본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

척추 방사선수술 시 다엽콜리메이터 위치 오차의 임상적 위험성 평가

Evaluation of Clinical Risk according to Multi-Leaf Collimator Positioning Error in Spinal Radiosurgery

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical risk of spinal radiosurgery by calculating the dose difference due to dose calculation algorithm and multi-leaf collimator positioning error. The images acquired by the CT simulator were recalculated by correcting the multi-leaf collimator position in the dose verification program created using MATLAB and applying stoichiometric calibration and Monte Carlo algorithm. With multi-leaf collimator positioning error, the clinical target volume (CTV) showed a dose difference of up to 13% in the dose delivered to the 95% volume, while the gross tumor volume (GTV) showed a dose difference of 9%. The average dose delivered to the total volume showed dose variation from –8.9% to 9% and –10.1% to 10.2% for GTV and CTV, respectively. The maximum dose delivered to the total volume of the spinal cord showed a dose difference from –14.2% to 19.6%, and the dose delivered to the 0.35 ㎤ volume showed a dose difference from –15.5% to 19.4%. In future research, automating the linkage between treatment planning systems and dose verification programs would be useful for spinal radiosurgery.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical risk of spinal radiosurgery by calculating the dose difference due to dose calculation algorithm and multi-leaf collimator positioning error. The images acquired by the CT simulator were recalculated by correcting the multi-leaf collimator position in the dose verification program created using MATLAB and applying stoichiometric calibration and Monte Carlo algorithm. With multi-leaf collimator positioning error, the clinical target volume (CTV) showed a dose difference of up to 13% in the dose delivered to the 95% volume, while the gross tumor volume (GTV) showed a dose difference of 9%. The average dose delivered to the total volume showed dose variation from –8.9% to 9% and –10.1% to 10.2% for GTV and CTV, respectively. The maximum dose delivered to the total volume of the spinal cord showed a dose difference from –14.2% to 19.6%, and the dose delivered to the 0.35 ㎤ volume showed a dose difference from –15.5% to 19.4%. In future research, automating the linkage between treatment planning systems and dose verification programs would be useful for spinal radiosurgery.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Schuster JM, "Medical management and adjuvant therapies in spinal metastatic disease", Neurosurg Focus, 11(6), pp.e3~ (2001)[DOI]
  2. Lee YK, "Comparison of deliverable IMRT and VMAT for spine metastases using a simultaneous integrated boost", Br J Radiol, 86(1022), pp.20120466~ (2013)[DOI]
  3. 장경환, "A Comparison of Patient-specific Delivery Quality Assurance (DQA) Devices in Radiation Therapy", 방사선기술과학, 46(3), pp.231~238 (2023), 대한방사선과학회
  4. Matsumura A, "Radiation therapy without surgery for spinal metastases : Clinical outcome and prognostic factors analysis for pain control", Global Spine J, 2(3), pp.137~142 (2012)[DOI]
  5. 엄기천, "두경부 IMRT 및 VMAT 시 체적 감소가 전산화치료계획에 미치는 영향", 방사선기술과학, 46(3), pp.239~246 (2023), 대한방사선과학회
  6. Wu QJ, "Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy : Comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 75(5), pp.1596~1604 (2009)[DOI]
  7. Jin JY, "Technical and clinical experience with spine radiosurgery : A new technology for management of localized spine metastases", Technol Cancer Res Treat, 6(2), pp.127~133 (2007)[DOI]
  8. Yin FF, "A technique of intensity-modulated rediosurgery(IMRS)for spinal tumors", Med Phys, 29(12), pp.2815~2822 (2002)[DOI]
  9. Ryu S, "Image-guided and intensity-modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis", Cancer, 97(8), pp.2013~2018 (2003)[DOI]
  10. Shiu AS, "Near simultaneous computed tomography image-guided stereotactic spinal radiotherapy : An emerging paradigm for achieving true stereotaxy", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57(3), pp.605~613 (2003)[DOI]
  11. 손세일, "The Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Metastasis to the Spine", 대한신경외과학회지, 51(1), pp.1~7 (2012), 대한신경외과학회[DOI]
  12. Dempsey JF, "A fourier analysis of the dose grid resolution required for accurate IMRT fluence map optimization", Med Phys, 32(2), pp.380~388 (2005)[DOI]
  13. Abbatucci JS, "Radiation myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord : Time, dose and volume factors", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 4(3-4), pp.239~248 (1978)[DOI]
  14. Gao J, "Off-isocenter winston-lutz test for stereotactic radiosurgery", stereotactic body radiotherapy, 2016, pp.5(2), 154~161
  15. Calvo-Ortega JF, "A closer look at the conventional Winston-Lutz test : Analysis in terms of dose", Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 24(5), pp.421~427 (2019)[DOI]
  16. Yin FF, "Image-guided procedures for intensitymodulated spinal radiosurgery. Technical note", J Neurosurg, 101(3), pp.419~424 (2004)[DOI]
  17. Solberg TD, "Dynamic arc radiosurgery field shaping : A comparison with static field conformal and noncoplanar circular arcs", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 49(5), pp.1481~1491 (2001)[DOI]
  18. Benedict SH, "Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic micro-multileaf collimation", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 50(3), pp.751~758 (2001)[DOI]
  19. Otto K, "Volumetric modulated arc therapy : IMRT in a single gantry arc", Med Phys, 35(1), pp.310~317 (2008)[DOI]
  20. Monk JE, "Comparison of a micro-multileaf collimator with a 5-mm-leaf-width collimator for intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57(5), pp.1443~1449 (2003)[DOI]
  21. Jin JY, "Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery", Med Phys, 32(2), pp.405~411 (2005)[DOI]
  22. Tanyi JA, "Implications of a high-definition multi-leaf collimator(HD-MLC)on treatment planning techniques for stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) : A planning study", Radiat Oncol, 10(4), pp.22~ (2009)[DOI]
  23. Lee BR, "Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator", J Appl Clin Med Phys, 20(10), pp.101~110 (2019)[DOI]
  24. Goma C, "Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning : A critical look at the stoichiometric method", Phys Med Biol, 63(23), pp.235011~ (2018)[DOI]
  25. Yohannes I, "A formulation of tissue-and water-equivalent materials using the stoichiometric analysis method for CT-number calibration in radiotherapy treatment planning", Phys Med Biol, 57(5), pp.1173~1190 (2012)[DOI]
  26. Schneider U, "The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning", Phys Med Biol, 41(1), pp.111~124 (1996)[DOI]
  27. 강동진, "자궁경부암 근접치료 시 선량 검증 프로그램을 통한 임상적 위험성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 45(6), pp.553~560 (2022), 대한방사선과학회
  28. Kang DJ, "Development of clinical application program for radiotherapy induced cancer risk calculation using Monte Carlo engine in volumetric-modulated arc therapy", Radiat Oncol, 16, pp.108~ (2021)[DOI]
  29. Zakjevskii VV, "Development and evaluation of an end-to-end test for head and neck IMRT with a novel multiple-dosimetric modality phantom", J Appl Clin Med Phys, 17(2), pp.497~510 (2016)[DOI]
  30. Narayanasamy G, "A dose falloff gradient study in rapidarc planning of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy", J Med Phys, 43(3), pp.147~154 (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)