본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

간호 시뮬레이션에서 CPR 지식평가를 위한 도구개발 및 검증

Development and Validation of Tools for Assessing CPR Knowledge in Nursing Simulation

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to create a Cardiopulmonar y Resuscitation (CPR) knowledge assessment tool for nurses and establish its reliability and validity for effectively measuring CPR knowledge in nursing simulation. Methods: This methodological study began by developing of 20 preliminary CPR-related questions in a dichotomous format, crafted through collaborative discussions with a rapid response team and a nursing education team. A sample of 226 ward nurses from a tertiary general hospital were assessed for CPR knowledge using these questions before undergoing CPR simulation training. The tool’s reliability was measured using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) and confidence intervals, and its validity was determined through difficulty and discrimination indices derived from Item Response Theory. The contrasted group validity was assessed for construction validity. Results: Correlation analysis led to the elimination of three questions with low overall correlation coefficients. Subsequent difficulty and discrimination verification removed five non-discriminatory items. A significant difference in mean scores was found between novice nurses and the rest of the participants (t=2.68, p=.008), highlighting the tool’s construct validity to experience. The final assessment comprised 12 questions on Basic Life Support (BLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and endotracheal intubation knowledge. The KR-20 reliability coefficient was .31, and the average score for all subjects was 8.15±1.66 with a confidence interval of 7.93∼8.36. Conclusion: This tool is expected to secure greater validity through use with a wider range of nurses in future CPR education simulations, enhancing its effectiveness in measuring and improving CPR competencies.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to create a Cardiopulmonar y Resuscitation (CPR) knowledge assessment tool for nurses and establish its reliability and validity for effectively measuring CPR knowledge in nursing simulation. Methods: This methodological study began by developing of 20 preliminary CPR-related questions in a dichotomous format, crafted through collaborative discussions with a rapid response team and a nursing education team. A sample of 226 ward nurses from a tertiary general hospital were assessed for CPR knowledge using these questions before undergoing CPR simulation training. The tool’s reliability was measured using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) and confidence intervals, and its validity was determined through difficulty and discrimination indices derived from Item Response Theory. The contrasted group validity was assessed for construction validity. Results: Correlation analysis led to the elimination of three questions with low overall correlation coefficients. Subsequent difficulty and discrimination verification removed five non-discriminatory items. A significant difference in mean scores was found between novice nurses and the rest of the participants (t=2.68, p=.008), highlighting the tool’s construct validity to experience. The final assessment comprised 12 questions on Basic Life Support (BLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and endotracheal intubation knowledge. The KR-20 reliability coefficient was .31, and the average score for all subjects was 8.15±1.66 with a confidence interval of 7.93∼8.36. Conclusion: This tool is expected to secure greater validity through use with a wider range of nurses in future CPR education simulations, enhancing its effectiveness in measuring and improving CPR competencies.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Hegland PA, "Simulation-based training for nurses : systematic review and meta-analysis", Nurse Education Today, 54, pp.6~20 (2017)[DOI]
  2. Onan A, "A review of simulation-enhanced, team-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for undergraduate students", Nurse Education in Practice, 27, pp.134~143 (2017)[DOI]
  3. Adcock S, "Optimizing nursing response to in-hospital cardiac arrest events using in situ simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 49, pp.50~57 (2020)[DOI]
  4. Nascimento JDSG, "Clinical simulation for nursing competence development in cardiopulmonary resuscitation : systematic review", Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 28, pp.e3391~ (2020)[DOI]
  5. Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, "Korea advanced life support", pp.9~122 (2021), KoonJa
  6. Miller C, "Healthcare simulation standards of best PracticeTM outcomes and objectives", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, pp.40~44 (2021)[DOI]
  7. Krathwohl DR, "A revision of bloom's taxonomy : an overview", Theory into Practice, 41(4), pp.212~218 (2002)[DOI]
  8. Shin S, "Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education : meta-analysis", Nurse Education Today, 35(1), pp.176~182 (2015)[DOI]
  9. Mundell WC, "Simulation technology for resuscitation training : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Resuscitation, 84(9), pp.1174~1183 (2013)[DOI]
  10. Riggs M, "Associations between cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)knowledge, self-efficacy, training history and willingness to perform CPR and CPR psychomotor skills : a systematic review", Resuscitation, 138, pp.259~272 (2019)[DOI]
  11. Tivener KA, "The effect of high-fidelity cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)simulation on athletic training student knowledge, confidence, emotions, and experiences", Athletic Training Education Journal, 10(2), pp.103~112 (2015)[DOI]
  12. Everett-Thomas R, "The influence of high fidelity simulation on first responders retention of CPR knowledge", Applied Nursing Research, 30, pp.94~97 (2016)[DOI]
  13. Ackermann AD, "Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), pp.E213~E222 (2009)[DOI]
  14. Madden C, "Undergraduate nursing students' acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills", Nurse Education Today, 26(3), pp.218~227 (2006)[DOI]
  15. Grant EC, "The development and assessment of an evaluation tool for pediatric resident competence in leading simulated pediatric resuscitations", Resuscitation, 83(7), pp.887~893 (2012)[DOI]
  16. Alrashidi N, "Effects of simulation in improving the self-confidence of student nurses in clinical practice : a systematic review", BMC Medical Education, 23(1), pp.815~ (2023)[DOI]
  17. Vincelette C, "Intensive care unit nurses' knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding three resuscitation procedures : a cross-sectional survey", Canadian Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 29(4), pp.29~35 (2018)
  18. Streiner DL, "Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use" (2015), Oxford University Press
  19. Clark LA, "Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology : challenges to the current system and future directions", Annual Review of Psychology, 46, pp.121~153 (1995)[DOI]
  20. Seong TJ, "Understanding and applying item response theory" (2001), Kyoyookbook
  21. Yang TY, "Analyzing the selected items of gifted education with application of item response theory", Journal of Gifted, 2018, pp.28(4), 485~504
  22. Jang KS, "A study on establishment of clinical career development model of nurses", pp.2000
  23. "Assessment and evaluations - Item analysis" (2019)[URL]
  24. El-Uri FI, "Analysis of use of a single best answer format in an undergraduate medical examination", Qatar Medical Journal, 2013(1), pp.3~6 (2013)[DOI]
  25. Kim SY, "How much experience do rescuers require to achieve successful tracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?", Resuscitation, 133, pp.187~192 (2018)[DOI]
  26. Friatma A, "Analysis of validity, reliability, discrimination, difficulty and distraction effectiveness in learning assessment", Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1387, pp.012063~ (2019)[DOI]
  27. Thomas ML, "Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment", Psychological Assessment, 31(12), pp.1442~1455 (2019)[DOI]
  28. Leung K, "Systematic review of instruments for measuring nurses' knowledge, skills and attitudes for evidence-based practice", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(10), pp.2181~2195 (2014)[DOI]
  29. Kim SH, "Development of preventive self-management knowledge related to premature labor(PSMK-PL)scale for women of childbearing age : an item response theory approach", Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 22(9), pp.439~450 (2022)[DOI]
  30. Price CS, "Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training, knowledge and attitudes of newlyqualified doctors in New Zealand in 2003", Resuscitation, 68(2), pp.295~299 (2006)[DOI]
  31. Tavakol M, "Making sense of Cronbach's alpha", International Journal of Medical Education, 2, pp.53~55 (2011)[DOI]
  32. Sok SR, "Effects of a simulationbased CPR training program on knowledge, performance, and stress in clinical nurses", Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 51(5), pp.225~232 (2020)[DOI]
  33. "Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches (Vol 3: Performance and tools)" (2008)[URL]
  34. Kim JG, "Prognostic value of changes in the cardiac arrest rhythms from the prehospital stage to the emergency department in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients without prehospital returns of spontaneous circulation : a nationwide observational study", PLoS One, 16(9), pp.e0257883~ (2021)[DOI]
  35. Cha JY, "Review for development of nursing simulation education evaluation instruments", Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 10(2), pp.47~63 (2022)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)