본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

발트 벤야민의 사진론에 관한 해석

Interpretation for Walter Benjamin's Photo Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타예술체육

초록

Walter Benjamin, born on July 15, 1892. He said that the modern way of perception could be characterized by sterilizing an aura as a traditional way of experience on premise that photographs brought about an epoch - making change not only to the overall nature of arts but also to the way that humans perceived the world itself. From the invention of photography through 100 years of history connected with his concept of the aura were separated by description, existence of the technical aura, remain of the artificial aura, extinct of the aura. Formed from an ancient cult, with aura in an authoritarian tradition to modern works of art have been handed down, the tradition of invention, the picture continued for a period of 10 years earlier on the basis of the arrival of a malleable narrative that was when the picture. Benjamin was a Marxist leftist thinkers society divided into the superstructure and substructure and infrastructure, depending on the flow of time is always changing but always unchanged superstructure has the power to suppress the infrastructure that was critical. He superstructure with an aura of power, the phenomenon is connected with the tradition and understanding. He means for producing a new image from photos and movies were the possibilities for social transformation.

Abstract

Walter Benjamin, born on July 15, 1892. He said that the modern way of perception could be characterized by sterilizing an aura as a traditional way of experience on premise that photographs brought about an epoch - making change not only to the overall nature of arts but also to the way that humans perceived the world itself. From the invention of photography through 100 years of history connected with his concept of the aura were separated by description, existence of the technical aura, remain of the artificial aura, extinct of the aura. Formed from an ancient cult, with aura in an authoritarian tradition to modern works of art have been handed down, the tradition of invention, the picture continued for a period of 10 years earlier on the basis of the arrival of a malleable narrative that was when the picture. Benjamin was a Marxist leftist thinkers society divided into the superstructure and substructure and infrastructure, depending on the flow of time is always changing but always unchanged superstructure has the power to suppress the infrastructure that was critical. He superstructure with an aura of power, the phenomenon is connected with the tradition and understanding. He means for producing a new image from photos and movies were the possibilities for social transformation.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 그램 질로크, "발터멘야민과 메트로 폴리스" (2007), 효형출판
  2. 김광남, "벤야민의 미학에서 아우라의 몰락과 지각의 변화", ~ (2005)
  3. 김상현, "판단력 비판" (2005), 책세상
  4. 김영범, "철학갤러리" (2009), 풀로엮은집
  5. 로잘린드 클라우스, "사진, 인덱스, 현대미술" (2003)
  6. 박설호, "발터 벤야민의 “아우라” 개념에 대하여", 브레히트와 현대연극, 9 (2001), 한국브레히트학회
  7. 발터 벤야민, "발터벤야민의 문예이론" (1983), 민음사
  8. 발터 벤야민, "기술복제세대의 예술작품 사진의 작은 역사 외" (2007), 도서풀판 길
  9. 발터벤야민, "현대사회와 예술" (1988), 문학과 지성사
  10. 백유진, "컬트영화에 나타난 패션디자인의 미적 고찰" (2006), 홍익대학교
  11. 뷰먼트 뉴홀, "사진의 역사" (1987), 열화당
  12. 빌렘 플루스, "사진의 철학을 위하여" (2008), 커뮤니케이션북스
  13. 심혜련, "대중매체에 관한 발터 벤야민의 미학적 고찰이 지니는 현대적 의의", 미학, 30 (2001), 한국미학회
  14. 요한네스 휠시베르크, "서양철학사" (2003), 이문출판사
  15. 이경률, "사진의 여명" (2006), 사진마실
  16. 임마뉴엘 칸트, "순수이성 비판" (2007), 아카넷
  17. 진중권, "진중권의 현대미학 강의" (2003), 아트북스
  18. 진중권, "미학 오디세이" (2004), 휴머니스트
  19. 질 들뢰즈, "차이와 반복" (2009), 민음사
  20. 헤겔, "헤겔미학 Ⅰ" (1997), 나남출판

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)