EXPRESSING CONDITIONS IN KOREAN
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concerned with the meanings and implicatures of the conditional constructions in Korean. Building on Mittwoch, Huddleston, and Collins’s (2001) pioneering work on the semantics and pragmatics of English conditional constructions, I will first show that the corresponding Korean conditional constructions have the same semantic meanings and the same range of pragmatic usages. I will then argue that the division of labor between semantics and pragmatics helps solve some long-standing questions about the Korean conditional constructions. I will finally discuss the distribution of weak negative polarity items (NPIs) in conditional constructions of both languages and conclude that these NPIs are licensed not only at the level of semantics but also at the level of pragmatic use, in favor of Linebarger’s (1987) approach.
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the meanings and implicatures of the conditional constructions in Korean. Building on Mittwoch, Huddleston, and Collins’s (2001) pioneering work on the semantics and pragmatics of English conditional constructions, I will first show that the corresponding Korean conditional constructions have the same semantic meanings and the same range of pragmatic usages. I will then argue that the division of labor between semantics and pragmatics helps solve some long-standing questions about the Korean conditional constructions. I will finally discuss the distribution of weak negative polarity items (NPIs) in conditional constructions of both languages and conclude that these NPIs are licensed not only at the level of semantics but also at the level of pragmatic use, in favor of Linebarger’s (1987) approach.
참고문헌 (19)
- Dudman, V. H., "On conditionals", Journal of Philosophy, 3, pp.113~128 (1994)
- Mittwoch, Anita, "The clause: adjuncts. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language", pp.663~784 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Ladusaw, William, "Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations", 박사, pp.1979
- Ladusaw, William, "Logical form and conditions on grammaticality", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, pp.389~422 (1983)
- Lakoff, R., "Some reasons why there can’t be any some-any rule", Language, 45 (1969)
- Lee Chungmin, "hankwuke coken·wenin kwumwun-uy thongsalon-kwa uymilon ‘The syntax and semantics of the conditional·causal constructions in Korean’", Proceedings of the First International Conference on Koreanology (1980), hankwukcengsinmunhwayenkwuwen
- Lee, Chungmin, "The semantics of amu N-to", -ilato, Language and Information, pp.2000, 4[DOI]
- Lee, Gun Won, "hankwuke nonlicek yenkyele soko ‘A study on logical linking words’", Language Research, 19(1) (1983)
- 이현우, "The Morphology-Based Semantics of “any” in English and Korean", 언어학, 31, pp.127~158 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- Lee, Ik-Sup, "kwuke mwunpeplon kanguy ‘A Lecture on Korean Grammar’" (1999), hakyensa
- Lee, Pangsu, "swuhak 10-ka ‘Math 10-A’" (2008), chenjaykyoywuk
- Linebarger, Marcia, "Negative polarity and grammatical representation", Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, pp.325~387 (1987)
- Nam, Seungho, "hankwuke-uy pwucengkuke-uy ywuhyeng-kwa ku hekacoken ‘Types of negative polarity items and their licensing conditions’", Eoneohag, 22, pp.217~244 (1998)
- Shin, Sang-chul, "A unifying theory of topic, conditional, and relative constructions in Korean: A case study for archimorpheme across syntactic categories", 박사, pp.1987
- Song, M. J., "hyentay kwuke cepsokmwun-uy uymi yenkwu ‘A study on the semantics of subordinate clauses in Korean’", 석사, pp.1985
- Traugott, Elizabeth C., "On conditionals" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Yeom, Jae-Il, "-(U)myen vs. -ta", lamyen, 2004, pp.8(1), 1~20
- Yun, Jiwon, "hankwuke cokenmwun-uy ywuhyeng-ey ttalun uymi thukseng yenkwu ‘A study on conditionals in Korean: Focused on the conditional markers -myen, -ya, and – to’", 석사, pp.2004
- Zwarts, Frans, "Three types of polarity. In Plurality and Quantification" (1998), Kluwer