본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기술집약적 기업의 사회적 자본과 흡수역량이 기술사업화 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구

An Empirical Study on the Effects of Social Capital and Absorptive Capacity on Technology Commercialization Performance in Technology-based Firms

강민형|노종범
산업개발연구소 (kyungsung university)|2016.03|산업혁신연구 (Journal of Industrial Innovation)|제32권 제1호|pp. 31-71|DOI 10.22793/indinn.2016.32.1.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

사회적 자본흡수역량absorptive capacitysocial capitaltechnology commercialization기술사업화 성과technological turbulence기술집약적 기업기술 변동성technology commercialization performance

초록

본 연구에서는 우리나라 기술집약적 기업들의 사회적 자본과 흡수역량이 기술사업화 성과에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 분석하였다. 추가적으로 기술집약적 기업들이 흡수역량을 통해 기술사업화 성과를 높이는데 있어서 환경적 요인인 기술 변동성이 존재할 것이라고 생각하여 흡수역량과 기술사업화 성과 간에 기술 변동성을 조절변수로 설정하여 조절효과를 분석하였다. 또한, 기업크기별, 산업분야별에 사회적 자본과 흡수역량이 기술사업화 성과에 미치는 영향 및 흡수역량과 기술사업화 성과 간에 기술 변동성의 영향 관계도 살펴보았다. 실증분석을 위해 기술 산업에 속한 기업들의 대표이사, 연구소 소장, 부장급 이상 등을 대상으로 설문응답을 통해 105개 데이터를 확보하였으며, 연구모델에 대한 개념적 차원에 따른 모델의 설명력, 엄격한 검증을 위해 PLS-SEM를 사용하였다. 실증분석을 통해 도출한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기술집약적 기업들이 기술사업화 성과를 높이는데 사회적 자본과 흡수역량이 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 결과를 도출하였다. 둘째, 기술집약적 산업에서 환경적인 요인인 기술 변동성이 존재 할 경우, 실현적 흡수역량보다 잠재적 흡수역량이 기술사업화 성과를 높이는 것으로 확인되었다. 이 결과는 기술집약적 기업들이 기술 변동성에 대응하기 위해 새로운 특허, 노하우, 신제품 개발 및 출시, 신제품의 시장성을 확보하는데 있어서 외부로부터 다양한 정보, 지식, 보완적 자원을 습득하는데 열중하고, 예측할 수 없는 변화에 대응하기 위해 시장과 환경을 빠르게 파악한다는 것을 의미한다. 그러므로 기술집약적 기업들은 기술 변동성이 높은 환경에서 기술사업화 성과를 이루기 위해서는 잠재적 흡수역량을 집중적으로 강화하는 것이 중요하며, 잠재적 흡수역량을 강화하기 위해 외부로 사회적 자본을 형성하는 것이 중요하겠다.

Abstract

This study attempts to empirically analyze the effects of social capital and absorptive capacity on technology commercialization performance in the Korean technology-based firms. In addition, technology-based firms might be experiences in environmental change, so confirmed about the moderator variable of technological turbulence on positive relationship of absorptive capacity and technology commercialization performance. And controlled for company's size, industry type as follows. The empirical results from a sample of 105 the chief, CEO, research institute director of Korean technology-based firms reveal several important findings and used analysis instrument as PLS-SEM. We obtain the following results. First, social capital and absorptive capacity have a positive effect on technology commercialization performance. Second, when technology-based firms experiencing technological turbulence, on positive relationship of potential absorptive capacity better than realized absorptive capacity and technology commercialization performance. The two absorptive capacity are complementary, not alternative. These results show that efforts are needed To improve the performance of technology commercialization, two complementary strategies are necessary.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Adler, P.S., "Social capital: prospects for a new concept", Academy of Management Review, 27(1), pp.17~40 (2002)
  2. Arora, A., "Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy", Industrial and corporate change, 10(2), pp.419~451 (2001)
  3. Balkin, D. B., "Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?", Academy of management journal, 43(6), pp.1118~1129 (2000)
  4. Barkema, H. G., "International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective", Academy of Management journal, 41(1), pp.7~26 (1998)
  5. Baron, "Overcoming barriers to technology transfer", Res.-Tech. Manage., 33(1), pp.38~43 (1990)
  6. Burt, R. S., "The network structure of social capital", Research in organizational behavior, 22, pp.345~423 (2000)
  7. Calantone RJ, "Business performance and strategic new product development activities: an empirical investigation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, pp.214~223 (1995)
  8. Calantone, R., "The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy plannin", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), pp.90~103 (2003)
  9. Cohen, W. M., "Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D", The economic journal, pp.569~596 (1989)
  10. Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative science quarterly, pp.128~152 (1990)
  11. Colombo, M. G., "Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), pp.75~100 (2015)
  12. Cooper G., "Strategic marketing planning for radically new products", Journal of Marketing, 63, pp.1~16 (2000)
  13. Datta, A., "Combining networks, ambidexterity and absorptive capacity to explain commercialization of innovations: a theoretical model from review and extension", Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(4) (2011)
  14. Datta, A., "Information technology based knowledge capability and commercialization of innovations: Modeling the impacts on ambidexterity and absorptive capacity", Strategic Management Review, 6(1), pp.75~97 (2012)
  15. Day G., "Creating a market-driven organization", Sloan Management Review, 41(1), pp.11~22 (1999)
  16. Dess, G. G., "Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship", Journal of Management, 29(3), pp.351~378 (2003)
  17. Doss, B. D., "The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: an 8-year prospective study", Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(3), pp.601~619 (2009)
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?", Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), pp.1105~1121 (2000)
  19. Fernández, P., "Relationships among functional units and new product performance: The moderating effect of technological turbulence", Technovation, 30(5), pp.310~321 (2010)
  20. Frishammar, J., "Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: The importance of integrating product development knowledge", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4), pp.573~589 (2012)
  21. George, G., "The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: a study of biotechnology firms", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), pp.205~226 (2001)
  22. Granovetter, M., "Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis", Acta sociologica, 35(1), pp.3~11 (1992)
  23. Hargadon, A., "Action and Possibility : Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations", Organization Science, 13(3), pp.290~302 (2002)
  24. Hyder, A. S., "Product and skills development in small-and medium-sized high-tech firms through international strategic alliances", Singapore Management Review, 26(2), pp.1~24 (2004)
  25. Iansiti M., "Science-based product development: an empirical study of the mainframe computer industry", Product and Operations Management, 4(4), pp.335~359 (1995)
  26. Jaworski, B. J., "Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences", Journal of Marketing, 57(3), pp.53~70 (1993)
  27. Leonard-Barton D., "Wellsprings of Knowledge" (1995), Harvard Business School Press
  28. Li, Y., "Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization: evidence from China's transitional economy", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(1), pp.63~78 (2008)
  29. Lichtenthaler, U, "Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes", Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp.822~846 (2009)
  30. Liu, H., "The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility", Decision Support Systems, 54(3), pp.1452~1462 (2013)
  31. Lumpkin, G. T., "Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance", Academy of management Review, 21(1), pp.135~172 (1996)
  32. Macke, J., "Building inter-organizational social capital instruments to evaluate collaborative networks", I-Business, 2(1), pp.67~ (2010)
  33. March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  34. Marsh, S. J., "Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), pp.422~436 (2006)
  35. Martínez-Cañas, R., "Knowledge acquisition's mediation of social capital-firm innovation", Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), pp.61~76 (2012)
  36. Mitchell, W., "Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods", Strategic management journal, 17(3), pp.169~195 (1996)
  37. Monteverde, K., "Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry", Management Science, 41(10), pp.1624~1638 (1995)
  38. Moorman, C., "The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity", Journal of marketing research, pp.91~106 (1997)
  39. Moran, P., "VALUE CREATION BY FIRMS", Academy of Management Proceedings, 1996(1), pp.41~45 (1996)
  40. Mowery, D. C., "Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer", Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp.77~91 (1996)
  41. Mukerji, B., "The role of organizational capabilities in technology commercialization performance", 박사, pp.2008
  42. Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage", Academy of management review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
  43. Nevens, T. M., "Commercializing technology : What the best companies do?", Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp.154~163 (1990)
  44. O'Sullivan, D., "Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performancem", Journal of Marketing, 71(2), pp.79~93 (2007)
  45. Unpacking open innovation: Absorptive capacity, exploratory and exploitative openness and the growth of entrepreneurial biopharmaceutical firms, "Roper, S.", Enterprise Research Centre, ~ (2014)
  46. Rosenau MD Jr., "Radical innovation : how mature companies can outsmart upstarts", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4), pp.278~279 (2001)
  47. Song, M., "The effects of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development", Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp.61~80 (2001)
  48. Stevens, G., "Creativity business discipline= higher profits faster from new product development", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5), pp.455~468 (1999)
  49. Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic management journal, 18(7), pp.509~533 (1997)
  50. Tsai, W., "Social capital and value creation : The role of intra-firm networks", Academy of management Journal, 41(4), pp.464~476 (1998)
  51. Upadhyayula, R. S., "Social capital as an antecedent of absorptive capacity of firms", DRUID Summer Conference on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development (2004)
  52. Venkatraman, N., "Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches", Academy of management review, 11(4), pp.801~814 (1986)
  53. Weiss, Allen M., "The Nature of Organizational Search in High Technology Markets", Journal of Marketing Research, 30, pp.220~233 (1993)
  54. Zahra, S. A., "Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance", Strategic management journal, 14(6), pp.451~478 (1993)
  55. Zahra, S. A., "Absorptive capacity : A review, reconceptualization, and extension", Academy of management review, 27(2), pp.185~203 (2002)
  56. Zahra, S. A., "The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity", Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), pp.195~220 (2008)
  57. Zahra, S. A., "Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization", Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), pp.377~398 (2002)
  58. Zahra, S. A., "Technology strategy and new venture performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures", Journal of business venturing, 11(4), pp.289~321 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

기술협력 네트워크에서의 사회적자본, 지식활용, 제품혁신성과의 관계에 대한 실증연구강석민, 김대원한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2014 · 제15권 제4호기술혁신과 기업성과와의 관계에서 흡수역량과 조직문화의 조절효과 연구김영준, 신왕재, 황보윤한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2024 · 제19권 제6호기술혁신 역량이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 — 기술사업화 역량의 조절효과를 중심으로 —신성욱대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2019 · 제38권 제1호스타트업의 기술지향성이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향:사회적 자본의 매개효과서정해, 이은아한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2017 · 제24권 제6호인접성과 사회적 자본이 한국중소기업의 기술협력성과에 미치는 영향 :공동연구개발과제를 중심으로김병근, 박성근한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2013 · 제35권 제3호기술혁신역량과 사회적 자본이 비재무성과에 미치는 영향 - 수도권 중소기업을 대상으로-류길호, 이선규중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2019 · 제9권 제11호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

기업의 연결망 특성이 생산성에 미치는 영향홍장표, 정재헌pp. 1-29지식경영 구현을 위한 핵심성공요인이 지식관리시스템과 기업의 혁신성과에 관한 실증 연구: 경산산업단지 기술혁신형 중소기업 중심으로조진호pp. 73-111공기업 조직혁신을 위한 선행요인이 조직성과에 미치는 영향: 조직혁신의 매개효과를 중심으로 한 한국과 중국 공기업의 비교연구손미옥, 윤영호, 정진섭pp. 113-150금속 소매대리점의 생산효율성 분석김명종, 이양수pp. 151-185기업신용등급 예측을 위한 랜덤 포레스트의 응용안현철, 김성진pp. 187-211
원문 보기