본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「동야휘집」의 중국 필기소설 전유와 그 의미

A Study on Dongyawhijip's Appropriation of Chinese Novel and Its Meaning

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

I would argue that Dongyawhijip appropriated chinese Pilgi-novel, Iwajeon and Haetak.. This paper analysed the Dongyawhijip's appropriation strategy. By appropriating Iwajeon, Dongyawhijip shows us the special experience in the geisha house of Peking, which extended the realistic space of Yadam. Lee Wonmeong, the editor of Dongyawhijip, appropriated Haetak by using much more diverse methods. It became possible in the condition that Lee Wonmeong thought the recording of Yadam as a kind of Sadaebu's writing. Two distinctive methods were employed by Lee Wonmeong in his appropriation of Chinese Pilgi-novels. Firstly, Lee inserted the whole or part of Chinese Pilgi-novels into the parts of Chosun Yadam in order to make its theme and characters more impressive. Secondly, Lee Wonmeong appropriated the forms of Chinese Pilgi-novels. By parodying the forms of Chinese Pilgi-novels, Lee Wonmeong widened the appropriation scope of Dongyawhijip. Metaphors were hard to find in Chosun Yadam, whjch presented serious problems to the writers of realistic Yadam. Consequently Lee Wonmeong appropriated Chinese Pilgi-novels to solve this problem. Lee Wonmeong attempted to bring serious ideas to the soft and enjoyable Yadam. Yadam was narrated by a realistic rhetoric, because Yadam was rooted in the real experiences of people. However, as public recitation of Yadam grew more and more popular, its realistic rhetoric sounded dull to the people. So Lee Wonmeong tried to find a way to renew Yadam, which made him turn to Chinese Pilgi-novels. In the earlier time, Yadam tended to construct the moralistic themes based on the realistic or historic experiences in rather serious ways. With Lee Wonmeong's appropriation of Iwajeon and Haetak into Dongyawhijip, satire and allegory became the most important rhetoric of Yadam, which, I would argue, is the greatest achievement of Lee's appropriation of Chinese Philgi-novel.

Abstract

I would argue that Dongyawhijip appropriated chinese Pilgi-novel, Iwajeon and Haetak.. This paper analysed the Dongyawhijip's appropriation strategy. By appropriating Iwajeon, Dongyawhijip shows us the special experience in the geisha house of Peking, which extended the realistic space of Yadam. Lee Wonmeong, the editor of Dongyawhijip, appropriated Haetak by using much more diverse methods. It became possible in the condition that Lee Wonmeong thought the recording of Yadam as a kind of Sadaebu's writing. Two distinctive methods were employed by Lee Wonmeong in his appropriation of Chinese Pilgi-novels. Firstly, Lee inserted the whole or part of Chinese Pilgi-novels into the parts of Chosun Yadam in order to make its theme and characters more impressive. Secondly, Lee Wonmeong appropriated the forms of Chinese Pilgi-novels. By parodying the forms of Chinese Pilgi-novels, Lee Wonmeong widened the appropriation scope of Dongyawhijip. Metaphors were hard to find in Chosun Yadam, whjch presented serious problems to the writers of realistic Yadam. Consequently Lee Wonmeong appropriated Chinese Pilgi-novels to solve this problem. Lee Wonmeong attempted to bring serious ideas to the soft and enjoyable Yadam. Yadam was narrated by a realistic rhetoric, because Yadam was rooted in the real experiences of people. However, as public recitation of Yadam grew more and more popular, its realistic rhetoric sounded dull to the people. So Lee Wonmeong tried to find a way to renew Yadam, which made him turn to Chinese Pilgi-novels. In the earlier time, Yadam tended to construct the moralistic themes based on the realistic or historic experiences in rather serious ways. With Lee Wonmeong's appropriation of Iwajeon and Haetak into Dongyawhijip, satire and allegory became the most important rhetoric of Yadam, which, I would argue, is the greatest achievement of Lee's appropriation of Chinese Philgi-novel.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 심기봉, "『해탁』, 『필기소설대관』(筆記小說大觀) 3, 新興書局 有限公司, 民國 67年", ~
  2. 李娃傳, "태평광기" (1982), 계명문화사영인
  3. 이원명, "原本 東野彙輯 , 상, 하", 寶庫社
  4. 기문총화, "한국야담자료집성" (1987), 고문헌연구회
  5. "청구야담 , 상, 하" (1988), 아세아문화사
  6. 청야담수, "한국야담자료집성" (1987), 고문헌연구회
  7. "輿地圖書 , 상" (1973), 국사편찬위원회
  8. 두정님, "동야휘집 , 연구", 석사, pp.1990
  9. 소의평, "두붕한화 : 中國古典小說中的?架結構", 중국어문학 (1997), 영남중국어문학회
  10. 유몽인, "어우야담", 돌베개
  11. 윤세순, "동야휘집 의 성격 고찰- 어우야담의 수용양상을 통해서", 석사, pp.1991
  12. 이강옥, "동야휘집의 ,해탁, 수용 양상", 구비문학연구 (1995), 한국구비문학회
  13. 이강옥, "조선후기야담집연구", 석사, pp.1982
  14. 이강옥, "한국야담연구" (2006), 돌베개
  15. 이병찬, "동야휘집 연구" (2005), 보고사
  16. 이종묵, "놀이로서의 한시- 버클리대학 소장 규방미담閨房美談에 대하여" (2006), 문헌과 해석
  17. 임완혁, "문헌전승에 의한 야담의 변모양상: 동패락송과 계서야담, 청구야담, 동야휘집의 관계를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1997
  18. 조희웅, "조선후기 문헌설화의 연구" (1980), 형설출판사
  19. 홍성남, "동야휘집연구-기문총화 수용을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1992

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)