기계복제에서 디지털복제로 : 발터 벤야민의‘기술복제’개념과 오늘의 양상
From Mechanical Reproduction to Digital Reproduction : The Concept of Walter Benjamin's Technical Reproduction and Today's Aspect
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to explain the concept of Walter Benjamin’s technical reproduction and to examine the today’s aspects caused by digital reproduction. Benjamin mention, in <The Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproduction>, the change of function of art caused by photographic reproduction. But, he does not concretely mention the nature of this reproduction. Therefore, I tried to determine the characteristic of the technical reproduction which cause this change. In the second edition of the article, Benjamin distinguish the second technic from the first technic. The one is similar to the machine that Marx mention in <The Capital>, the other is similar to the instrument. The nature of the machine consist to conquest limit of the work of the human being. Benjamin also mention of the nature of the second technic that minimize the participation of the human being. Finally, this second technic is a mechanical technic, the technical reproduction which cause the change of the art is the mechanical reproduction. By the way, today’s digital technology bring about change once more the nature and the way of reproduction. This new way of reproduction is better than the mechanical reproduction in respect of the quantity, the quality and the speed of reproduction. It also have encouraging elements in respect of the subject of the reproduction and the circulation of the image. We have to observe carefully the change that the digital reproduction will bring about.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the concept of Walter Benjamin’s technical reproduction and to examine the today’s aspects caused by digital reproduction. Benjamin mention, in <The Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproduction>, the change of function of art caused by photographic reproduction. But, he does not concretely mention the nature of this reproduction. Therefore, I tried to determine the characteristic of the technical reproduction which cause this change. In the second edition of the article, Benjamin distinguish the second technic from the first technic. The one is similar to the machine that Marx mention in <The Capital>, the other is similar to the instrument. The nature of the machine consist to conquest limit of the work of the human being. Benjamin also mention of the nature of the second technic that minimize the participation of the human being. Finally, this second technic is a mechanical technic, the technical reproduction which cause the change of the art is the mechanical reproduction. By the way, today’s digital technology bring about change once more the nature and the way of reproduction. This new way of reproduction is better than the mechanical reproduction in respect of the quantity, the quality and the speed of reproduction. It also have encouraging elements in respect of the subject of the reproduction and the circulation of the image. We have to observe carefully the change that the digital reproduction will bring about.
참고문헌 (23)
- 발터 벤야민, "기술복제 시대의예술작품, In 사진의 작은 역사, In 발터 벤야민 선집 2" (2007), 길
- 발터 벤야민, "기계복제 시대의예술작품, In 사유 속의 영화" (2011), 문학과 지성사
- 김청, "인쇄의 역사" (2005), 포장산업
- 강수미, "테크놀로지 사회에서의 예술의 조건: 발터 벤야민의 '기술(Technik)' 개념을 중심으로", 미학예술학연구, (22), pp.341~373 (2005), 한국미학예술학회
- 심혜련, "예술과 기술의 문제에 관하여: 벤야민과 하이데거의 논의를 중심으로", 시대와 철학, (34), pp.7~37 (2006), 한국철학사상연구회
- 최성만, "기술과 예술의 열린 변증법 - 발터 벤야민의 『기술복제시대의 예술작품』 읽기", 뷔히너와 현대문학, (32), pp.183~204 (2009), 한국뷔히너학회
- Walter Benjamin, "L’OEuvre d’art à l’époque de sa reproductiliité technique. in Walter Benjamin OEuvre II I" (2000), Folio essais
- Walter Benjamin, "L’OEuvre d’art à l’époque de sa reproductiliité mécanisée. in Ecrits français" (1991), Gallimard
- Walter Benjamin, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" (1969), Illuminations
- Catherine Perret, "Walter Benjamin : le problème de la dimension esthétique, in Revue d’esthétique - Walter Benjamin" (1990), Jean Michel Place
- Catherine Perret, "Walter Benjamin sans destin" (1992), La Différence
- Irving Wohlfarth, "Sur quelques motifs juifs chez Benjamin. in Revue d’esthétique - Walter Benjamin" (1990), Jean Michel Place
- Bruno Tackels, "L’OEuvre d’art à l’époque de W. Benjamin – Histoire d’aura" (1999), L’Harmattan
- Susan Buck-Morss, "The Dialectics of Seeing – Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project" (1991), MIT Press
- Richard Wolin, "Walter Benjamin – An Aesthetic of Redemption" (1994), University of California Press
- Maria Petersson, "Actualities of Aura – Twelve Studies of Walter Benjamin" (2005), Nordic Summer University Press
- Rainer Rochlitz, "Walter Benjamin – Critique pholosophique de l’art" (2005), PUF
- Patricia Lavelle, "Religion et histoire : sur le concept d’expérience chez Walter Benjamin" (2008), Cerf
- Rolf Tiedemann, "Etudes sur la philosophie de Walter Benjamin" (1999), Actes sud
- Jean Lacoste, "L’aura et la rupture – Walter Benjamin" (2003), Maurice Nadeau
- Karl Marx, "Le Capital" (1897), Flammarion
- Vilem Flusser, "Towards a Philosophy of Photography" (2000), Reaktion Books Ltd
- Michel Frizot, "Nouvelle histoire de la photography" (2001), Larousse