군인사법상 기소휴직과 사법적구제의 한계 -휴직기간의 재판청구권제한 효과와 관련하여-
The leave of absence from military service caused by prosecution and the limit of judical relief in Military Personnel Management Act -Regarding the effect of the limit on the right of access to courts during the term of the leave of absence from military service-
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In case that a military official is accused of the criminal case, an appointment authority holder can order him or her to leave from work. The criminal proceedings, however, are one thing, ordering the leave of absence from work is another. Also, even though the military official is acquitted of the criminal case, disadvantages caused by the leave of absence from work couldn’t be fundamentally compensated. Military Personnel Management Act says that if a military official gets unfavorable treatments like the leave of absence from work, he or she can file an administrative litigation. Through disclosure of information, however, I came to know that it has limits as ex post help for the military official. Even if the military official is the member of special authority relation, his or her basic human rights should be guaranteed in principle. Even when the rights are restricted, the essential contents couldn’t be infringed. Therefore the stipulation on the leave of absence from work needs to be revised.
Abstract
In case that a military official is accused of the criminal case, an appointment authority holder can order him or her to leave from work. The criminal proceedings, however, are one thing, ordering the leave of absence from work is another. Also, even though the military official is acquitted of the criminal case, disadvantages caused by the leave of absence from work couldn’t be fundamentally compensated. Military Personnel Management Act says that if a military official gets unfavorable treatments like the leave of absence from work, he or she can file an administrative litigation. Through disclosure of information, however, I came to know that it has limits as ex post help for the military official. Even if the military official is the member of special authority relation, his or her basic human rights should be guaranteed in principle. Even when the rights are restricted, the essential contents couldn’t be infringed. Therefore the stipulation on the leave of absence from work needs to be revised.
참고문헌 (22)
- 임천영, "군인사법" (2012), 법률문화원
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2012), 박영사
- 김방호, "인사소청법" (2011), 진원사
- 민병로, "일본판례헌법" (2011), 전남대학교출판부
- 이종일, "국방관련소송의 주요쟁점", 법률문화원, ~ (2011)
- 박균성, "行政法論" (2010), 博英社
- 홍성방, "헌법학" (2009), 현암사
- 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2007), 박영사
- 한겨레, "항소땐 제대 수년간 보류…장교들 ‘기소휴직’에 눈물", ~ (2012)
- 권오성, "기소를 이유로 한 휴직명령의 정당화 요건", 법률신문, 제3480호, ~ (2006)
- 김범식, "군 사법제도에 관한 고찰", 성균관법학, 24(1), pp.233~259 (2012), 법학연구소
- 국방부 인사기회관리과, "군인사법일부개정법률(안)", ~ (2009)
- 국방부, "국방관계법령해석질의응답집 제27집", ~ (2007)
- 강경근, "재판받을 권리의 제한에 관련한 최근의 헌재 결정", 고시연구, 32(3) (2005)
- 林千泳, "軍人事法上의 起訴休職制", 저스티스, (79), pp.124~148 (2004), 한국법학원
- "각군에서의 최근 5년간 형사기소에 따른 기소휴직 처분건수’ 관련 정보공개청구답변 내용(접수번호 1773138)", 국방부[URL]
- "‘각군에서의 최근 5년간 기소휴직에 대한 소청건수와 결정유형별 건수,행정소송건수와 판결유형별 건수’ 관련 정보공개청구답변 내용(접수번호 1760330)", 국방부[URL]
- "최근 5년간 군인신분(부사관 이상)으로 기소되어 항소한 건수, 상고한건수’ 관련 정보공개청구답변 내용(접수번호 1760330)", 국방부[URL]
- "도 넘은 ‘군인 재갈 물리기’"[URL]
- 大野正男, "起訴休職処分は自由裁量処分か", 判例タイムズ, (225) (1968)
- 萩澤清彦, "起訴休職-日本冶金事件-", 別冊ジュリスト (1974)
- 戸松秀典, "起訴休職(公務員に対する不利益処分と救済)", 別冊ジュリスト, (88) (1986)
