고전텍스트의 DNA를 묻는다: 고전텍스트의 문헌전승 계통도 분석에서 계통발생 분석방법(phylogenetical analysis)의 적용과 모색
DNA Profiling for Classical Texts: Issues and Prospects for the Phylogenetic Analysis in Textual Criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For the last few decades the method of computational phylogenetic analysis has been successfully adopted in numerous cases of text-critical works. It has opened a new possibility of textual criticism based on the possibility of dealing with a number on taxa with long lists of characters. But it seems that the method introduced to the field not only new technical possibilities but also a new perspective of textual stemmatics. To make this point clear an attempt is made in the present article to differentiate clearly the phylogenetic analysis (in Hennigian sense) from the computational cladistics. The major point is that the former method accepts the presupposed evolutionary process not only in the formal sense but also in the historical one. Overall, the different methodological possibilities offered by the computational phologenetic analysis and cladistics have, in my view, their own advantages depending on the general situation of the textual transmission of the target texts. Furthermore, indifferentiated application of the traditional philological method would not be valid, if it is adopted without any reference to a concrete history of text transmission(s). I have additionally attempted to make some suggestions for the future text-critical works with regard to the orally transmitted literature of Korea.
Abstract
For the last few decades the method of computational phylogenetic analysis has been successfully adopted in numerous cases of text-critical works. It has opened a new possibility of textual criticism based on the possibility of dealing with a number on taxa with long lists of characters. But it seems that the method introduced to the field not only new technical possibilities but also a new perspective of textual stemmatics. To make this point clear an attempt is made in the present article to differentiate clearly the phylogenetic analysis (in Hennigian sense) from the computational cladistics. The major point is that the former method accepts the presupposed evolutionary process not only in the formal sense but also in the historical one. Overall, the different methodological possibilities offered by the computational phologenetic analysis and cladistics have, in my view, their own advantages depending on the general situation of the textual transmission of the target texts. Furthermore, indifferentiated application of the traditional philological method would not be valid, if it is adopted without any reference to a concrete history of text transmission(s). I have additionally attempted to make some suggestions for the future text-critical works with regard to the orally transmitted literature of Korea.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강성용, "빠니니 읽기 인도 문법전통의 이해" (2011), 한길사
- Barbrook, A. C., "The Phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales", Nature, 394, pp.839~ (1998)
- Bechly, Günter, "Mainstream Cladistics versus Hennigian Phylogenetic Systematics", Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie), 613 (2000)
- Bédier, Joseph, "La tradition manuscrite du Lai de l’Ombre. Réflexions sur l’art d’éditer les anciens textes", Romania, 54, pp.161~196 (1928)
- Bordalejo, Barbara., "The Phylogeny of the Order in the Canterbury Tales", 박사, pp.2003
- Driscoll, Matthew J., "The Words on the Page: Thoughts on Philology, Old and New, In Creating the Medieval Saga: Versions, Variability and Editorial Interpretations of Old Norse Saga Literatur", pp.87~104 (2010), University Press of Southern Denmark
- Freehafer, John, "Greg’s Theory of Copy-Text and the Textual Criticism in the CEAA Editions", Studies in the Novel, 7(3), pp.375~388 (1975)
- Geib, Ruprecht, "Zur Frage nach der Urfassung des Pañcatantra, Freiburger Beiträge zur Indologie 2" (1969), Otto Harrassowitz
- Green, A. C, "The Difference Between McKerrow and Greg", Textual Cultures, 4(2), pp.31~53 (2009)
- Greg, Walter W., "The Rationale of Copy-Text", Studies in Bibliography, (3.), pp.19~36 (1950)
- Hall, Barry G, "Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy : A How To Manual, third edition" (2008), Sinauer Associates
- Hull, David L., "The Limits of Cladism", Systematic Zoology, 28(4), pp.416~440 (1979)
- Hennig, Willi, "Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik" (1950), Deutscher Zentralverlag
- Jordana, J, "Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Behavioral Characters in the Domestic Dog and Their Importance in the Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Relationships in Canids", Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22(1), pp.49~57 (1999)
- Katre, S. M., "Introduction to Indian Textual Criticism" (1954), Decccan College
- Maas, Paul, "Textkritik" (1927), B. G. Teubner Verlag
- Maas, Paul., "Textual Criticism" (1958), Clarendon Press
- Maas Philipp Anderé, "Sāmadhipāda. Das erste Kapitel des Pātañjalayogaśāstra zum ersten Mal kritisch ediert" (2006), Shaker
- Maas, Philipp Anderé, "A Phylogenetic Approach to the Transmission of the Tibetan Kanjur─The Akṣayamatinirdeśa Revisited, In Bauddhasāhityastabakāvalī. Essays and Studies on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature. Dedicated to Claus Vogel by Colleagues, Students, and Friends", pp.229~243 (2008), Indica et Tibetica
- Maas, Philipp Anderé., "Computer Aided Stemmatics—The Case of Fifty-Two Text Versions of Carakasaṃhitā Vimānasthāna 8.67-157", Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 52-53, pp.63~119 (2010)
- Murthy, R. S. Shivaganesha, "Introduction to Manuscriptology" (1996), Sharada Publishing House
- Platnick, Norman I., "Cladistic Methods in Textual, Linguistic, and Phylogenetic Analysis", Systematic Zoology, 26(4), pp.380~385 (1977)
- Timpanaro, Sebastiano, "Die Entstehung der Lachmannschen Methode" (1971), H. Buske
- West, Martin, "Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts" (1973), B. G. Teubner
- Rylands, C. A., "Review: The Mahābhārata. For the first time critically edited by V. S. Sukthankar, with the cooperation of ... other scholars. Fascicule 8, ... edited by Raghu Vira, 1936. Fascicule 9, Udyoga-parvan, part i, edited by S. K. De, 1937. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, (9.4.), pp.1051~ (1939)
- Salomon, Richard, "Indian Epigraphy A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages" (1998), Oxford University Press