자기주식의 처분과 경영권 방어
The Disposal of Treasury Stock & Defense of Management Right
0
조회
0
다운로드
22
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It has been prevalent for a business corporation established by the Korean law to re-purchase her own stocks for defense purpose. There has been wide range of discussions on whether these re-purchases are legal-theoretically flawless. The Commercial Code of Korea experienced in the year of 2011 a wide range of revision regarding the "company law" part (Part II). In especially the legal scheme on the treasury stock has changed deeply. From the year 2011 on, a korean company, listed or non-listed, is permitted to call her own stocks for treasury. According to the section 342 Korean Commercial Code, the board of directors is to be powered to dispose company's own stocks without any further regulation. In the meantime, the foreign nations like Japan, United Kingdom and Germany, have commonly the same written statutes on the disposal of treasury stocks. They impose a strictly regulated procedure from capital raising law. The japanese company law 2006 demands a procedural requirement like in the capital raising for consideration. The U.K. company law 2006 and the German Stock Corporation Act also follow this path. A unique exception from this trend could be found in the U.S., where the most state laws permit the company a wide range of freedom on acquisition and disposal of treasury stocks. The author recommends a reconsideration on the new section 342 of Korean Commercial Code.
Abstract
It has been prevalent for a business corporation established by the Korean law to re-purchase her own stocks for defense purpose. There has been wide range of discussions on whether these re-purchases are legal-theoretically flawless. The Commercial Code of Korea experienced in the year of 2011 a wide range of revision regarding the "company law" part (Part II). In especially the legal scheme on the treasury stock has changed deeply. From the year 2011 on, a korean company, listed or non-listed, is permitted to call her own stocks for treasury. According to the section 342 Korean Commercial Code, the board of directors is to be powered to dispose company's own stocks without any further regulation. In the meantime, the foreign nations like Japan, United Kingdom and Germany, have commonly the same written statutes on the disposal of treasury stocks. They impose a strictly regulated procedure from capital raising law. The japanese company law 2006 demands a procedural requirement like in the capital raising for consideration. The U.K. company law 2006 and the German Stock Corporation Act also follow this path. A unique exception from this trend could be found in the U.S., where the most state laws permit the company a wide range of freedom on acquisition and disposal of treasury stocks. The author recommends a reconsideration on the new section 342 of Korean Commercial Code.
참고문헌 (24)
- 권재열, "개정상법상 주식관련제도의 개선내용과 향후과제", 선진상사법률연구, (56), pp.1~30 (2011), 법무부
- 김용대, "자기주식의 처분과 신주발행절차의 유추 적용 여부 - 서울북부지방법원 2007. 10. 25. 자 2007 카합 1082 결정 (의결권행사금지가처분) -", 기업소송연구, pp.276~340 (2009)
- 문일봉, "자기주식처분과 관련된 가처분 – 수원지방법원 성남지원 2007. 1. 30 자 2007 카합 30 결정을 중심으로", BFL, (23), pp.89~100 (2007)
- 송옥렬, "개정 상법상 자기주식취득과 주식소각”, <특집 개정 상법의 해석상 쟁점>", BFL, (51), pp.115~123 (2012)
- 신우진, "경영권 방어를 위한 자기주식의 제 3 자에 대한 처분의 법적 문제점", 기업법연구, 21(1)통권 : 28, pp.130~176
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 李東承, "株主의 新株引受權에 관한 硏究 : 그 배제요건을 중심으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.1998
- 이철송, "불공정한 자기주식거래의 효력 - 주식평등의 원칙과 관련하여", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.1~25 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 임재연, "회사법 I" (2012), 박영사
- 정수용, "주식회사법대계 ( I )", pp.990~1037 (2013), 한국상사법학회
- 최준선, "개정상법상 자기주식의 취득과 처분", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.219~241 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 황남석, "상법상 배당가능이익에 의한 자기주식 취득의 쟁점", 상사법연구, 31(3), pp.59~109 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 허익준, "재무제표는 경제상식이다 (모든 것 시리즈 45)" (2002), 청림출판
- (2008), 靑林書院
- 尾崎哲夫, "條文ガイド六法, 會社法" (2012), 自由國民社
- 有田賢臣, "自己株式の實務處理 - 法務·會計·稅務の急所と對策" (2013), 中央經濟社
- 稅理士法人, "金庫株の稅·會計·法律の實務", pp.15~17 (2006), 中央經濟社
- Girvin, "Charlesworth's Company Law" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
- Gower, "Principles of Modern Company Law" (2012), Sweet & Maxwell
- Hannigan, "Company Law" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Kraakman (Reinier), "The Anatomy of Corporate Law" (2009), Oxford Univ. Press
- Mason, "Company Law" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Scanlan, "Companies Act 2006, A Guide to the New Law" (2007), The Law Society