한국어 조건문 항진명제에 대한 재고찰
A Review on the Korean Conditional Tautologies
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The research subject of this study is the Korean conditional tautologies, and this study explores the Korean conditional tautologies in the conversations of daily life from the aspects of the syntactic and semantic features as well as the discourse functions of pragmatics. In terms of syntactic construction type, the findings through corpus are as below. First, the Korean conditional tautologies used in daily life are more diversified than previous research indicated. Second, the part of speech for predicates of the antecedent and following clauses connected by‘-(으)면’is not restricted, so it can be a noun, an adjective, or a verb. Third, the conditional sentences of previous clauses can combine with modality or mood markers. However, different subjects in antecedent and following clauses linked by mood markers are found in the Korean conditional tautologies. This is contradictory to the definition of the Korean conditional tautologies that the propositions in antecedent and following clauses should be the same. Thus, the Korean conditional tautologies with different subjects are named pseudo-tautologies in this study. Semantic features are found as follows. First, different from the nominal tautologies, such as‘N은 N이다’, the Korean conditional tautologies can combine with past tense and modality endings. Second, both antecedent and following clauses can merge with modality markers, and the modality markers are not necessarily the same. Pseudo-tautologies cannot only combine with mood markers, but they can also be used in shifting of moods. Third, the Korean conditional tautologies frequently co-occur with polarity adverbials. Forth, the Korean conditional tautologies indicate propositions related to topics discussed. The pragmatic findings of discourse functions are as below. First, the Korean conditional tautologies resonate with listeners or attempt to convince listeners to agree. Second, Korean conditional tautologies can be useful in making a conclusion or changing topics. Third, based on the Relevance Theory, this study maintains that the Korean conditional tautologies are a strategy of loose talk. Forth, the Relevance Theory can explain why the Korean conditional tautologies have the irony effect.
Abstract
The research subject of this study is the Korean conditional tautologies, and this study explores the Korean conditional tautologies in the conversations of daily life from the aspects of the syntactic and semantic features as well as the discourse functions of pragmatics. In terms of syntactic construction type, the findings through corpus are as below. First, the Korean conditional tautologies used in daily life are more diversified than previous research indicated. Second, the part of speech for predicates of the antecedent and following clauses connected by‘-(으)면’is not restricted, so it can be a noun, an adjective, or a verb. Third, the conditional sentences of previous clauses can combine with modality or mood markers. However, different subjects in antecedent and following clauses linked by mood markers are found in the Korean conditional tautologies. This is contradictory to the definition of the Korean conditional tautologies that the propositions in antecedent and following clauses should be the same. Thus, the Korean conditional tautologies with different subjects are named pseudo-tautologies in this study. Semantic features are found as follows. First, different from the nominal tautologies, such as‘N은 N이다’, the Korean conditional tautologies can combine with past tense and modality endings. Second, both antecedent and following clauses can merge with modality markers, and the modality markers are not necessarily the same. Pseudo-tautologies cannot only combine with mood markers, but they can also be used in shifting of moods. Third, the Korean conditional tautologies frequently co-occur with polarity adverbials. Forth, the Korean conditional tautologies indicate propositions related to topics discussed. The pragmatic findings of discourse functions are as below. First, the Korean conditional tautologies resonate with listeners or attempt to convince listeners to agree. Second, Korean conditional tautologies can be useful in making a conclusion or changing topics. Third, based on the Relevance Theory, this study maintains that the Korean conditional tautologies are a strategy of loose talk. Forth, the Relevance Theory can explain why the Korean conditional tautologies have the irony effect.
참고문헌 (40)
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법 2" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 목정수, "한국어, 보편과 특수 사이" (2013), 태학사
- 문숙영, "한국어의 시제 범주" (2009), 태학사
- 이미순, "항진 명제 발화의 해석에 대한 재검토", 담화와 인지, 16(2), pp.123~147 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이성범, "화용론연구", pp.13~45 (2002), 태학사
- 이정애, "국어 항진명제에 대한 의미 연구", 한국어 의미학, 33, pp.179~202 (2010), 한국어의미학회
- 이정애, "국어 항진명제의 통사유형과 의미", 한국언어문학, (87), pp.65~93 (2013), 한국언어문학회
- 임지룡, "인지 의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 장경희, "현대국어 양태범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 장석진, "話用論硏究" (1985), 탑출판사
- 전혜영, "구어 담화에 나타나는 ‘X는 X다’ 표현의 화용 양상", 國語學, (64), pp.273~299 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 정희자, "담화와 문법" (2008), 한국문화사
- 진관초, "한국어 증거성 표지의 담화화용적 기능: 혼잣말의 쓰임을 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 48, pp.79~114 (2015), 한국어의미학회
- 최중열, "항진명제(tautology)의 의미해석", 인문과학연구, (창간), pp.139~150 (1992), 전주대학교 인문과학종합연구소
- 한동완, "국어의 시제 연구" (1996), 태학사
- Bulhof, J., "Deep tautologies", Pragmatics & Cognition, 9, pp.279~291 (2001)
- Bulhof, J., "A tautology is a tautology(or is it?)", Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.1003~1005 (2004)
- Croft, William, "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Evans, V., "Cognitive Linguistics : An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Farghal, M, "Colloquial jordanian arabic tautologies", Journal of Pragmatics, 17, pp.223~240 (1992)
- Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Fraser, Bruce, "Motor oil Is motor oil: an account of English nominal tautologies", Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp.215~220 (1988)
- Grice, Paul, "Logic and conversation", Syntax and Semantics, 3, pp.41~58 (1975)
- Kwon, Iksoo, "A tautology is a tautology: specificity and categorization innominal tautological constructions", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35, pp.1~36 (2009)
- Kwon, Iksoo, "Categorization and its embodiment: Korean tautological constructions in mental spaces theory", Language Sciences, 45, pp.44~55 (2014)
- Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Re-veal about the Mind" (1987), Chicago University Press
- Levinson, Stephen, "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Levinson, Stephen, "Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature" (2000), MIT Press
- Okamoto, S., "Nominal tautologies in Japanese", Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.218~229 (1991)
- Okamoto, S., "Nominal repetitive constructions in japanese : the tautology controversy revisited", Journal of Pragmatics, 20, pp.433~466 (1993)
- Panther, K. U., "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 30, pp.755~769 (1998)
- "A Cross-linguistic Comparison of Tautological Constructions with Special Focus on English Special Focus on English" (2009)[URL]
- "Tautological constructions in English...and beyond" (2009)[URL]
- Sperber, D., "Relevance" (1995), Blackwell
- Ward, Gregory L., "A pragmatic analysis of tautological utterances", Journal of Pragmatics, 15, pp.507~520 (1991)
- Wierzbicka, Anna, "Boys will be boys: “Radical Semantics” vs “Radical Pragmatics.”", Language, 63, pp.95~114 (1987)
- Wierzbicka, Anna, "Boys will be Boys: A rejoinder to Bruce Fraser", Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp.221~224 (1988)
- Wierzbicka, Anna, "Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, The Semantics of Human Interaction" (2003), Mouton de gruyter
- Wilson, D., "On verbal irony", Lingua, 87, pp.53~76 (1992)
- Wong, King-on, John, "Semantics and pragmatics of tautology in Cantonese", pp.2006