체적 분쟁해결제도 연구
The study on ‘administrative’ alternative dispute resolutionsin the acquisition of land etc. for public works and the compensatio
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
「Act on the Acquisition of Land etc. for Public Works and the Compensation」 stipulates the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise by the land commission as ‘administrative’ alternative dispute resolutions in the acquisition of land etc. for public works and the compensation. But the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise are not widely used on account of ambiguous provisions related to each resolution. If the business operator, landowners and the parties concerned accept the recommendation of compromise, the land commission makes the compromise protocol. Ambiguous provisions related to the legal effects of the compromise protocol arouse the controversy about the practical benefit of the recommendation of compromise. It is necessary to amend the provisions related to the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise to make plain the procedures and the legal effects. Especially, I suggest to give landowners and the parties concerned the rights to request the confirmation of reaching agreements. I don’t think there is any substantial reason to invest only business operators with the rights to request the confirmation. It is reasonable to let the land commission itself(not a subcommittee) recommend compromise to the business operator,landowners and the parties concerned. And the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise are used after the notification of the public utility authorization. It is necessary to adopt administrative alternative dispute resolutions before the notification of the public utility authorization, such as arbitration and conciliation. Through this research, I hope the discussions on the related issues would be more active.
Abstract
「Act on the Acquisition of Land etc. for Public Works and the Compensation」 stipulates the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise by the land commission as ‘administrative’ alternative dispute resolutions in the acquisition of land etc. for public works and the compensation. But the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise are not widely used on account of ambiguous provisions related to each resolution. If the business operator, landowners and the parties concerned accept the recommendation of compromise, the land commission makes the compromise protocol. Ambiguous provisions related to the legal effects of the compromise protocol arouse the controversy about the practical benefit of the recommendation of compromise. It is necessary to amend the provisions related to the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise to make plain the procedures and the legal effects. Especially, I suggest to give landowners and the parties concerned the rights to request the confirmation of reaching agreements. I don’t think there is any substantial reason to invest only business operators with the rights to request the confirmation. It is reasonable to let the land commission itself(not a subcommittee) recommend compromise to the business operator,landowners and the parties concerned. And the confirmation of reaching agreements and the recommendation of compromise are used after the notification of the public utility authorization. It is necessary to adopt administrative alternative dispute resolutions before the notification of the public utility authorization, such as arbitration and conciliation. Through this research, I hope the discussions on the related issues would be more active.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ 제16판" (2012), 법문사
- 석종현, "일반행정법(상) 제13판" (2011), 삼영사
- 이선영, "신토지수용과 보상법론 제2판" (2008), 도서출판 리북스
- 한국감정원 부동산연구소, "(해설)토지보상법", 한국감정원, ~ (2003)
- Alfred C. Aman Jr., "Administrative Law" (1993), WestPublishing
- 大橋眞由美, "行政紛爭解決の現代的 構造" (2005), 弘文堂
- 김남진, "준법률행위적 행정행위의 문제점-그의 해체를 주장하며-", 고시연구, 19(5)
- 김남진, "행정소송상의 화해 및 조정", 법률신문 제3436, ~
- 김유환, "법원에서의 행정사건에 대한 재판외 분쟁해결제도, In 현대공법학의 과제 : 청담 최송화 교수 화갑기념" (2002)
- 박정훈, "행정소송에 있어 소송상 화해", 인권과 정의, (279) (1999)
- 박평준, "공용수용의 절차(Ⅲ)-협의를 중심으로-", 사법행정, 45(12) (2004)
- 박평준, "공용수용의 절차(Ⅳ)-재결ㆍ화해를 중심으로-", 사법행정, 46(1) (2005)
- 석종현, "土地補償法上 事業認定에 관한 檢討", 토지공법연구, 27, pp.151~167 (2005), 한국토지공법학회
- 정기상, "수용절차상 재결신청청구제도에 관한 연구", 인권과 정의, (428), pp.39~57 (2012), 대한변호사협회
- 정남철, "대체적 분쟁해결수단으로서 행정소송에서의 조정", 사법행정, 46(4) (2005)
- 정남철, "행정형 ADR과 언론조정ㆍ중재제도", 언론중재, 30(4) (2010)
- 함영주, "우리 법제하 행정형 ADR의 현황과 과제", 언론중재, 29(1) (2009)
- 호문혁, "判決과 ADR 體系의 正立에 관한 연구", 서울대학교 법학, 53(1), pp.571~599 (2012), 법학연구소
- 홍광식, "수리행위에 관한 약간의 연구", 사법연구자료, 22 (1995)
