영어 수동구문과 다중투사
English Passive Constructions and Split Projection
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to account for the structure of English passive constructions within both Minimalist theory and functional-pragmatic theory. In functional- pragmatic theory we can lead to the conclusion that the subject of passive constructions is a topic, not a subject. In Minimalist theory the subject of passive constructions is placed in a position generated from split projection of CP, while the subject of active constructions is placed in Spec of TP. Although it is generally accepted that the topic is situated in CP, in this paper I argue that the landing site of a topic is not in CP but in TP. To be specific, if we accept Park(1996)'s Outer Spec-Head Agreement(OSHA), the topic is situated in SPEC of TP, Outer SPEC of TP. If there is no need for a topic to move to CP over TP for its landing site, the topic in SPEC of TP comes out of an analysis based on the Minimalist theory, I can assert. Furthermore, SPEC of TP has the advantage to provide landing sites of elements placed between C(omplementizer) and Spec of TP that we examined through Korean, English, and Polish examples.
Abstract
This paper aims to account for the structure of English passive constructions within both Minimalist theory and functional-pragmatic theory. In functional- pragmatic theory we can lead to the conclusion that the subject of passive constructions is a topic, not a subject. In Minimalist theory the subject of passive constructions is placed in a position generated from split projection of CP, while the subject of active constructions is placed in Spec of TP. Although it is generally accepted that the topic is situated in CP, in this paper I argue that the landing site of a topic is not in CP but in TP. To be specific, if we accept Park(1996)'s Outer Spec-Head Agreement(OSHA), the topic is situated in SPEC of TP, Outer SPEC of TP. If there is no need for a topic to move to CP over TP for its landing site, the topic in SPEC of TP comes out of an analysis based on the Minimalist theory, I can assert. Furthermore, SPEC of TP has the advantage to provide landing sites of elements placed between C(omplementizer) and Spec of TP that we examined through Korean, English, and Polish examples.
참고문헌 (20)
- 박세영, "다중 지정어와 다중전치 의문사 구조", 초당대논문집, 14, pp.399~414 (2009)
- Abney, S., "The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect", 박사, pp.1987
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Bare Phrase Structure", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 5 (1994)
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by Phase", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18 (1999)
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Givón, T. Syntax, "A Functional Typological Introduction. Vol. I" (1984), John Benjamins
- Givón, T. Syntax, "A Functional Typological Introduction. Vol. II" (1990), John Benjamins
- Jaeggli, O., "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~622 (1986)
- Jesperson, O., "Essentials of English Grammar" (1933), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Katz, J. J., "An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions" (1964), MIT Press
- Kayne, R. S., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kuno, S., "Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lees, R. B., "The Grammar Of English Nominalizations" (1960), Mouton
- Li, C. N., "Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language" (1976)
- Park, Se-young, "Functional Categories in English and Korean", 박사, pp.1996
- Radford, A., "English Syntax: An Introduction" (2004), University of Cambridge Press
- Wasow, T., "Transformations and the Lexicon" (1977), In Culicover et al.(eds.)