본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유형론적으로 유사한 제2언어의 선행 학습경험이 제3언어로서의 한국어 습득에 미치는 효과 연구

The Influence of Previous Experience of Learning a Typologically Similar Second Language on the Acquisition of Korean as a Third Language

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In this study the author conducted an experimental test of adult third language (L3) acquisition whose results provide concrete and clear evidence for the Cumulative Enhancement Model (CEM; Flynn, Foley and Vinnitskaya, 2004). The main research questions examined in the present study were as follows: (1) whether L1 or L2 has a privileged role in L3acquisition as to syntactic transfer, (2) what particular categories of the syntactic knowledge in Korean were acquired most and least easily by those with previous experience; (3) if age factor matters with respect to syntactic transfer in L3 acquisition, and lastly, (4) whether syntactic transfer is limited only to the initial state of L3 acquisition. The current study reports data from three experimental groups as follows: (Group A) L1 English/L2 Korean,(Group B) L1 English/L2 Japanese/L3 Korean, (Group C) L1 Japanese/L2English/L3 Korean. All subjects were tested on their knowledge of 6different types of syntactic categories (10 subcategories) of Korean by the elicited imitation methodology (Lust, Chien and Flynn, 1987; Lust, Flynn and Foley, 1996) with Korean sentences of varying types.

Abstract

In this study the author conducted an experimental test of adult third language (L3) acquisition whose results provide concrete and clear evidence for the Cumulative Enhancement Model (CEM; Flynn, Foley and Vinnitskaya, 2004). The main research questions examined in the present study were as follows: (1) whether L1 or L2 has a privileged role in L3acquisition as to syntactic transfer, (2) what particular categories of the syntactic knowledge in Korean were acquired most and least easily by those with previous experience; (3) if age factor matters with respect to syntactic transfer in L3 acquisition, and lastly, (4) whether syntactic transfer is limited only to the initial state of L3 acquisition. The current study reports data from three experimental groups as follows: (Group A) L1 English/L2 Korean,(Group B) L1 English/L2 Japanese/L3 Korean, (Group C) L1 Japanese/L2English/L3 Korean. All subjects were tested on their knowledge of 6different types of syntactic categories (10 subcategories) of Korean by the elicited imitation methodology (Lust, Chien and Flynn, 1987; Lust, Flynn and Foley, 1996) with Korean sentences of varying types.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Bardel, C, "The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax", Second Language Research, 23, pp.459~484 (2007)
  2. Brown, H. Douglas, "Readings on Second Language Acquisition" (1995), Prentice Hall Regents
  3. Chomsky,N, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  4. Chomsky,N, "Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Praeger
  5. Comrie, B, "Noun Phrase Accessibility Revisited", Language, 55(3), pp.649~664 (1979)
  6. Dye, C., "Mismatches between Morphology and Syntax in First Language Acquisition Suggest a ‘Syntax-First’ Model", ~ (2004)
  7. Dryer,Matthew S, "The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations", Language, 68 (1992)
  8. Flynne,S, "Study of the effects of principal branching direction in second language acquisition: The generalization of a parameter of universal grammar from first to second language acquisition", 박사, pp.1983
  9. Flynne,S, "A parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition" (1987), Reidel
  10. head-final parameter in the acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Spanish and Japanese speakers, In Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, "The role of the head-initial", pp.1989, Flynne,S
  11. Flynn, S., "The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition relative clauses", The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, pp.3~16 (2004)
  12. Flynn, S., "New paradigm for the Study of Simultaneous v. Sequential Bilingualism", Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp.768~774 (2005), Cascadilla Press
  13. Acquisition of relative clauses: Developmental changes in their heads, In Conell Working Papers in Linguistics, "Flynn, S", Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University, ~ (1981)
  14. Goodluck, H, "Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses", Cognition, 11, pp.1~27 (1982)
  15. Hamburger, H, "Relative acquisition, In Language Development. Vol 1, Syntax and Semantics" (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum
  16. Jo,Jaehyun, "The Influence of Previous Experience of Learning a Typologically Similar Second Language on the Acquisition of Korean as a Third Language", 석사, pp.2010
  17. Johnson,J, "Critical period effects in second language acquisition: The effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence", Language Learning, 42, pp.217~248 (1992)
  18. Johnson, J, "Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language", Cognitive Psychology, 21, pp.60~99 (1989)
  19. Keenan, E, "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), pp.63~99 (1977)
  20. Kellerman,E, "Now you see it, now you don’t. In Language Transfer in Language Learning", pp.112~134 (1983), Newbury House
  21. Kellerman,E, "An eye for an eye: crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition", pp.35~48 (1986), Pergamon
  22. Lehman,Winfred P, "A Structural Principle of Language and Its Implications", Language, 49, pp.47~66 (1973)
  23. Lightfoot,D, "The child’s trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability", Behavioral and Brain Science, 12 (1989)
  24. Long,MH, "Maturational constraints on language development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, pp.251~285 (1990)
  25. Lust, B., "What children know: Methods for the study of first language acquisition. In B. Lust, ed., Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Volume 2: Applying the Constraints", pp.271~356 (1987), Reidel
  26. Lust, B., "What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. In Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax" (1996), MIT Press
  27. Martohardjono, G, "Is There an Age-Factor for Universal Grammar?, In The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition" (1995), Multilingual Matters Ltd
  28. Polinsky, M, "Linguistic typology and theory construction: Common challenges ahead", Linguistic Typology, 11, pp.273~283 (2007)
  29. Rothman, J, "What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state", Second Language Research, 26(2), pp.189~218 (2010)
  30. Travis,LM, "Parameters and effects of word order variation", 석사, pp.1984
  31. Venneman,Theo, "Explanation in Syntax", Syntax and Semantics, 2, pp.1~50 (1973)
  32. Vinnitskaya, I., "The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in a Third Language: Comparing Adults and Children", Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002), pp.340~345 (2003)
  33. White, L, "Universal Grammar: Is it Just a New Name for Old Problems?, In Language Transfer in Language Learning", pp.217~232 (1992), J. Benjamins
  34. Williams, S, "Language switches in L3 production: implications for a polyglot speaking model", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.295~333 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)