상장회사의 자기자본질서의 변화와 법적 과제 - 개정 상법과 자본시장법 개정안상 몇 가지 쟁점을 중심으로 -
Changes in the Listed Company’s Own Equity Capital Environment and Legal Problems - Focusing on Some Issues under the Amended Commercial Code and Revising Draft of the Capital Market Act -
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 2012 amended Commercial Code, in which the largest volume of issues has been epochally revised in the fields of the corporate governance, finance and fundamental changes etc, in the Korean legislative history could substantially change the company's own equity capital environment especially by issuing the no-par value share and classes of shares and also by the purchase and disposal regimes of company’s own shares. Moreover, in the revising draft of the ‘Capital Market Act’ pre-announced in May, 2012, the contingent capital instrument and the share purchase warrant certificates as new capital raising mechanisms in the listed companies, which also would bring direct changes to the company’s capital structure as in a newly designed share issuing structure, are expected to be introduced in the near future. Nevertheless, a variety of interpretative opinions in relation to some legal issues are remarkably divided in the academic world because of the legislative fallacy, inadequacy or ambiguity of the above provisions under the revised commercial code. And also there are some problems to be reviewed more elaborately on the concerned issuing affairs of contingent capital instrument as well as those of the share purchase warrant certificates in the revising draft. In this paper, reasonable interpretations on the legal effects of the no-par value shares on the reduction of authorized capital, cancellation of the shares and share dividend, and classes of shares as well as the purchase and disposal of company's own shares are suggested on the basis of the legislative intents and reviews of the related pros and cons. And also, legislative recommendations are given in relation to some clauses to be renewed or to be supplemented in introducing the contingent capital instrument and the share purchase warrant certificates under the revising draft. In conclusion, it is stressed that conflicts of interests between shareholders and stakeholders, which would lie potentially behind the implementation of the new capital raising mechanism in the shareholding companies, should be properly balanced and controlled under both of the Commercial Code and Capital Market Act.
Abstract
The 2012 amended Commercial Code, in which the largest volume of issues has been epochally revised in the fields of the corporate governance, finance and fundamental changes etc, in the Korean legislative history could substantially change the company's own equity capital environment especially by issuing the no-par value share and classes of shares and also by the purchase and disposal regimes of company’s own shares. Moreover, in the revising draft of the ‘Capital Market Act’ pre-announced in May, 2012, the contingent capital instrument and the share purchase warrant certificates as new capital raising mechanisms in the listed companies, which also would bring direct changes to the company’s capital structure as in a newly designed share issuing structure, are expected to be introduced in the near future. Nevertheless, a variety of interpretative opinions in relation to some legal issues are remarkably divided in the academic world because of the legislative fallacy, inadequacy or ambiguity of the above provisions under the revised commercial code. And also there are some problems to be reviewed more elaborately on the concerned issuing affairs of contingent capital instrument as well as those of the share purchase warrant certificates in the revising draft. In this paper, reasonable interpretations on the legal effects of the no-par value shares on the reduction of authorized capital, cancellation of the shares and share dividend, and classes of shares as well as the purchase and disposal of company's own shares are suggested on the basis of the legislative intents and reviews of the related pros and cons. And also, legislative recommendations are given in relation to some clauses to be renewed or to be supplemented in introducing the contingent capital instrument and the share purchase warrant certificates under the revising draft. In conclusion, it is stressed that conflicts of interests between shareholders and stakeholders, which would lie potentially behind the implementation of the new capital raising mechanism in the shareholding companies, should be properly balanced and controlled under both of the Commercial Code and Capital Market Act.
참고문헌 (40)
- 권재열, "개정상법상 주식관련제도의 개선내용과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (56), pp.1~30 (2011), 법무부
- 김건식, "자본시장법 2판" (2010), 두성사
- 김순석, "워런트(warrant) 제도에 관한 검토", 2010년도 한국기업법학회·한국상사판례학회 하계공동학술대회(개정상법의 현황과 입법상의 과제 (2010)
- 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 박준, "기업금융활성화와 신종증권에 관한 자본시장법의 개정", 상사판례연구, 24(3), pp.29~93 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
- 박철영, "종류주식의 활용과 법적 과제-의결제한주식을 중심으로, 개정 상법상 기업구조재편제도의 활용과 법적 과제", 한국기업법학회, 2011, ~
- 법무부, "상법 회사편 해설", ~ (2012)
- 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요 쟁점", 서울지방변호사회, 2011, ~[DOI]
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 송종준, "주식회사 법정자본제도의 국제적 개혁동향과 입법 과제 － 주주와 채권자의 이해조정을 중심으로 －", 경영법률, 20(1), pp.171~204 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 송종준, "자기주식의 처분절차 규제에 관한 소고", 법률신문 제3504호, ~ (2006)
- 송종준, "조건부 자본증권의 도입에 관한 소고 - 자본시장법 개정안을 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 25(3), pp.229~251 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 송종준, "상법상 워런트 도입을 위한 입법 모델 연구 －Equity Warrant를 중심으로－", 증권법연구, 11(3), pp.1~52 (2010), 한국증권법학회
- 송종준, "한국형 포이즌 필의 법리 해석과 몇 가지 입법과제 －2010년 상법일부개정법률안상 신주인수선택권을 중심으로－", 증권법연구, 11(1), pp.255~303 (2010), 한국증권법학회
- 신우진, "경영권 방어를 위한 자기주식의 제3자에 대한 처분의 법적 문제점", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.139~176 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 심영, "상법상 종류주식에 대한 고찰", 건국대 법학연구소 학술대회 (2012)
- 안상현, "개정상법상 무액면주식의 도입", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대 금융법센터
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 안수현, "Hybrid Equity Finance 법제의 평가와 과제", 2102년 한국경영법률학회춘계학술대회 (2012)
- 이철송, "2011 개정상법-축조해설" (2012), 박영사
- 이철송, "2011 개정상법의 정책적 및 기술적 오류", 6월 특별세미나 (2012), 한국증권법학회
- 이철송, "불공정한 자기주식거래의 효력 - 주식평등의 원칙과 관련하여", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.1~25 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 장정모, "조건부자본의 역할에 대한 전망", 자본시장 Weekly, (32) (2011), 자본시장연구원
- 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2012), 법문사
- 정동윤, "보통주와 종류주의 개념에 관하여-개정상법의 해석과 관련하여-", 상사법연구, 31(1), pp.37~53 (2012), 한국상사법학회[DOI]
- 정수용, "개정상법상 종류주식의 다양화", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대 금융법센터
- 정순섭, "금융회사의 자본규제-조건부 자본의 상법상 문제", 한국상사법학회 2010년 추계학술대회 발표자료 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 조재두, "거래소 상장·공시규정 개정에 따른 상장법인의 대응방안", 상장회사감사회, (149) (2012), 한국상장회사협의회
- 최준선, "2011 개정 상법 회사편 해설", 한국상장회사협의회, ~ (2011)
- 금융위원회, "우리나라 금융의 미래를 위한 자본시장법 개정 추진방안(보도자료별첨 자료)", ~ (2011)
- 금융위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 개정안 입법예고", 보도자료, ~
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2008), 有斐閣
- 江頭憲治郞, "新株豫約權·種類株式をめぐる實務對應(上)", pp.1628~ (2002), 商事法務
- 山下友信, (2009), 商事法務
- Alain Couret, "Alain Couret" (2008), Dalloz
- "Basel Ⅲ : A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems" (2010)[URL]
- Chris Bates, "Contingent Capital-The New Hybrid Capital?", Ninth Annual Institute on Securities Regulation in Europe : A Contrast in EU & U.S. Provisions, 669~ (2010)
- "Is Warrant really a derivative? Evidence from the Chinese Warrant market"[URL]
- William J. Carney, "Corporate Finance-Principles and Practice" (2005), West