본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어중간구문의 최소주의적 고찰

A Minimalistic Approach to English Middle Constructions

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper investigates the derivation of English middle constructions. The aim of the paper is to offer a theoretical account of the formation of English Middle Constructions within the Minimalist Program. Middle Constructions are often claimed to involve Agent demotion and Patient/Theme promotion. In Middle Constructions, for instance, the grammatical subject is considered to be an underlying object and the underlying subject to be seemingly absent. This paper argues that middle verbs syntactically project both internal and external arguments of their active counter parts. Unlike other researches, however, those arguments are projected to the universally pre-defined positions; the framework adopted in the paper demonstrates that neither demotions nor promotions introduced previously are necessary to describe the derivation of the two arguments: the existence of subject and object arises solely from the general structure suggested here, which contains T(ense) and Voi(ce).. To this end, we adopted and modified Bowers’ approach(2002, 2004, 2010) which is also based on Chomsky’s minimalist program(1995, 2000, 2001).

Abstract

This paper investigates the derivation of English middle constructions. The aim of the paper is to offer a theoretical account of the formation of English Middle Constructions within the Minimalist Program. Middle Constructions are often claimed to involve Agent demotion and Patient/Theme promotion. In Middle Constructions, for instance, the grammatical subject is considered to be an underlying object and the underlying subject to be seemingly absent. This paper argues that middle verbs syntactically project both internal and external arguments of their active counter parts. Unlike other researches, however, those arguments are projected to the universally pre-defined positions; the framework adopted in the paper demonstrates that neither demotions nor promotions introduced previously are necessary to describe the derivation of the two arguments: the existence of subject and object arises solely from the general structure suggested here, which contains T(ense) and Voi(ce).. To this end, we adopted and modified Bowers’ approach(2002, 2004, 2010) which is also based on Chomsky’s minimalist program(1995, 2000, 2001).

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Akema, P, "Middles. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. III" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
  2. Bowers,John, "Transitivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.183~224 (2002)
  3. Bowers,John, "Arguments as Relations" (2010), MIT Press
  4. Burzio,L, "Italian Syntax: A government-binding approach" (1986), Reidel
  5. Carlson, G, "On the Semantic Composition of English Generic Sentences", ~ (1989)
  6. Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky.N, "Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  8. Chomsky,N, "Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  9. Chung,T, "Argument Structure and English Syntax" (2001), Hankuk Publishing Company
  10. Dahl,Östen, "On Generics. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language", pp.99~111 (1975), Cambridge University Press
  11. Generic Distinction in Tense-Aspect Systems. In the Generic Book, "The Marking of the Episodic", pp.1995, Dahl,Östen
  12. Everaert,M, "NP Movement ‘Across’ Secondary Objects. In Grammar in Progress" (1990), Foris
  13. Fagan,S, "The English Middle", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.181~203 (1988)
  14. Hokestra, T, "Middle Constructions in Dutch and English. In Knowledge and Langauge. Vol2: Lexical and Conceptual Structure" (1993), Kluwer
  15. Keyser, S, "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.183~224 (1984)
  16. Keyser, S, "Re. the abstract clitic hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.89~125 (1992)
  17. Krifka, M, "Genericity: An Introduction. In The Generic Book", pp.1~123 (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  18. Levin.L, "Sluicing: A Lexical Interpretation Procedure, In The Mental Repesentation on Grammatical Relations" (1982), MIT Press
  19. "course materials for 24.921 Special Topics in Linguistics: Genericity, MIT OpenCourseWare" (2007)[URL]
  20. Postal,P, "Edge-Based Clausal Syntax" (2010), MIT Press
  21. Roberts,I, "The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects", 박사, pp.1985
  22. Sohn,Y, "Middle Constructions in English: The Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface", 박사, pp.2002
  23. Stroik,T, "Middles and Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.127~137 (1992)
  24. 서진희, "영어 수동구문의 최소주의적 고찰", 언어연구, 24(3), pp.525~543 (2008), 한국현대언어학회
  25. Suh,Y, "Transtivity alternation constructions in English: with special reference to Middle Constructions", 박사, pp.1999
  26. Vendler,Z, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)