현행 「상법」상 자기주식의 취득⋅처분 및 소각에 관한 소고
A study on the Acquisition⋅Disposition and Cancellation of Company’s Own Shares under the Current 「Commercial Code」
3
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Treasury stock of the 「Commercial Code」 is issued by the company and transferred in company from shareholders again. The acquisition, disposition and cancellation of these treasury shares can be important financial management strategies in the company’s operating. But abuse of treasury shares may cause problems from company management and transaction safety. Therefore countries around the world is based on the provisions of regulations and security. The former 「Commercial Code」 of revision in Korea has allowed the acquisition of treasury shares exceptionally if necessary, but prohibited in principle. However the 「Capital Market Code」 was allowed to acquire the acquisition of treasury shares in principle, if compliance of the scope of the available profit for dividends. But many scholars have been argued that there is no legitimate reason for the dualistic discrimination handling of the 「Commercial Code」 and the 「Capital Market Code」 and raised steadily the necessity of revising of obtaining regulatory provisions. As a result, 「Commercial Code」 was revised in 2011 and it has reduced unnecessary regulations for company’s operations and resolved legally the regulatory problems of discrimination according to whether listed or not. But the current 「Commercial Code」 also involves a certain part of the problem such as misuse or the risk of market disruption of treasury stock. Therefore, I would like to seek to desirable improvement about them in this paper.
Abstract
Treasury stock of the 「Commercial Code」 is issued by the company and transferred in company from shareholders again. The acquisition, disposition and cancellation of these treasury shares can be important financial management strategies in the company’s operating. But abuse of treasury shares may cause problems from company management and transaction safety. Therefore countries around the world is based on the provisions of regulations and security. The former 「Commercial Code」 of revision in Korea has allowed the acquisition of treasury shares exceptionally if necessary, but prohibited in principle. However the 「Capital Market Code」 was allowed to acquire the acquisition of treasury shares in principle, if compliance of the scope of the available profit for dividends. But many scholars have been argued that there is no legitimate reason for the dualistic discrimination handling of the 「Commercial Code」 and the 「Capital Market Code」 and raised steadily the necessity of revising of obtaining regulatory provisions. As a result, 「Commercial Code」 was revised in 2011 and it has reduced unnecessary regulations for company’s operations and resolved legally the regulatory problems of discrimination according to whether listed or not. But the current 「Commercial Code」 also involves a certain part of the problem such as misuse or the risk of market disruption of treasury stock. Therefore, I would like to seek to desirable improvement about them in this paper.
참고문헌 (50)
- 임재호, "제4전정 상법강의(상)" (2011), 형설출판사
- 권기범, "제4판 현대회사법론" (2012), 삼영사
- 김동훈, "회사법" (2010), 한국외국어대학교출판부
- 자기주식의 처분 및 활용방안, "김병연", 한국상장협의회, ~ (2005)
- 김정수, "현대증권법원론" (2002), 박영사
- 김정호, "회사법 제2판" (2012), 박문사
- 손주찬, "상법(상) 제15보정판" (2005), 박영사
- 송옥렬, "상법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 이기수, "회사법" (2009), 박영사
- 이범찬, "상법(상) 제6판" (2009), 삼영사
- 이철송, "상법강의(제13판)" (2012), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 정동윤, "상법(상) 제6판" (2012), 박문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론 제14대정판" (2012), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
- 회사법 개정방향에 관한 연구, "최준선", 한국상장협의회, ~ (2004)
- 장근영, "자본시장법 주석서" (2009), 박영사
- 고인배, "자기주식 취득을 위한 제3자에 대한 자금지원- 대법원 2011. 4. 28. 선고 2009다23610호 판결 -", 동아법학, (53), pp.519~549 (2011), 법학연구소
- 김순석, "미국의 배당규제와 자기주식 제도", 비교사법, 13(2), pp.251~283 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 김순석, "상법개정안상 자기주식 및 주식소각 제도의 검토", 일감법학, (18), pp.135~190 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김원기, "자기주식취득규제의 완화론에 대한 일고찰", 기업법연구, 1통권 : 1 (1994), 한국기업법학회
- 김홍기, "2011년 개정상법 및 동법시행령상 회사재무분야의 주요쟁점과 해석 및 운용상의 과제", 기업법연구, 26(1), pp.107~146 (2012), 한국기업법학회
- 김희준, "개정상법 회계 관련 규정과 한국채택국제회계기준규정의 비교 연구", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.579~611 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 도제문, "自己株式 取得規制에 관한 主要國의 제도와 시사점", 경영법률, 17(1), pp.129~163 (2006), 한국경영법률학회
- 송호신, "자기주식취득의 규제", 한양법학, 16 (2004), 한양법학회
- 신우진, "경영권 방어를 위한 자기주식의 제3자에 대한 처분의 법적 문제점", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.139~176 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 심영, "우리나라 회사회계제도의 현황과 발전방향", 상사법연구, 28(3), pp.349~376 (2009), 한국상사법학회
- 안성포, "자기주식취득의 허용에 따른 법적 쟁점", 상사법연구, 30(2), pp.73~104 (2011), 한국상사법학회
- 유영중, "자사주매입의 효과에 관한 연구", 한국전통상학연구, 17 (2000), 한국전통상학회
- 이철송, "불공정한 자기주식거래의 효력 - 주식평등의 원칙과 관련하여", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.1~25 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 정준우, "證券去來法上의 商法特例規定에 관한 批判的 檢討", 기업법연구, 21(2), pp.127~172 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 정준우, "2011년 개정상법상 자기주식의 취득ㆍ처분과 그 규제", 한양법학, 23(2), pp.241~271 (2012), 한양법학회[DOI]
- 상법상 배당가능이익산정에 관한 연구, "최병성", 한국상장협의회, ~, pp.한국상장회사협의회 연구자료 (2002)
- 최준선, "개정상법상 자기주식의 취득과 처분", 상사법연구, 31(2), pp.219~241 (2012), 한국상사법학회
- 상법일부개정법률안 심사보고서, 개정상법(회사법) 해설서, "국회법제사법위원회", 법무부, ~ (2012)
- 송종준, "자기주식의 처분절차규제에 관한 소고", 법률신문, (3504) (2006), 법률신문사
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法 第3版" (2009), 有斐閣
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社⋅有限會社法 第4版" (2005), 有斐閣
- 森本滋, "序論-わが國會社法の資本制度關聯改正の動向", 商事法務, (1601) (2001)
- 神田秀樹, "會社法 第5版" (2004), 弘文堂
- 川北英隆, "自己株式取得とその効果", 商事法務, (1399) (1995)
- Eilis Ferran, "Principles of Corporate Finance Law", ~ (2008)
- Gilson, "A Structural Approach to Corporations : A Case against Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers", Stanford L. Rev, 33 (1981)
- Grullon, Gustavo, "What Do We Know about Share Repurchases?", Journal of Applied Corporate Finance (2000)
- James D. Cox, "Corporations" (2003)
- Jeffrey N. Gordon, "Takeover Defense : A Comment on Two Models", Yale L. J, 96 (1986)
- Luca Enriques, "Creditors versus Capital Formation : The Case against the European Legal Capital Rules", Cornell L. Rev., 86, pp.1165~ (2001)
- Michael C. Wyatt, "Company Acquisition of Own Shares" (1989), Longman
- William L. Cary, "Corporations" (1995), The Foundations Press, Inc.