조산사가 주도하는 자연주의 출산의 주산기 결과에 대한 조사연구: 후향적 연구
A Study on the Perinatal Outcomes of Natural Childbirth Led by Midwives: A Retrospective Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest the importance of natural childbirth by investigating the results of midwife-led perinatal periods and whether they were positive experiences for both individual women and their families. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to confirm the perinatal outcomes of midwife-attended vaginal births. Among 1,127 women who gave midwife-led birth in Gyeonggi-do, Seoul between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021, data were collected for 829 women. Records were excluded that were missing necessary data. Data on childbirth were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the chi-square test. Results: Among the mothers who underwent natural childbirth, 549 (66.2%) were multiparous. In addition, all 829 patients (100%) breast-fed their infants. First-degree perineal lacerations occurred in 29.2% of patients, and second-degree lacerations occurred in 48%. Non–high-risk subjects made up 56.0% of the study sample. The average bleeding amount was 281.44±4.50, and the average 1-minute Apgar score for infants was 8.25±0.02. Conclusion: Compared to childbirth in a hospital, natural childbirth was associated with a lower risk of birth canal laceration, postpartum bleeding, and Cesarean section. In addition, the health statuses of the newborns were confirmed to be good . Based on the results of this study, there is a need for a strategy in which midwife-led natural childbirth is integrated into the local medical system, as well as a need to raise women's awareness of natural childbirth and positively influence the experience.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest the importance of natural childbirth by investigating the results of midwife-led perinatal periods and whether they were positive experiences for both individual women and their families. Methods: This retrospective study aimed to confirm the perinatal outcomes of midwife-attended vaginal births. Among 1,127 women who gave midwife-led birth in Gyeonggi-do, Seoul between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021, data were collected for 829 women. Records were excluded that were missing necessary data. Data on childbirth were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the chi-square test. Results: Among the mothers who underwent natural childbirth, 549 (66.2%) were multiparous. In addition, all 829 patients (100%) breast-fed their infants. First-degree perineal lacerations occurred in 29.2% of patients, and second-degree lacerations occurred in 48%. Non–high-risk subjects made up 56.0% of the study sample. The average bleeding amount was 281.44±4.50, and the average 1-minute Apgar score for infants was 8.25±0.02. Conclusion: Compared to childbirth in a hospital, natural childbirth was associated with a lower risk of birth canal laceration, postpartum bleeding, and Cesarean section. In addition, the health statuses of the newborns were confirmed to be good . Based on the results of this study, there is a need for a strategy in which midwife-led natural childbirth is integrated into the local medical system, as well as a need to raise women's awareness of natural childbirth and positively influence the experience.
참고문헌 (14)
- Chang CY, "Effects of non-pharmacological coping strategies for reducing labor pain : a systematic review and network meta-analysis", PLoS One, 17, pp.e0261493~ (2022)
- Grünebaum A, "Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016–2019", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 226, pp.116.e1~116.e7 (2022)
- Hutton EK, "Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital : a systematic review and meta-analyses", EClinicalMedicine, 14, pp.59~70 (2019)[DOI]
- Jardine J, "Risk of complicated birth at term in nulliparous and multiparous women using routinely collected maternity data in England : cohort study", BMJ, 371, pp.m3377~ (2020)[DOI]
- 김경원, "자연주의 출산한 여성의 출산실태와 회음부 손상: 일개 자연주의 출산 병원 의무기록을 중심으로", 여성건강간호학회지, 27(4), pp.379~387 (2021), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- "Place and method of delivery for married women (15-49 years old)" (2019)[URL]
- 이선옥, "조산원 분만 산모의 분만통증, 분만통제감이분만경험지각에 미치는 영향", 한국모자보건학회지, 22(3), pp.142~150 (2018), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
- Nethery E, "Birth outcomes for planned home and licensed freestanding birth center births in Washington State", Obstet Gynecol, 138, pp.693~702 (2021)[DOI]
- 박지미, "자연주의 출산에서 간호사 주도 듈라지지 프로그램 개발 및 효과: 예비 연구", 한국모자보건학회지, 23(4), pp.269~279 (2019), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
- 박미란, "조산원과 병원 분만 산모의 재원일 수, 의료비용, 산후불편감과 의료서비스 만족도 비교", 여성건강간호학회지, 24(1), pp.24~32 (2018), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
- Reitsma A, "Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital : a systematic review and meta-analyses", EClinicalMedicine, 21, pp.100319~ (2020)
- Rossi AC, "Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy : a systematic review with metaanalysis", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 222, pp.102~108 (2018)
- "Postpartum care survey: whether or not breastfeeding is attempted within 24 hours of birth" (2021)[URL]
- "Newroom: Infant and young child feeding" (2020)[URL]