자동노출제어장치를 이용한 요추 측면 방사선검사 시 환자 중심 위치 변화가 선량과 화질에 미치는 영향
Effects of Dose and Image Quality according to Center Location in Lumbar Spine Lateral Radiography Using AEC Mode
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to consider usefulness of using AEC mode and importance of patient center location in L-spine lateral radiography by comparing dose and image quality according to the change of patient center location with using AEC mode or not. In this study, guide wire is attached to the human body phantom’s lumbar spine and the lead ruler is attached to the bottom of the wall detector to find out center location in detector. ESD, ㎃s, and EI were selected as dose factors, and image quality was compared through SNR. With the lumbar spine located center of the detector, dose factors and image quality were compared according to using AEC mode or not. Afterwards, phantom moved 4 ㎝ and 8 ㎝ back and forth and compared dose factors and image quality. The exposure parameters were 85 ㎸p, 320 ㎃, x-ray field size 10×17 inch, and the distance between the center X-ray and the detector was fixed at 100 ㎝. The center X-ray was perpendicular to the fourth lumbar spine and the only bottom AEC chamber was used. All data were analyzed by independent t-test and ANOVA. As a result of this study, with AEC when the center is matched, ESD was 1.31±0.01 m㏉, without AEC was 2.12±0.01 m㏉. SNR was shown to be 22.81±1.83, and 23.44±1.87 respectively. When the phantom’s center moves 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ forward, and 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ backward, ESD were 1.09±0.004 m㏉, 0.32±0.003 m㏉, 1.19±0.017 m㏉, 1.11±0.006 m㏉ respectively, SNR were 18.29±0.60 ㏈, 11.11±0.22 ㏈, 18.98±0.80 ㏈, 17.71±0.82 ㏈. Using AEC in L-spine lateral radiography reduced ESD by 38%, EI by 35%, and ㎃s by 38%, without any difference in SNR(p<0.05). When the phantom’s center moves 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ forward, and 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ backward, ESD was decreasing each 16%, 75%, 9%, 15%, EI was decreasing each 14%, 77%, 15%, 20%, mAs was decreasing each 15% 75% 9%, 15%. SNR was decreasing each 19%, 51%, 17%, 22%.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to consider usefulness of using AEC mode and importance of patient center location in L-spine lateral radiography by comparing dose and image quality according to the change of patient center location with using AEC mode or not. In this study, guide wire is attached to the human body phantom’s lumbar spine and the lead ruler is attached to the bottom of the wall detector to find out center location in detector. ESD, ㎃s, and EI were selected as dose factors, and image quality was compared through SNR. With the lumbar spine located center of the detector, dose factors and image quality were compared according to using AEC mode or not. Afterwards, phantom moved 4 ㎝ and 8 ㎝ back and forth and compared dose factors and image quality. The exposure parameters were 85 ㎸p, 320 ㎃, x-ray field size 10×17 inch, and the distance between the center X-ray and the detector was fixed at 100 ㎝. The center X-ray was perpendicular to the fourth lumbar spine and the only bottom AEC chamber was used. All data were analyzed by independent t-test and ANOVA. As a result of this study, with AEC when the center is matched, ESD was 1.31±0.01 m㏉, without AEC was 2.12±0.01 m㏉. SNR was shown to be 22.81±1.83, and 23.44±1.87 respectively. When the phantom’s center moves 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ forward, and 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ backward, ESD were 1.09±0.004 m㏉, 0.32±0.003 m㏉, 1.19±0.017 m㏉, 1.11±0.006 m㏉ respectively, SNR were 18.29±0.60 ㏈, 11.11±0.22 ㏈, 18.98±0.80 ㏈, 17.71±0.82 ㏈. Using AEC in L-spine lateral radiography reduced ESD by 38%, EI by 35%, and ㎃s by 38%, without any difference in SNR(p<0.05). When the phantom’s center moves 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ forward, and 4 ㎝, 8 ㎝ backward, ESD was decreasing each 16%, 75%, 9%, 15%, EI was decreasing each 14%, 77%, 15%, 20%, mAs was decreasing each 15% 75% 9%, 15%. SNR was decreasing each 19%, 51%, 17%, 22%.
참고문헌 (15)
- Andersson GBJ, "Epidemiology of low back pain", Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, (Sup281), pp.28~31 (1998)
- Ko HY, "Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. A Clinical Practice Guideline from Korean Association of Pain Medicine", 10(1), pp.1~37 (2011)
- Wang JH, "Guidelines for patient dose recommendation in abdominal, pelvic and lumbar radiology (Civil Guide)", Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 88~93 (2011)
- 김재겸, "유리선량계를 이용한 요추검사의 장기선량 및 영상의 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(1), pp.1~11 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- ICRP, "The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103", Ann. ICRP, 37(2-4) (2007)
- Ullman G, "The influence of patient thickness and imaging system on patient dose and physical image quality in digital chest imaging", Dosimetry, 114(1-3), pp.294~297 (2005)
- Kim KT, "A study of sensor for automatic exposure control system for minimization of dose creep", master’s, The Dept. of Health Science and Technology, pp.2015
- 권순무, "Digital Chest Radiography에서 방사선량에 대한Source to Image-Receptor Distance (SID)의 영향", 한국방사선학회논문지, 8(4), pp.203~210 (2014), 한국방사선학회[DOI]
- 김성경, "만성 요통 환자의 통증, 지식 및 교육 요구", 근관절건강학회지, 24(1), pp.56~65 (2017), 대한근관절건강학회[DOI]
- Jung EK, "Diagnostic reference level guidelines-General radiography", Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 27~45 (2019)
- 김유현, "진단방사선영역에서 방사선장치의 이용실태 및 환자피폭선량에 관한 조사연구", 의학물리, 16(1), pp.10~15 (2005), 한국의학물리학회
- 김기원, "복부 전후 방향 검사의 자동노출제어 사용 시 선량 비교 연구", 방사선기술과학, 38(3), pp.205~211 (2015), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 정지상, "자동노출제어를 사용한 X선 흉부촬영에서 AEC 표지자 사용에 따른 환자 피폭선량 감소 효과", 방사선기술과학, 37(3), pp.177~185 (2014), 대한방사선과학회
- Chung YH, "Usefulness of auto exposure control mode in digital flat-panel system for reduction of dose area product: Phantom study of the lumbar spine", European Society of Radiology (2011)
- Chung HB, "Analysis of AEC dose according to BMI and Body size in Abdomen X ray", master’s, pp.2017