Accuracy of three-dimensional cephalograms generated using a biplanar imaging system
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Biplanar imaging systems allow for simultaneous acquisition of lateral and frontal cephalograms. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements recorded on three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms constructed from two-dimensional conventional radiographs and biplanar radiographs generated using a new biplanar imaging system with those recorded on conebeam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated cephalograms in order to evaluate the accuracy of the 3D cephalograms generated using the biplanar imaging system. Methods: Three sets of lateral and frontal radiographs of 15 human dry skulls with prominent facial asymmetry were obtained using conventional radiography, the biplanar imaging system, and CBCT. To minimize errors in the construction of 3D cephalograms, fiducial markers were attached to anatomical landmarks prior to the acquisition of radiographs. Using the 3D CephTM program, 3D cephalograms were constructed from the images obtained using the biplanar imaging system (3D cephbiplanar), conventional radiography (3D cephconv), and CBCT (3D cephcbct). A total of 34 measurements were obtained compared among the three image sets using paired t-tests and Bland–Altman plotting. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3D cephbiplanar and 3D cephcbct measurements. In addition, with the exception of one measurement, there were no significant differences between the 3D cephcbct and 3D cephconv measurements. However, the values obtained from 3D cephconv showed larger deviations than those obtained from 3D cephbiplanar. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the new biplanar imaging system enables the construction of accurate 3D cephalograms and could be a useful alternative to conventional radiography.
Abstract
Objective: Biplanar imaging systems allow for simultaneous acquisition of lateral and frontal cephalograms. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements recorded on three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms constructed from two-dimensional conventional radiographs and biplanar radiographs generated using a new biplanar imaging system with those recorded on conebeam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated cephalograms in order to evaluate the accuracy of the 3D cephalograms generated using the biplanar imaging system. Methods: Three sets of lateral and frontal radiographs of 15 human dry skulls with prominent facial asymmetry were obtained using conventional radiography, the biplanar imaging system, and CBCT. To minimize errors in the construction of 3D cephalograms, fiducial markers were attached to anatomical landmarks prior to the acquisition of radiographs. Using the 3D CephTM program, 3D cephalograms were constructed from the images obtained using the biplanar imaging system (3D cephbiplanar), conventional radiography (3D cephconv), and CBCT (3D cephcbct). A total of 34 measurements were obtained compared among the three image sets using paired t-tests and Bland–Altman plotting. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3D cephbiplanar and 3D cephcbct measurements. In addition, with the exception of one measurement, there were no significant differences between the 3D cephcbct and 3D cephconv measurements. However, the values obtained from 3D cephconv showed larger deviations than those obtained from 3D cephbiplanar. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the new biplanar imaging system enables the construction of accurate 3D cephalograms and could be a useful alternative to conventional radiography.
참고문헌 (23)
- Bergersen EO, "Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements", Angle Orthod, 50, pp.230~244 (1980)
- Ahlqvist J, "The cephalometric projection. Part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 12, pp.101~108 (1983)[DOI]
- Pil-Kyo Jung, "Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.282~288 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Farman AG, "ALARA still applies", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100, pp.395~397 (2005)[DOI]
- American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs, "The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs", J Am Dent Assoc, 143, pp.899~902 (2012)[DOI]
- . Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, "Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol", 2013, 238~257, 10.1016[DOI]
- Abdelkarim AA, "Appropriate use of ionizing radiation in orthodontic practice and research", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147, pp.166~168 (2015)[DOI]
- Grayson B, "The three-dimensional cephalogram: Theory, techniques, and clinical application", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 94, pp.327~337 (1988)[DOI]
- Brown T, "Computer-assisted location of reference points in three dimensions for radiographic cephalometry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95, pp.490~498 (1989)[DOI]
- Trocme MC, "A biplanar cephalometric stereoradiography technique", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.168~175 (1990)[DOI]
- Bookstein FL, "Landmarks in three dimensions: reconstruction from cephalograms versus direct observation", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.133~140 (1991)[DOI]
- Kusnoto B, "Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, pp.390~399 (1999)[DOI]
- Mori Y, "An accurate three-dimensional cephalometric system: a solution for the correction of cephalic malpositioning", J Orthod, 28, pp.143~149 (2001)[DOI]
- Suh CH, "The fundamentals of computer aided X-ray analysis of the spine", J Biomech, 7, pp.161~169 (1974)[DOI]
- Selvik G, "Roentgen stereophotogrammetry for analysis of cranial growth", Am J Orthod, 89, pp.315~325 (1986)[DOI]
- Baumrind S, "Three-dimensional x-ray stereometry from paired coplanar images: A progress report", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 84, pp.292~312 (1983)[DOI]
- Baumrind S, "The geometry of three-dimensional measurement from paired coplanar x-ray images", Am J Orthod, 84, pp.313~322 (1983)[DOI]
- Cutting C, "Three-dimensional computer-assisted design of craniofacial surgical procedures: optimization and interaction with cephalometric and CT-based models", Plast Reconstr Surg, 77, pp.877~887 (1986)[DOI]
- Selvik G, "Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis", Acta Radiol, 31, pp.113~126 (1990)[DOI]
- Bae GS, "The comparative study of three-dimensional cephalograms to actual models and conventional lateral cephalograma in linear and angular measurements", Korean J Orthod, 27, pp.129~140 (1997)
- Na ER, "Comparison of landmark identification errors between postero-anterior and antero-posterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam CT scan data", pp.2013
- Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement", Lancet, 327, pp.307~310 (1986)[DOI]
- Bland JM, "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies", Stat Methods Med Res, 8, pp.135~160 (1999)[DOI]