간접평판형 검출기에서 국제전자기술위원회 기준을 통한 잡음전력스펙트럼 비교 연구
Comparison of Noise Power Spectrum in Measurements by Using International Electro-technical Commission Standard Devices in Indirect Digital Radiography
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of indirect digital radiography (IDR) system using the International Electro-technical Commission standard (IEC 62220-1), and to suggest the analysis of noise power spectrum (NPS) which were applied to IEC 62220-1 in medical imaging. In this study, Pixium 4600 (Trixell, France) which is indirect flat panel detector (FPD) was used. The size of image receptor (IR) is 7 × 17 inch (matrix 3001 × 3001) which performed 14bit processing and pixel pitch is 143 μm. In IEC standard, NPS evaluation were applied to RQA3, RQA5, RQA7 and RQA9. Because of different radiation quality, each region of interesting (ROI) were compared. The results of NPS indicated up to 3.5 mm-1 including low Nyquist frequency. RQA5 indicated the lowest NPS and the others indicated higher NPS results relatively. NPS result of ROI a38 was higher than ROI a92 and this result indicated that there are more noise in left (cathode) than right (anode). This study were to evaluate NPS by using different radiation quality and setting the each ROI, and to suggest the quantitative methods of measuring NPS
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of indirect digital radiography (IDR) system using the International Electro-technical Commission standard (IEC 62220-1), and to suggest the analysis of noise power spectrum (NPS) which were applied to IEC 62220-1 in medical imaging. In this study, Pixium 4600 (Trixell, France) which is indirect flat panel detector (FPD) was used. The size of image receptor (IR) is 7 × 17 inch (matrix 3001 × 3001) which performed 14bit processing and pixel pitch is 143 μm. In IEC standard, NPS evaluation were applied to RQA3, RQA5, RQA7 and RQA9. Because of different radiation quality, each region of interesting (ROI) were compared. The results of NPS indicated up to 3.5 mm-1 including low Nyquist frequency. RQA5 indicated the lowest NPS and the others indicated higher NPS results relatively. NPS result of ROI a38 was higher than ROI a92 and this result indicated that there are more noise in left (cathode) than right (anode). This study were to evaluate NPS by using different radiation quality and setting the each ROI, and to suggest the quantitative methods of measuring NPS
참고문헌 (16)
- 정회원, "다양한 디지털 방사선 시스템의 물리적 영상 특성 조사", 방사선기술과학, 40(3), pp.363~370 (2017), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 정회원, "CsI(TI) Indirect Flat Panel Detector의 선질에 따른 물리적 영상 평가", 방사선기술과학, 35(2), pp.109~117 (2012), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Modulation Transfer Function of Screen-Film Systems, "International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements", ~, pp.Report No 41 (1986)
- 손순룡, "Measurement of Image Quality According to the Time of Computed Radiography System", 방사선기술과학, 38(4), pp.365~374 (2015), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 손순룡, "Evaluation of Image Quality for Various Electronic Portal Imaging Devices in Radiation Therapy", 방사선기술과학, 38(4), pp.451~461 (2015), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 김기원, "컴퓨터단층검사에서 AAPM Phantom을 이용한 변조전달함수 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(2), pp.193~198 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 김기원, "유방영상에서 엣지를 이용한 물리적 영상 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(3), pp.415~420 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Fujita H, "A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 11(1), pp.34~39 (1992)
- Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency, "IEC (International Electro-technical Commission)", ~ (2003)
- Antonuk LE, "Demonstration of megavoltage and diagnostic X-ray imaging with hydrogenated amorphous silicon arrays", Med. Phys, 19(6), pp.1455~1466 (1992)
- Granfors PR, "Performance of a 41×41cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications", Med. Phys, 27(6), pp.1324~1333 (2000)
- Finc C, "Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography", Am. J. Roentgenol, 178(2), pp.481~486 (2001)
- Bacher K, "Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography", Am. J. Roentgenol, 181(4), pp.923~929 (2003)
- Schaetzing R., "Computed radiography technology", Proceeding of Radiological Society of North America (2003)
- Dobbins JT, "DQE (f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices", Med. Phys, 22(10), pp.1581~1593 (1995)
- Dobbins III JT, "Inter comparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum", Medical Physics, 33, pp.1466~1475 (2006)