하곡학 관점에서 본 李匡臣과 李匡呂 사상

Abstract

Lee Kuangshin’s thought is considered as a differentiation from the doctrines of Chu-tzu and the doctrines of Wang Yangming. He tried to establish Yangming through this process. His differentiation from the doctrines of Chu-tzu and the doctrines of Wang Yangming is as follows; First of all, there is the question of the front and the rear order in eight chapter of the Great learning. Chu-tzu insists that there is the front and the rear order, otherwise Wang Yangming tells it happens simultaneously. Second, the question of the relation between the subdivision or combination of Mind and Li(理) and a knowledge and conduct(知行). Chu-tzu insists the importance of the subdivision of Mind and Li and keeping abreast of knowledge and conduct(知行竝進). However, Wang Yangming claims that the importance of the combination of Mind and Li(心理合) and the uniting knowledge and conduct(知行合一). Finally, it is divided that human nature is Li(性卽理) and Mind is Li(心卽理) because of self-cultivation. Precisely speaking, it is more important the view from Mind is Li or Qi(氣) than that of ‘human nature is Li and Mind is Li(心卽理) because of self-cultivation. Lee Kuanglyee mentions the good knowledge(良知), the sincere mind(實心), and the investigation of things and extension of Knowledge(格物致知) from his ‘quotations from Woram.’ However, Lee Kuanglyee focuses on an additional explanation than his own viewpoint. Lee Kuangshin tries to explain the differentiation from the doctrines of Chu-tzu and the doctrines of Wang Yangming. But, he did not succeed to his purpose due to his short knowledge of Mind(心). Lee Kuanglyee did not explain the main concept of Yangming and Hagok school. In this respect, Lee Kuangshin and Lee Kuanglyee are failed to develop Yangming and Hagok school’s philosophy, even though they are successors of those school. However, their effort to this differentiation on both doctrines should be evaluated.