본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어와 이탈리아어의 외래어 표기법 비교연구

A comparative study of writing system for Russian and Italian loanwords in Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류인지과학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to analyze current system for writingloanwords, especially Russian and Italian, and propose some suggestions. There have been many studies to raise problems of system for writingloanwords. One of them is to write voiceless plosives of all loanwordsas aspirated ones in Korean, regardless of typological differences. It is wellknown that Russian and Italian belong to a [voice] language, whereasEnglish belong to a [aspirated] language. Actually, Russian and Italianplosives are pronounced as Korean tense plosives, but English ones arepronounced as Korean aspirated. In spite of their difference, currentsystem for writing loanwords does not show this difference. And currentwriting system for geminates is not sufficient to represent Italiangeminates. In Italian, a lot of gemintes have their phonological position,phoneme. Writing system can't represent its various geminates, except-mm-, -nn-. Writing system for loanwords must keep the rule of Koreanwriting system as well as show distinctive characteristic of origin words. So I propose two suggestions to revise current writing system. One is tointroduce the principle that permits transcription of tense plosives forvoiceless plosives in Russian and Italian. The other is to permit wideadaptation of geminates in writing system for Italians loanwords.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze current system for writingloanwords, especially Russian and Italian, and propose some suggestions. There have been many studies to raise problems of system for writingloanwords. One of them is to write voiceless plosives of all loanwordsas aspirated ones in Korean, regardless of typological differences. It is wellknown that Russian and Italian belong to a [voice] language, whereasEnglish belong to a [aspirated] language. Actually, Russian and Italianplosives are pronounced as Korean tense plosives, but English ones arepronounced as Korean aspirated. In spite of their difference, currentsystem for writing loanwords does not show this difference. And currentwriting system for geminates is not sufficient to represent Italiangeminates. In Italian, a lot of gemintes have their phonological position,phoneme. Writing system can't represent its various geminates, except-mm-, -nn-. Writing system for loanwords must keep the rule of Koreanwriting system as well as show distinctive characteristic of origin words. So I propose two suggestions to revise current writing system. One is tointroduce the principle that permits transcription of tense plosives forvoiceless plosives in Russian and Italian. The other is to permit wideadaptation of geminates in writing system for Italians loanwords.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Abdelli-Beruh, N., "The stop voicing contrast in French sentences: contextual sensitivity of vowel duration, closure duration, voice onset time, stop release and closure voicing", Phonetica, 61, pp.201~219 (2004)
  2. Bertinetto, P. M., "The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome", Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), pp.131~151 (2005)
  3. Cohn, A. C., "The phonetic realization of singleton-geminate contrast in three languages of Indonesia", Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp.587~609 (1999)
  4. Hankamer, J., "Perception of consonant length: Voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali", Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), pp.283~298 (1989)
  5. Harris, J, "English Sound Structure" (1994), Blackwell
  6. Honeybone, P, "The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments" (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
  7. Iverson, G. K., "Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic", Phonology, 12, pp.369~396 (1995)
  8. Kramer, M., "The Phonology of Italian" (2009), Oxford University Press
  9. Kulikov, V., "Voicing and voice assimilation in Russian stops", 박사, pp.2012
  10. Ladefoged, P., "The Sounds of the World’ Languages" (1996), Blackwell Publishers
  11. Lahiri, A., "The timing of geminate consonants", Journal of Phonetics, 16, pp.327~338 (1988)
  12. Lisker, L., "A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustic measurements", Word, 20, pp.384~422 (1964)
  13. "외래어 표기법", 국립국어연구원[URL]
  14. 국어연구소, "외래어 표기 용례집(지명, 인명)" (1985), 문교부
  15. 김민수, "국어정책론" (1973), 고려대 출판부
  16. 임홍빈, "외래어의 개념과 그 표기법의 형성과 원리", 한국어문학논고, pp.725~749 (1996)
  17. 장한업, "불어의 한글 표기상 문제점과 개선안", 프랑스어문교육, (13), pp.1~17 (2002), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
  18. 정희원, "외래어의 개념과 범위", 새국어생활, 14(2) (2004)
  19. 조문환, "이탈리아어 한글표기규정 개선방안 연구", 이탈리아어문학, (32), pp.109~131 (2011), 한국이탈리아어문학회
  20. 최문정, "러시아어 고유명사의 한글 표기법 비교 연구", 슬라브학보, 16, pp.27~59 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)