담화표지의 위치 변인에 따른 기능 연구-여성 결혼이민자의 구어 담화를 바탕으로-
A Study of Functions of Discourse Markers Based on their Positions in Spoken Language of Marriage Woman Immigrants
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to grasp the usage aspects of discourse markers found ineveryday conversation of married woman immigrants, and to analyse thedifference in terms of the function of discourse markers by their appearingpositions. When we look at the overall characteristics, it appears that marriedwoman immigrants having beginning level of Korean prominency use discoursemarkers at the beginning of utterances to gain time. Especially, exclamative typediscourse markers such as ‘a/e’ and ‘ce’ predominantly appeared to show thischaracteristics. ‘근데’ and ‘아니’ which have the most high frequency intensively appeared atthe beginning of utterances, however the function looked to be different fromeach other. That is, ‘근데’ appeared to be used for the function of topicconnection, changing topics, depriving opponent's turn-taking, while ‘아니’appeared to modify opponent's utterance and depriving opponent's turn-taking. Itappeared that ‘이거’ played a role for changing topics at the beginning ofutterances or between phrases, ‘이렇게’ for equivocation at the end of utterancesor between phrases, ‘뭐’ for gaining time at the beginning of utterances, after thestarter, or between phrases. From this observation, we could confirm that some discourse markers appearingat the same position can act different functions in discourse.
Abstract
This study aims to grasp the usage aspects of discourse markers found ineveryday conversation of married woman immigrants, and to analyse thedifference in terms of the function of discourse markers by their appearingpositions. When we look at the overall characteristics, it appears that marriedwoman immigrants having beginning level of Korean prominency use discoursemarkers at the beginning of utterances to gain time. Especially, exclamative typediscourse markers such as ‘a/e’ and ‘ce’ predominantly appeared to show thischaracteristics. ‘근데’ and ‘아니’ which have the most high frequency intensively appeared atthe beginning of utterances, however the function looked to be different fromeach other. That is, ‘근데’ appeared to be used for the function of topicconnection, changing topics, depriving opponent's turn-taking, while ‘아니’appeared to modify opponent's utterance and depriving opponent's turn-taking. Itappeared that ‘이거’ played a role for changing topics at the beginning ofutterances or between phrases, ‘이렇게’ for equivocation at the end of utterancesor between phrases, ‘뭐’ for gaining time at the beginning of utterances, after thestarter, or between phrases. From this observation, we could confirm that some discourse markers appearingat the same position can act different functions in discourse.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강현화, "코퍼스를 이용한 부사의 어휘 교육 방안 연구", 이중언어학, 17, pp.57~75 (2000), 이중언어학회
- 김선정, "여성 결혼이민자의 구어에 나타난 담화표지 사용 양상 연구", 언어과학연구, (64), pp.25~46 (2013), 언어과학회
- 국립국어원, "21세기 세종계획 국어 특수 자료 구축", 국립국어원, ~ (2006)
- 김미선, "‘그런데’의 담화 기능 연구", 인문과학연구, (34), pp.35~54 (2012), 인문과학연구소
- 남길임, "국어 억양 단위의 통사적 상관성 연구 - 구어 독백 말뭉치를 중심으로-", 어문학, (96), pp.21~50 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 남길임, "담화표지 ‘뭐’의 사용패턴과 기능", 한글, (288), pp.91~119 (2010), 한글학회
- 송인성, "담화표지 ‘뭐’의 기능과 운율적 특성", 한국어학, 58, pp.83~106 (2013), 한국어학회
- 심란희, "의사소통 중심의 한국어교육을 위한 담화표지 ‘그냥’의 기능 연구", 한국문법교육학회 제14차 전국학술대회 논문집, pp.64~89 (2011)
- 안의정, "말뭉치를 이용한 어휘의 구어성 측정과 활용", 어문논집, (57), pp.93~119 (2008), 민족어문학회
- 안주호, "한국어 담화표지 분석", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 17, pp.21~38 (1992), 연세대학교한국어학당
- 안주호, "한국어교육에서의 담화표지 위계화 방안", 한국어교육, 20(3), pp.135~159 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이한규, "한국어 담화표지어 ‘그래’의 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 3, pp.1~26 (1996), 인지언어학회
- 임규홍, "국어 담화표지 ‘인자’에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 2, pp.1~20 (1996), 담화·인지언어학회
- 전영옥, "한국어 담화표지의 특징 연구", 화법연구, 4, pp.113~145 (2002), 한국화법학회
- 전영옥, "말뭉치를 바탕으로 한 한국어 감탄사 연구", 텍스트언어학, 27, pp.245~274 (2009), 한국텍스트언어학회
- Aijmer, K., "Conversational Routines in English : Convention and Creativity" (1996), Longman
- Blakemore, D., "Semantic Constraints on Relevance" (1987), Basil Blackwell
- Clark, H., "Using Language" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Erman, B., "Pragmatic Expressions in English- A Study of You Know, You See and I Mean in Face-to-face Conversation" (1987), Almoqvist & Wiksell International
- Ernst, T., "Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Position in English" (1984), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Fraser, B., "Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers", Approaches to Discourse Particles, 1, pp.189~205 (2006)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Östman, J., "You know : A Discourse-functional Study" (1982), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Parrot, M., "Grammar for English Language Teachers" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Schiffrin, D., "Discourse Markers" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Zwicky, A. M., "Clitics and Particles", Language, 61(2), pp.283~305 (1985)