본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가표준 예방접종률 조사방법을 이용한 7세 아동의 예방접종률

Immunization Rate among 7 Year Olds (Cohort Born in 2004) using Korean National Immunization Survey Method

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

예방접종은 민간과 공공이 파트너십을 형성하여 감염병 예방이라는 공동의 목표를 가지고 추진하는 것으로 이보다 더 잘 구축된 보건사업 사례는 드물 것이다. 예를 들어 예방접종수첩이라는 동일 정보매개체를 공동으로 사용한다거나 예방접종 약품이나 접종수칙 등을 공동으로 공유한다는 것 등은 다른 보건사업에서는매우 드문 일이다. 이러한많은 노력을통하여이연구결과에서 보는 바와 같이 예방접종은 단기간에 큰 성과를 거두었다. 그러나 지금까지 예방접종사업이 성공적이라 손치더라도 새로운 백신 제형이나 혼합백신의 출현, 새롭게개발된백신의높은가격, 낮은추가접종률, 성인의 낮은 접종률, 지역간 또는 집단간 접종률 차이등 도전해야 할 과제는 아직도 산적해 있다. 예방접종으로 예방 가능한 감염병을 퇴치 수준으로관리하고, 국가간예방접종률을비교하기위해서각국가들은 다양한 방법을 통하여 예방접종률을 조사하고그 결과를 반영하여 국가 정책을 수립하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 기초는 물론 추가 접종까지 포함한 예방접종률을파악할수 있도록조사대상연령을 7세아동으로 하여 우리나라의 국가 및 시도 단위의 예방접종률을 측정할 수 있는 국가표준 조사방법을 결정하고, 이를 통하여 실제 예방접종률을 측정하여 경시적으로 비교할 수있는토대를마련하였다. 본연구의 주요조사방법과 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 국가공식예방접종률통계생산을위하여표준예방접종률 조사방법을 개발하여 예방접종전문위원회심의와 통계청의국가승인통계(승인번호 제01204호) 를받는등공식화된절차를거쳤다. 조사대상자는7세아동, 목표모집단은 주민등록인구, 조사모집단은 예방접종등록관리 정보시스템에 등록된 아동으로 하였다. 최소 표본수 산출시 5%p 정밀도, 95% 신뢰수준, 50 %접종률을고려하였으며총조사대상자수는6,700명이었다. 조사기간은 2012년 6월 28일부터 9월 20일(총 85일간), 조사방법은 전화조사, 조사자료원은 예방접종수첩이었다. 둘째, 국가필수예방접종의 접종별, 차수별 예방접종률은 BCG 1회 99.6%, B형간염 1차99.4%, B형간염 2차 99.4%, B형간염 3차 98.8%, DTaP 1차 99.9%, DTaP 2차 99.8%, DTaP 3차99.5%, DTaP 4차98.2%, DTaP 5차91.0%, 폴리오1차 99.7%, 폴리오 2차99.5%, 폴리오3차 99.1 %, 폴리오 4차 90.2%, MMR 1차 99.7%, MMR 2차97.3%, 수두 1회 96.5%, 일본뇌염 1차 99.3%, 일본뇌염2차98.1%, 일본뇌염 3차91.3%, 일본뇌염4차79.7%로 나타났다. 셋째, 국가필수예방접종의 접종별 완전 접종률은 B 형간염(3회) 98.6%, DTaP (3회) 99.5%, DTaP (4회) 98.1%, DTaP (5회) 90.5%, 폴리오(3회) 98.9%, 폴리오(4회) 90.0%, MMR (2회) 97.2%, 일본뇌염(불활성화백신3회, 약독화생백신2회) 85.2 %, 일본뇌염(불활성화백신 4회, 약독화 생백신 3회) 69.9%로 나타났다. 또한 시리즈별 완전 접종률은 3: 3:3:1 (1세시기완전접종률) 시리즈는97.4%, 4:3:1 시리즈는 97.3%, 4:3:1:3:1 시리즈는 96.1%, 4:3:1: 3:1:1 시리즈는93.0%, 4:3:1:3:1:1:3 (3세 시기 완전 접종률) 시리즈는 80.4%, 5:4:2:3:1:1 시리즈는80.9%, 5:4:2:3:1:1:4 (6세시기 완전 접종률) 시리즈는 60.0%로 나타났다.

Abstract

Objectives: Vaccinations are recommended throughout life to prevent vaccine-preventable diseases and their sequelae. The various efforts for effective vaccination came huge outcomes in short periods. These experience in health program is very rare. But the problems are many in front of vaccinations, for examples, development new vaccines or combo vaccine with high price, low coverage of booster vaccines, difference in vaccination rate between regions or population groups. So there are too many challenging problems to solve. To measure immunization rate is very important because we can know adequate vaccination status for reducing communicable disease occurrence. So lots of nations survey vaccination coverage with various measuring methods, and develop immunization policy and program following to these survey results. This study has two goals. the first goal is to develop standard Korean National Immunization Survey method among 7 year olds in national and metropolitan level, and the other goal is to measure real status. Methods: We carried out the formal process for confirm standard survey method as a national standard, and went through Korean national advisory committee for vaccination and then Statistics Korea. And we performed the computer aided telephone interview (CATI)). The source of information is household-retained vaccination cards. The survey population is 6,700 at 7 year olds (cohort born in 2004) who registered in national immunization registry information system. The unit of sampling is each metropolitan and provincial area using minimum sample size determination method (precision 5%p, confidence interval 95%, assumed coverage rate 50%). Results: The national vaccination coverage per dose was 1 dose BCG 99.6%, 1st dose Hepatitis B 99.4%, 2nd dose Hepatitis B 99.4%, 3rd dose Hepatitis B 98.8%, 1st DTaP 99.9%, 2nd dose DTaP 99.8%, 3rd dose DTaP 99.5%, 4th dose DTaP 98.2%, 5th dose DTaP 91.0%, 1st dose poliovirus 99.7%, 2nd dose poliovirus 99.5%, 3rd dose poliovirus 99.1%, 4th dose poliovirus 90.2%, 1st dose MMR 99.7%, 2nd dose MMR 97.3%, 1 dose varicella 96.5%, 1st dose Japanese encephalitis 99.3%,2nd dose Japanese encephalitis 98.1%, 3rd dose Japanese encephalitis 91.3%, 4th dose Japanese encephalitis 79.7%. In completeness for each vaccine, total 3 doses of Hepatitis B was estimated at 98.6%, 3 doses of DTaP 99.5%, 4 doses of DTaP 98.1%, 5 doses of DTaP 90.5%, 3 doses poliovirus of 98.9%, 4 doses poliovirus of 90.0%, 2 doses MMR of 97.2%. And series vaccination coverage was 97.4% at 3:3:3:1 (3DTaP, 3Polio, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG=coverage at 1 year), 97.3% at 4:3:1 (4DTaP, 3Polio, 1MMR), 96.1% at 4:3:1:3:1 (4DTaP, 3Polio, 1MMR, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG),93.0% at 4:3:1:3:1:1 (4DTaP, 3Polio, 1MMR, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG, 1Varicella), 80.4% at 4:3:1:3:1:1:3 (4DTaP, 3Polio, 1MMR, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG, 1Varicella, 3 (or2) JEV=coverage at 3 year),80.9% at 5:4:2:3:1:1 (5DTaP, 4Polio, 2MMR, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG, 1Varicella), 60.0% at 5:4:2:3:1:1:4 (5DTaP, 4Polio, 2MMR, 3Hepatitis B, 1BCG, 1Varicella, 4 (or3) Japanese encephalitis=coverage at 6 year). Conclusions: The Korean vaccination coverage rates among 7 year olds revealed relatively high than we were expected in terms of the herd immunity except a some series vaccinations. To measure more accurate national vaccination coverage rate, our nation must have adequate national immunization registry system. So, we can obtain accurate and timely individual immunization history.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Brownson RC, "Evidence-based public health", pp.146~147 (2003), Oxford University Press
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Immunization registry use and progress–United States, 2001", MMWR, 51, pp.53~56 (2002)
  3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "National, state and local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months - United States, 2011", MMWR, 61(35), pp.599~696 (2012)
  4. Crowcroft NS, "Action on immunization. No data, no action", Arch Dis Child, 94, pp.829~830 (2009)
  5. Department of Health and Ageing, "Immunisation coverage annual report, 2009", Communicable Diseases Intelligence, 35(2), pp.132~148 (2011)
  6. Fairbrother G, "Measuring immunization coverage", American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(3), pp.78~88 (2000)
  7. Hinman AR, "Vaccinepreventable disease, immunization, and MMWR- 1961-2011", MMWR, 60, pp.49~53 (2011)
  8. Hull BP, "The Australian Childhood Immunisation Register - a model for universal immunization registers?", Vaccine, 27(37), pp.5054~5060 (2009)
  9. National survey on fertility, family health and welfare in Korea, "Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs", Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~ (2009)
  10. 이석구, "국가표준 예방접종률 조사방법을 이용한 3세 아동의 예방접종률", 한국모자보건학회지, 17(1), pp.62~78 (2013), 한국모자보건학회
  11. 이석구, "필수예방접종비용 지원 수준별 전산등록의 질적 차이*", 한국모자보건학회지, 16(1), pp.113~121 (2012), 한국모자보건학회
  12. Papania M, "For better immunization coverage, measure coverage better", Lancet, 367, pp.925~926 (2006)
  13. 박보영, "Estimation of Nationwide Vaccination Coverage and Comparison of Interview and Telephone Survey Methodology for Estimating Vaccination Status", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 26(6), pp.711~719 (2011), 대한의학회
  14. Nationwide vaccine coverage level; conceptual methodology and survey, "Park SK", Seoul National University, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1~239 (2009)
  15. Development of vaccination coverage estimation methods and evaluation indicators of national immunization program in Korea, "Shin EC", Catholic University, Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1~332 (2005)
  16. NHS immunisation statistics England 2009-10, "The NHS Information Centre", The NHS Information Centre, 7~76 (2010)
  17. Immunization coverage estimates, data as of July, "WHO", UNICEF, 2011
  18. World Development Report 1993; investing in health, "World Development Report", Oxford University Press, 8~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)