본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

르봐이예분만군과 일반질식분만군의 분만경험지각, 분만통증, 신생아 통증반응 및 모성애착행위 비교

Comparison of the Leboyer Childbirth Method with Normal Vaginal Delivery: Mothers' Perception of Childbirth Experience, Labor Pain, Newborn's Pain Response and Maternal Attachment Behaviors

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구는 르봐이예분만군과 일반질식분만군의 분만경험지각, 분만통증, 신생아통증반응 및모성애착행위정도를 비교하기 위하여 D시에 위치한 여성전문병원중에서월 분만 100건 이상의30병상 이상의병원중A, B, C 3곳을 임의 선정하여 르봐이예분만군 41명, 일반질식분만군 33명, 총 74명을 대상으로 자료수집하였다. A병원에서는 르봐이예분만법을적용하였으며, 나머지 B와 C병원에서는 르봐이예분만법외의 일반질식분만을 적용하였다. 2010년2월 28일부터 2010년4월15일까지약3개월간자료수집하였으며, 그결과는 아래와 같다. 분만경험지각은 르봐이예분만군이 평균 91.02점으로일반질식분만군의69.64점보다유의하게높았다(t= 7.47, p<.001). 분만전통증에서는르봐이예분만군이평균8.95점, 일반질식분만군 9.06점으로 유의한 차이가 없었으나(t=-0.32, p=.743), 분만후 통증에서는 르봐이예군과 일반질식분만군이 각각 평균 3.391점과 5.15점으로 참여군이 통계적으로 유의하게 통증이 낮았다(t= -2.51, p=.014). 신생아 통증반응은 르봐이예분만군(M=3.07)이 일반질식분만군(M=4.27)에비해 통계적으로 유의하게낮았다(t=-5.15, p<.001). 모성애착행위는 르봐이예분만군이 평균 16.95점, 일반질식분만군이 8.70점으로 르봐이예군이유의하게높았으며(t=10.39, p<.001), 구체적으로 살펴보면, 동일시는르봐이예분만군이평균7.32점으로일반질식분만군의3.85점보다 유의하게높았으며(t=8.00, p< .001), 상호작용도 르봐이예분만군이 평균 9.63점으로일반질식분만군의4.85점보다유의하게높았다(t= 10.46, p<.001). 결론적으로 르봐이예분만군은 일반질식분만군에 비해산모의분만경험지각이긍정적이었으며, 모성애착행위정도가높았고, 산부의산후분만통증과신생아통증정도가 낮았다. 따라서 앞으로 르봐이예분만법을 배우자에게 교육하여 그 효과를 확인하는 연구를 제언하며 또한 르봐이예분만법의 효과연구를 위해 연구조건을 잘 통제한 실험연구디자인에의한반복연구를제언한다. 본연구는일개지역을 대상으로 작은 수의 표본을 대상으로 시행하였으므로 우리나라 전체의 산모로 일반화 하는 데는 한계가 있다. 지역을 확대하고 많은 수의 산모를 대상자로 하여 효과를 검증하는 반복연구를 제언한다.

Abstract

Objectives: The Leboyer childbirth method is known as less stressful and humane delivery method for both mothers and newborns. The objectives of this study was to compare the Leboyer childbirth method with normal vaginal delivery in terms of mothers’ perception of the childbirth experience,labor pain, newborn's pain response and maternal attachment behaviors. Materials and Methods: Sample of this study included forty one mothers in the Leboyer group and thirty three normal delivery mothers from two women's hospitals during the period of 28th February to 15th April 2010. All mothers completed questionnaires including the Marut and Mercer's perception of childbirth experience, 0~10 numeric scale of labor pain, Lawrence's newborn pain response, and Cropley, Lester, Pennington's maternal attachment behaviors. Results: The findings indicated significantly higher scores for mothers’ with the Leboyer method of childbirth on the Perception of Childbirth Experience (t=7.47, p<.001) and on maternal attachment behaviors (t=10.39, p<.001) and lower scores on maternal post-labor pain (t=-2.51, p=.014) as well as on the newborn's pain (t=-5.15, p<.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups for pre-labor pain. Conclusion: Mothers with Leboyer childbirth method reported more positive maternal childbirth experiences, maternal attachment behavior, and less newborn's pain response and less post-labor pain than mothers in the comparison group with the exception of pre-labor pain.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Ainsworth M, "The development of mother-infant attchment. Review of Child Delevopment Research", pp.1~94 (1973), University of Chicago Press
  2. Croplay C, "Assessment tool for measuring maternal attachment behaviors", Current Practice in Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, 1, pp.16~28 (1976)
  3. Jang MH, "The birth project : The commercialized and individualized way of birth-process in South Korea since late 1990s", pp.2006
  4. Jang MJ, "Effect of Family-Participated Delivery in a Labor Delivery Room on the Childbirth of Primiparas", Korean J Women Health Nurs, 8(3), pp.371~379 (2002)
  5. Hur MH., "Effects of one-to-one Labor Support on Labor Pain, Labor Stress Response, Childbirth Experience and Neonatal Status for Primipara", Korean J Women Health Nurs, 7(1), pp.188~202 (2001)
  6. Hwang EJ, "Comparison of Paternal Attachment and Role Confidence to Newborn Between Participation Group and Non-Participation Group in Family Delivery Room", pp.2003
  7. Kim HJ, "The labor and birth in the physiological aspects of mental", Seminar Gentle Birth, pp.107~116 (2001)
  8. Kim KY, "Effects on Maternal-Infant Attachment by the Taegyo Perspective Prenatal Class", pp.2000
  9. Kim YK, "The effect of back massage on labor pain, labor duration and childbirth experience in women during labor", pp.2007
  10. "2008 Birth statistics" (2009)[URL]
  11. Kroeger M, "Impact of birthing practices on breastfeeding: Protecting the mother and baby continuum" (2004), Jones and Bartlett
  12. Lawrence J, "The development of tool to assess neonatal pain", Neonatal Network, 12, pp.59~66 (1993)
  13. Leboyer F, "Birth without Violence" (1974), Random House
  14. Lee KH, "Maternity & Women Health nursing" (2010), Hyunmoon
  15. 이군자, "분만중 시행한 전신마사지가 신생아 아프가 점수, 분만경험 및 모아애착 반응에 미치는 효과", Child Health Nursing Research, 9(4), pp.359~367 (2003), 아동간호학회
  16. Maurt JS, "Comparison of primiparas' perceptions of vaginal and cesarean births", Nursing Research, 28(5), pp.260~266 (1979)
  17. 오정혜, "출산준비교육과 가족분만이 초산모의 불안, 분만진통 및 분만경험지각에 미치는 효과", 임상간호연구, 12(2), pp.145~156 (2006), 병원간호사회
  18. 박광희, "일개대학병원 가족분만실에서 듈라(Doula)식 분만지지간호가 초산부의 불안, 분만통증 및 분만경험지각에 미치는 효과", 임상간호연구, 14(3), pp.87~97 (2008), 병원간호사회
  19. Pascali-Bonaro D, "Continuous female companionship during childbirth: A crucial resource in times of stress or calm", Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 49(4), pp.19~27 (2004)
  20. 윤혜봉, "신생아의 통증완화를 위한 자당(sucrose) 경구투여 효과", Child Health Nursing Research, 7(1), pp.35~50 (2001), 아동간호학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)