자녀를 위한 무수혈 치료법의 선택과 친권의 범위 -서울동부지방법원 2010.10.21.자 2010카합2341 결정-
The Choice of Bloodless Medical Treatment for Children and the Boundary of Rights and Duties of Parents
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In seeking professional medical treatment, it falls into the realm of parental rights and duties that they delegate the cure of their underage children’s ailment to medical professionals as an act to protect their children’s health. However, underage children do not have natural insight and the capability to express their decision whether or not to get medical treatment. In this case, the parents who hold the rights and duties to protect their children seek medical treatment and as the medical professionals suggest the parents agree to get treatment. In this case of agreement, the right to self-determination is based on personal right, therefore parents are not the delegates exercising the rights of their children but their right to agreement derives from their rights as parents. In this case, the question arises “whether it falls in the boundary of the rights and duties of parents when they seek bloodless surgery for their children’s medical treatment.” Clearly parents have the rights and duties to consider or distinguish the positive elements and also the negative in regard to their children’s physical and mental benefits when a medical treatment is given to them. Therefore, following factors should be reviewed: whether there are negative factors regarding blood transfusion, what kinds of bloodless heart surgeries some parents request are currently conducted on newborns. Then it could further help us and those examining the parental legal rights and duties to understand better the parents of strong religious belief.
Abstract
In seeking professional medical treatment, it falls into the realm of parental rights and duties that they delegate the cure of their underage children’s ailment to medical professionals as an act to protect their children’s health. However, underage children do not have natural insight and the capability to express their decision whether or not to get medical treatment. In this case, the parents who hold the rights and duties to protect their children seek medical treatment and as the medical professionals suggest the parents agree to get treatment. In this case of agreement, the right to self-determination is based on personal right, therefore parents are not the delegates exercising the rights of their children but their right to agreement derives from their rights as parents. In this case, the question arises “whether it falls in the boundary of the rights and duties of parents when they seek bloodless surgery for their children’s medical treatment.” Clearly parents have the rights and duties to consider or distinguish the positive elements and also the negative in regard to their children’s physical and mental benefits when a medical treatment is given to them. Therefore, following factors should be reviewed: whether there are negative factors regarding blood transfusion, what kinds of bloodless heart surgeries some parents request are currently conducted on newborns. Then it could further help us and those examining the parental legal rights and duties to understand better the parents of strong religious belief.
참고문헌 (28)
- 강동세, "수혈로 인한 후천성면역결핍증(AIDS) 감염에 따른 법적 문제에 관한 연구", 법조, 46(8) (1997)
- 권영준, "의사의 진료과오로 인한 민사책임, In 동국대학교대학원 연구논집" (1978)
- 김민중, "의료계약의 당사자로서의 ｢환자｣와 관련한 문제에 대한 검토", 의료법학, 10(2), pp.253~286 (2009), 대한의료법학회
- 김승년, "의료과오에 대한 손해배상책임, In 현대민법론" (1982), 고시원
- 김용한, "의료행위에 의한 책임", 법조, 32(6) (1983)
- 김웅한, "신생아와 유아 심장 수술 시 심폐기회로 충진액의 최소화", The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 42(4), pp.418~425 (2009), 대한흉부외과학회
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2011), 법문사
- 문현호, "혈액제제 제조물책임 소송과 증명책임 - 대법원 2011. 9. 29. 선고 2008다16776 판결과 관련하여", 의료법학, 12(2), pp.65~117 (2011), 대한의료법학회
- 서광민, "의료과오책임의 법적 구성", 민사법학, (8) (1990), 한국사법행정학회
- 오두진, "의료상의 자기결정권 행사와 의사의 진료업무 조화의 법적인 문제 - 종교적인 이유로 수혈을 거부하는 경우를 중심으로", 생명윤리정책연구, 4(2), pp.121~138 (2010), 생명의료법연구소
- 유승룡, "생명권과 자기결정권, 그리고 의사의 진료의무", 의료법학, 9(2), pp.11~52 (2008), 대한의료법학회
- 윤경현, "의료과오의 책임", 사법행정, 6 (1975)
- 이봉민, "자녀에 대한 의료행위에 관한 친권남용 통제 - 서울동부지방법원 2010. 10. 21.자 2010카합2341 결정 -", 법조, 61(5), pp.233~280 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 이석배, "독일 켐프테너 판결에 대한 비판적 검토", 의료법학, 9(1), pp.259~284 (2008), 대한의료법학회
- 伊藤暢章, "未成年者に對する輸血强制と親權者の職務執行停止-實例に基づく問題点の考察", 法律時報, 82(4)통권 : 1020 (2010), 日本評論社
- S. Bates, , American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, pp.178~ (2008)
- Nelson CL, "Total hip replacement without transfusion", Contemp Orthop, 2 (1980)
- Ott DA, "Cardiovascular surgery in Jehovah’s Witnesses", JAMA, 238 (1972)
- Roen PR, "Extensive urologic surgery without blood transfusion", NY State J Med, 72 (1972)
- "대구지법 1989.6.15. 선고 88드11383 심판", ~ (1989)
- "서울동부지원 2010.10.21. 선고 2010카합2341 결정", ~ (2010)
- "서울고법 2008.1.10. 선고 2005나69245 판결", ~ (2008)
- "헌재결 1990.9.10. 89헌마82 결정", ~ (1990)
- 대법원, "대법원 1980.9.24.선고 79도 1387 판결", ~ (1980)
- "대법원 1995.8.25. 선고 94다47803 판결", ~ (1995)
- "대법원 1998.2.13. 선고 96다7854 판결", ~ (1998)
- "대법원 2007.5.10. 선고 2006도6178 판결", ~ (2007)
- "유럽인권재판소 2010.6.10.선고 302", 02호 확정 판결, 2010