무액면주식의 활성화를 위한 법적 문제점과그 해결방안
Legal Issues Related to No Par Value Stock and Measures to Promote its Use
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea introduced the no par value stock with the amendment of theCommercial Act in 2011. The system allows a company to flexibly determinethe par value of its stocks for the stock issue even if the stock prices inthe market are low, and thus supports the mobility and convenience forequity capital financing. No par value stocks give companies more flexibilityin setting higher prices for future public offerings than par value stocks. Topromote this benefit, the number of no par value stocks outstanding shouldincrease and relevant regulations should meet the demands of the field. Since companies that have par value stocks issued are not allowed toissue no par value stocks, existing companies that had issued par valuestocks before the amendment of the Commercial Act cannot issue no parvalue stocks unless they convert all of the existing par value stocks to nopar value stocks. Even for new companies who choose to issue no parvalue stocks will soon face the dilemma that no par value stocks and parvalue stocks cannot exist at the same time. No par value stocks make stocksplits and the adjustment of merger ratio in terms of shares easy,contributing to the promotion of M&As. In addition, companies can increasethe number of outstanding shares and expand their marketability, which willeventually serve as an effective incentive for the equity capital raising. This study examined ways to maximize the benefits offered by the no parvalue stock system that has been introduced in Korea while minimizing itsshortcomings. In addition, it explored related legal issues and solutions toput in place and promote this system in Korea.
Abstract
Korea introduced the no par value stock with the amendment of theCommercial Act in 2011. The system allows a company to flexibly determinethe par value of its stocks for the stock issue even if the stock prices inthe market are low, and thus supports the mobility and convenience forequity capital financing. No par value stocks give companies more flexibilityin setting higher prices for future public offerings than par value stocks. Topromote this benefit, the number of no par value stocks outstanding shouldincrease and relevant regulations should meet the demands of the field. Since companies that have par value stocks issued are not allowed toissue no par value stocks, existing companies that had issued par valuestocks before the amendment of the Commercial Act cannot issue no parvalue stocks unless they convert all of the existing par value stocks to nopar value stocks. Even for new companies who choose to issue no parvalue stocks will soon face the dilemma that no par value stocks and parvalue stocks cannot exist at the same time. No par value stocks make stocksplits and the adjustment of merger ratio in terms of shares easy,contributing to the promotion of M&As. In addition, companies can increasethe number of outstanding shares and expand their marketability, which willeventually serve as an effective incentive for the equity capital raising. This study examined ways to maximize the benefits offered by the no parvalue stock system that has been introduced in Korea while minimizing itsshortcomings. In addition, it explored related legal issues and solutions toput in place and promote this system in Korea.
참고문헌 (34)
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2012), 홍문사
- 임재연, "회사법Ⅰ" (2012), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 이철송, "2011개정상법 축조해석" (2011), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
- 최준선, "2011 개정상법 회사편 해설" (2011), 한국상장회사협의회
- 한국상사법학회, "주식회사법대계Ⅰ" (2013), 법문사
- 송종준, "상장회사의 자기자본질서의 변화와 법적 과제 - 개정 상법과 자본시장법 개정안상 몇 가지 쟁점을 중심으로 -", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.143~179 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 정쾌영, "무액면주식제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 14(2) (2001), 한국산업경제학회
- 송옥렬, "자본제도의 개정방향 : 2008년 상법개정안을 중심으로", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.257~292 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요쟁점 - 기업재무 분야를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (127), pp.45~79 (2011), 한국법학원
- 송옥렬, "개정상법상 자기주식취득과 주식소각", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 안상현, "개정상법상 무액면주식의 도입", BFL, (51) (2012), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 장지석, "무액면주식에서의 발행가액과 자본구성", 상사법연구, 19(1) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- 최병규, "개정 상법상 무액면주식제도에 관한 연구", 경영법률, 21(4), pp.321~360 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
- 나승성, "改正商法상의 無額面株式制度에 관한 法的 檢討", 기업법연구, 25(3), pp.75~94 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 崔完鎭, "無額面株式制度에 관한 法的 考察", 외법논집, (29), pp.281~303 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김영곤, "무액면주식제도의 도입에 따른 검토", 법학연구, (27), pp.125~143 (2007), 한국법학회
- 김순석, "무액면주식 제도 도입에 따른 법적 쟁점", 저스티스, (127), pp.171~203 (2011), 한국법학원
- 김희준, "무액면주식제도 도입에 따른 주식제도의 개선방향", 금융법연구, 10(1), pp.489~516 (2013), 한국금융법학회
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 김지환, "상법상 무액면주식제도에 관한 법적 쟁점 검토", 법학연구, 23(2), pp.135~165 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 양기진, "무액면주식의 도입 관련 회사법상 쟁점 연구", 일감법학, (22), pp.139~177 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 양동석, "무액면주식제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 15 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 江頭憲治郎, "株式会社法" (2006), 有斐閣
- ロバート, "アメリカ会社法" (2003), 木鐸社
- 小林量, "無額面株式制度に関する一考察(一)", 民商法雑誌, 89(1) (1983)
- 志村治美, "日·韓会社法における資金調達手段としての無額面株式·割引発行", 京都学院法学, (2·3) (1999)
- 小林量, "資本制度と額面株式制度の変容", 商事法務, (1398) (1995)
- 宇佐美雅彦, "額面株式の廃止と株式分割·併合制度の改正", 商事法務, (1641) (2002)
- 舛田精一, "なぜ無額面株式を利用しないか", 産業経理, 42(1) (1982)
- 神田秀樹, "資本市場からみた会社法", 商事法務, (1398) (1995)