본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개정상법상 자기주식의 취득과 처분

On Reacquired Stock under the Revised Korean Commercial Code of 2011

0

조회

0

다운로드

37

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article reviews legal issues related to stock repurchase and cancellation of shares under the 2011 revision of the Korean Commercial Code (KCC). A reacquired stock is one that is bought back by the issuing company. Companies repurchase their own stock for various reasons. Sometimes companies do this when they decide that their stock is undervalued in the open market. Another important purpose of repurchase is to provide a “bonus” according to an incentive compensation plan for employees. Others use stock repurchase to protect their company against a takeover threat. The Korean Commercial Code, before the revision in 2011, has strictly restricted the companies' repurchasing their own stock. However, the 2011 revision of KCC permitted companies to repurchase their own stock with their distributable profits. Thereafter, the Companies can either cancel the purchased shares or hold the shares for later resale. If not canceled, such shares are referred to as treasury shares. The revision intended not only to enhance the flexibility of equity financing, but also to harmonize treasury stock policy with that of other jurisdiction. For example, in the United States, buybacks are allowed and covered by multiple laws under the auspices of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also, in the UK, the Companies Act of 1955 companies from holding their own shares. However, the Companies Act of 1993 later repealed this. Further, stocks can be reacquired even when companies have no dividable profits, if they are repurchased when exercising the appraisal rights of dissenters in a case of M&A, takeover, split of corporation etc. This is termed reacquisition of stocks for specific purposes. On the other hand, companies are able to dispose the treasury stock at any time by the action of the board of directors. There are no restrictions on disposing the treasury stocks on the time or on the sale to a third party under the revised KCC. On the contrary, §165-5 paragraph 4 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act provides that the companies that reacquired stocks in the course of exercising the appraisal rights of dissenters shall dispose said stocks within three years from reacquiring. This writer suggests to repeal §165-5 paragraph 4 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act, so as to allow the companies to hold treasury stocks without a limit on time or other obligations.

Abstract

This article reviews legal issues related to stock repurchase and cancellation of shares under the 2011 revision of the Korean Commercial Code (KCC). A reacquired stock is one that is bought back by the issuing company. Companies repurchase their own stock for various reasons. Sometimes companies do this when they decide that their stock is undervalued in the open market. Another important purpose of repurchase is to provide a “bonus” according to an incentive compensation plan for employees. Others use stock repurchase to protect their company against a takeover threat. The Korean Commercial Code, before the revision in 2011, has strictly restricted the companies' repurchasing their own stock. However, the 2011 revision of KCC permitted companies to repurchase their own stock with their distributable profits. Thereafter, the Companies can either cancel the purchased shares or hold the shares for later resale. If not canceled, such shares are referred to as treasury shares. The revision intended not only to enhance the flexibility of equity financing, but also to harmonize treasury stock policy with that of other jurisdiction. For example, in the United States, buybacks are allowed and covered by multiple laws under the auspices of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also, in the UK, the Companies Act of 1955 companies from holding their own shares. However, the Companies Act of 1993 later repealed this. Further, stocks can be reacquired even when companies have no dividable profits, if they are repurchased when exercising the appraisal rights of dissenters in a case of M&A, takeover, split of corporation etc. This is termed reacquisition of stocks for specific purposes. On the other hand, companies are able to dispose the treasury stock at any time by the action of the board of directors. There are no restrictions on disposing the treasury stocks on the time or on the sale to a third party under the revised KCC. On the contrary, §165-5 paragraph 4 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act provides that the companies that reacquired stocks in the course of exercising the appraisal rights of dissenters shall dispose said stocks within three years from reacquiring. This writer suggests to repeal §165-5 paragraph 4 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act, so as to allow the companies to hold treasury stocks without a limit on time or other obligations.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 고인배, "자기주식 취득을 위한 제3자에 대한 자금지원- 대법원 2011. 4. 28. 선고 2009다23610호 판결 -", 동아법학, (53), pp.519~549 (2011), 법학연구소
  2. 김건식, "21세기 회사법 개정의 논리: 2006 법무부 상법개정작업 초실무자료기업재무편", ~ (2006)
  3. 김병연, "자기주식의 처분 및 활용방안" (2005), 한국상장회사협의회
  4. 김순석, "상법개정안상 자기주식 및 주식소각 제도의 검토", 일감법학, (18), pp.135~190 (2010), 법학연구소
  5. 김순석, "미국의 배당규제와 자기주식 제도", 비교사법, 13(2), pp.251~283 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
  6. 김해운, "자기주식취득규제 및 완화", 석사, 법학과, pp.2009
  7. 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
  8. 박종렬, "자기주식취득에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (10) (2002), 한국법학회
  9. 법무부, "상법 회사편 해설", ~ (2012)
  10. 송옥렬, "개정상법상 자기주식취득과 주식소각", BFL, (51) (2012)
  11. 송종준, "상장회사의 자기자본질서의 변화와 법적 과제", 한국상사법학회 2012년하계학술대회 자료집 (2012)
  12. 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
  13. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  14. 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2012)
  15. 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
  16. 주식회사 자본제도 개선방안 연구, "최준선", 한국상장협의회, ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)