본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Generated Cephalograms in Children and Adolescents

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

This study investigates the potential of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)- generated cephalograms as a replacement for conventional lateral cephalograms (LCs) in children and adolescents. This retrospective study included 60 individuals, equally divided into permanent and mixed dentition groups. Both groups underwent conventional LCs and CBCT scans on the same day. LCs were then derived from CBCT scans. The same examiner performed digital measurements twice, with a week’s interval, identifying landmarks and obtaining 7 angular and 5 linear measurements. In the permanent dentition group, significant differences were observed between the two imaging modalities for 6 angular and 2 linear measurements. In the mixed dentition group, significant differences were observed for 3 angular and 2 linear measurements. However, none of these differences exceeded the clinically acceptable limit of 2.0º or 2.0 mm. No significant differences in any measurement were found between the two groups (p < 0.05). CBCT-generated LCs demonstrated comparable results with good reliability in both dentition groups, suggesting their potential as suitable alternatives for children and adolescents who require CBCT for clinical purposes.

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)- generated cephalograms as a replacement for conventional lateral cephalograms (LCs) in children and adolescents. This retrospective study included 60 individuals, equally divided into permanent and mixed dentition groups. Both groups underwent conventional LCs and CBCT scans on the same day. LCs were then derived from CBCT scans. The same examiner performed digital measurements twice, with a week’s interval, identifying landmarks and obtaining 7 angular and 5 linear measurements. In the permanent dentition group, significant differences were observed between the two imaging modalities for 6 angular and 2 linear measurements. In the mixed dentition group, significant differences were observed for 3 angular and 2 linear measurements. However, none of these differences exceeded the clinically acceptable limit of 2.0º or 2.0 mm. No significant differences in any measurement were found between the two groups (p < 0.05). CBCT-generated LCs demonstrated comparable results with good reliability in both dentition groups, suggesting their potential as suitable alternatives for children and adolescents who require CBCT for clinical purposes.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Broadbent BH, "A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. The introduction of cephalometric radiography", Angle Orthod, 51, pp.93~114 (1931)
  2. van Vlijmen OJC, "A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 38, pp.773~778 (2009)
  3. Cattaneo PM, "Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.798~802 (2008)
  4. Park CS, "Comparison of conventional lateral cephalograms with corresponding CBCT radiographs", Imaging Sci Dent, 42, pp.201~205 (2012)
  5. Lamichane M, "Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.156~ (2009)
  6. Jung PK, "Comparison of conebeam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements", Korean J Orthod, 45, pp.282~288 (2015)
  7. Mozzo P, "A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique : Preliminary results", Eur Radiol, 8, pp.1558~1564 (1998)
  8. Swennen GRJ, "Three-dimensional cephalometry : Spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.410~416 (2006)
  9. Cevidanes LH, "Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.611~618 (2006)
  10. Chang ZC, "Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.E289~E297 (2011)
  11. Yang S, "Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 43, pp.20140024~ (2014)
  12. Kumar V, "In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.873~879 (2008)
  13. Oz U, "Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 40, pp.492~500 (2011)
  14. Wen J, "Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3imaging modalities", J Am Dent Assoc, 148, pp.913~921 (2017)
  15. Tanikawa C, "Automatic recognition of anatomic features on cephalograms of preadolescent children", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.812~820 (2010)
  16. Kühnisch J, "Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents : an EAPD policy document", Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 21, pp.375~386 (2020)
  17. Kumar V, "Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 36, pp.263~269 (2007)
  18. Sfogliano L, "Cephalometric evaluation of posteroanterior projection of reconstructed three-dimensional Cone beam computed tomography, two-dimensional conventional radiography, and direct measurements", J World Fed Orthod, 5, pp.22~27 (2016)
  19. van Bunningen RH, "Precision of orthodontic cephalometric measurements on ultra low dose-low dose CBCT reconstructed cephalograms", Clin Oral Investig, 26, pp.1543~1550 (2022)
  20. Chung EJ, "Effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms using artificial intelligence cephalometric analysis", Sci Rep, 12, pp.20585~ (2022)
  21. Chen MH, "Intraobserver reliability of landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized two-dimensional cephalograms versus conventional cephalometric radiography : A preliminary study", J Dent Sci, 9, pp.56~62 (2014)
  22. Shaw K, "Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT", J Orthod, 40, pp.22~28 (2013)
  23. Chung RR, "A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms", Int Orthod, 7, pp.308~321 (2009)
  24. Cassetta M, "Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry using cone beam computed tomography scans", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.E311~E315 (2015)
  25. Greiner M, "Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations : Comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs", J Orofac Orthop, 68, pp.290~298 (2007)
  26. van Vlijmen OJ, "Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from conebeam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.92~97 (2009)
  27. Damstra J, "Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.392~395 (2011)
  28. Na ER, "A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans", Korean J Orthod, 49, pp.41~48 (2019)
  29. Moshiri M, "Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.550~560 (2007)
  30. Liedke GS, "Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 41, pp.136~142 (2012)
  31. Navarro RL, "Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses", J Appl Oral Sci, 21, pp.167~176 (2013)
  32. Song MS, "Accuracy of automatic cephalometric analysis programs on lateral cephalograms of preadolescent children", J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 48, pp.245~254 (2021)
  33. Stabrun AE, "Precision in cephalometric landmark indentification", Eur J Orthod, 4, pp.185~196 (1982)
  34. Houston WJ, "The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements", Am J Orthod, 83, pp.382~390 (1983)
  35. Chen YJ, "The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.155~161 (2004)
  36. Savage AW, "Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 91, pp.295~299 (1987)
  37. Chen YJ, "Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.387~392 (2000)
  38. Baumrind S, "The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification", Am J Orthod, 60, pp.111~127 (1971)
  39. Wisth PJ, "The reliability of cephalometric soft tissue measurements", Arch Oral Biol, 20, pp.595~599 (1975)
  40. Bruntz LQ, "A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.340~348 (2006)
  41. da Silva MBG, "Evaluation of the reliability of measurements in cephalograms generated from cone beam computed tomography", Dental Press J Orthod, 18, pp.53~60 (2013)
  42. Grauer D, "Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.286~294 (2010)
  43. Hwang HS, "Use of reference ear plug to improve accuracy of lateral cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans", Korean J Orthod, 43, pp.54~61 (2013)
  44. Duarte H, "Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, pp.393~400 (2009)
  45. Cantekin K, "Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 19, pp.E136~E141 (2014)
  46. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, "Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 116, pp.238~257 (2013)
  47. Shin S, "Comparative validation of the mixed and permanent dentition at web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric analysis", J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 49, pp.85~94 (2022)
  48. Farronato G, ""Ten-point"3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography", Prog Orthod, 11, pp.2~12 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scansAL JAWAD HUSSEIN MUSTAFA SADIQ, Eui-Ri Na, Hyeon-Shik Hwang, Kyung-Min Lee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제1호Comparative Validation of the Mixed and Permanent Dentition at Web-Based Artificial Intelligence Cephalometric Analysis김동현, 신선한대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2022 · 제49권 제1호Accuracy of three-dimensional cephalograms generated using a biplanar imaging system박하연, 이경민, 이재서, 조진형, 황현식대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2018 · 제48권 제5호Use of Reference Ear Plug to improve accuracy of lateral cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scansGi-Soo Uhm, Hyeon-Shik Hwang, James A. McNamara, Jr, Jin-Hyoung Cho, Kyung-Min Lee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2013 · 제43권 제2호Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements문철현, Gung-Chol Lee, Pil-Kyo Jung대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제6호Cone beam computed tomography로 합성된 두부규격 방사선사진에서의 각 계측점의 정확도와 재현성에 관한 연구권대근, 민승기, 전인철, 팽준영대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2010 · 제36권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)