중-한 국제결혼의 증가에 따른 가족법의 문제 ―연변조선족의 한-중 “가장혼인”을 중심으로―
The Family Law’s problems caused by increase of international marriages between China and Korea ― The main theme is yeonbyeon Joseon family’s disguised marriage ―
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Self-government state of yeonbyeon Joseon’s China-Korea International marriages are increasing continually because these days, Chinese’sense of values about marriage change much, and they have been generalized social phenomenon. By the way, mostly international marriages’ counterparts are Koreans and most of them are disguised marriages considering its own characteristics, the process of international marriage is made mostly by international marriage intermediation company. The purpose of this text is to analyze and grasp the problems followed by the increase of international marriage China-Korea centering around yeonbyeon joseon family-Koreans’disguised marriage problems. That is, this is for searching the legal countermeasures regarding disguised marriage by analyzing the reason and actual conditions of yeonbyeon self-government state’s internation disguised marriages China-Korea and especially by researching the existence requites and registration procedures for marrying in China’s marriage law, invalid marriage and canceled marriage, judical procedures of international divorce, intermediation of international marriage and so on. China’s marriage law chooses the doctrine of marriage by law built on the doctrine of formal intention and the doctrine of statement. The reason of disguised marriage can’t be found in relation to the invalid marriage and canceled marriage in China’s marriage law. Therefore the system of invalid marriage and canceled marriage in the law should be improved, and the stipulations about disguised marriage should be in law. In conclusion, it is needed that improvement of the law related the substantial examination reinforcement on the China’s registration law of marriage, legislation about disguised marriage on marriage law, amelioration of related procedures, jurisdiction in the code of legal procedure of international marriage, and regulation about marriage brokerage, and simultaneously China-Korea, both countries’ social and legal mutual cooperation is needed.
Abstract
Self-government state of yeonbyeon Joseon’s China-Korea International marriages are increasing continually because these days, Chinese’sense of values about marriage change much, and they have been generalized social phenomenon. By the way, mostly international marriages’ counterparts are Koreans and most of them are disguised marriages considering its own characteristics, the process of international marriage is made mostly by international marriage intermediation company. The purpose of this text is to analyze and grasp the problems followed by the increase of international marriage China-Korea centering around yeonbyeon joseon family-Koreans’disguised marriage problems. That is, this is for searching the legal countermeasures regarding disguised marriage by analyzing the reason and actual conditions of yeonbyeon self-government state’s internation disguised marriages China-Korea and especially by researching the existence requites and registration procedures for marrying in China’s marriage law, invalid marriage and canceled marriage, judical procedures of international divorce, intermediation of international marriage and so on. China’s marriage law chooses the doctrine of marriage by law built on the doctrine of formal intention and the doctrine of statement. The reason of disguised marriage can’t be found in relation to the invalid marriage and canceled marriage in China’s marriage law. Therefore the system of invalid marriage and canceled marriage in the law should be improved, and the stipulations about disguised marriage should be in law. In conclusion, it is needed that improvement of the law related the substantial examination reinforcement on the China’s registration law of marriage, legislation about disguised marriage on marriage law, amelioration of related procedures, jurisdiction in the code of legal procedure of international marriage, and regulation about marriage brokerage, and simultaneously China-Korea, both countries’ social and legal mutual cooperation is needed.
참고문헌 (90)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (1997)
- 곽윤직, (2003)
- 김상용, (2003)
- 김용한, "채권법총론" (1983)
- 김용한, "민법총칙론" (1986)
- 김용한, (2003)
- 김주수, (2007)
- 김준호, "채권총칙 -이론?사례?판례-" (2007)
- 김형배, (1998)
- 김형배, (2007)
- 명순구, "민법총칙" (2005)
- 박동섭, (2006)
- 박병호, "가족법" (1991)
- 박정기, "가족법 -친족상속법-" (2005)
- 송덕수, (2007)
- 양형우, "민법의 세계 -이론과 판례-" (2007)
- 이경희, "유류분제도" (1995)
- 이경희, (2006)
- 이은영, (2006)
- 지원림, (2008)
- 한복룡, "가족법강의" (2007)
- 한봉희, (2007)
- 김능환, "유류분반환청구: 상속법의 제문제", 재판자료, 78 (1998), 대법원 법원행정처
- 김상용, "자녀의 유류분권과 배우자 상속분에 관한 입법론적 고찰, 우리 민법학은 지금 어디에 서 있는가? -한국 민사법학 60년 회고와 전망" (2007)
- 김수정, "遺留分制度의 憲法的 根據와 法政策的 論議 ― 獨逸 聯邦憲法裁判所 決定을 契機로 하여 ―", 가족법연구, 20(2), pp.161~198 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 김형석, "유류분 반환과 부당이득", 민사판례연구, 29 (2007), 민사판례연구회
- 김형석, "양육비청구권을 자동채권으로 하는 상계 -부양청구권의 법적 성질과 관련하여-", 가족법연구, 21(3) (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 변동열, "유류분 제도", 민사판례연구, 25 (2003), 민사판례연구회
- 안영하, "일본의 상속시킨다는 취지의 유언에 대한 일 고찰", 가족법연구, 21(1) (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 양창수, "‘가족법’상의 법률행위의 특성", 민법연구, 8 (2005), 박영사
- 윤진수, "상속법상의 법률행위와 채권자취소권 -상속 포기 및 상속재산 협의분할을 중심으로-", 사법연구, 6 (2001), 청헌법률문화재단
- 최성경, "상속의 승인 및 포기와 채권자취소권", 외법논집, 26 (2007), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 황경웅, "재산분할청구권의 상속성 -민법 제404조의 일신전속권과 제1005조의 일신전속권의 비교-", 중앙법학, 9(2) (2007), 중앙법학회
- 加藤永一, "Ⅰ: 遺留分" (1980)
- 甲斐道太郞, (2001)
- 甲斐道太郞, (2002)
- 高木多喜男, ": 遺留分" (1974)
- 埼玉弁護士會, (2005)
- 內田貴, (2004)
- 淡路剛久, "債權總論" (2002)
- 島津一郞, (2002)
- 鈴木祿彌, (1996)
- 林良平, (1978)
- 福田隆重, ": 家族法" (2004)
- 松川正毅, "民法 親族?相續" (2004)
- 松坂佐一, "債權者代位權の硏究" (1950)
- 於保不二雄, (1972)
- 奧田昌道, (1982)
- 二宮周平, (2005)
- 伊藤昌司, "相續法" (2002)
- 前田達明, "(口述)債權總論" (1993)
- 潮見佳男, (2005)
- 潮見佳男, (2005)
- 佐藤義彦, (2005)
- 中川善之助, "親族法" (1958)
- 中川善之助 編輯代表, (1961)
- 中川善之助, (1988)
- 中川善之助, (2000)
- 平野裕之, (2005)
- 平井宜雄, (1996)
- 高木多喜男, "遺留分減殺請求權の代位行使の許否", 私法判例リマ-クス, (3) (1991)
- 工藤祐巖, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とすることの可否", ジュリスト, (1224) (2002)
- 久保宏之, "遺留分減殺請求權が, 遺留分權利者の債權者による債權者代位權の對象とならないとされた事例", 判例時報, (1673) (1999)
- 久保宏之, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とすることの可否", 私法判例リマ-クス, (26) (2003)
- 大島俊之, "遺留分減殺請求權と債權者代位權", 法律時報, 71(7) (1999)
- 大山和壽, "債權者代位權による遺留分減殺請求權の代位行使の可否", N.B.L, (747) (2002)
- 大西忠重, "遺留分減殺請求權の代位行使の可否", 判例タイムズ, 50(20) (1999)
- 瀨戶口壯夫, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とすることの可否", 法曹時報, 56(5) (2004)
- 木下重康, "遺留分減殺請求權の代位行使の可否", 判例タイムズ, 42(22) (1991)
- 山口純夫, "遺留分減殺請求權の代位行使の可否", 判例タイムズ, 42(11) (1991)
- 成澤寬 執筆部分, (2005)
- 床谷文雄 執筆部分, "遺留分と債權者代位, 遺言と遺留分 第2卷: 遺留分" (2003)
- "法學論叢", 2002, ~, pp.京都大學法學會
- 影浦直人, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とすることの可否", 判例タイムズ, 54(21) (2003)
- 右近健男, "遺留分減殺請求は債權者代位權の目的となるか", 判例時報, (1791) (2002)
- 伊藤昌司, "遺留分減殺請求權は債權者代位權の目的になるか", 判例時報, (1415) (1992)
- 伊藤昌司, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とすることの可否", 民商法雜誌, 126(6) (2002)
- 前田陽一, "相續法と取引法 -相續人債權者の債權保全を中心に-", 現代取引法の基礎的課題(椿壽夫先生古稀記念論文集) (1999), 有斐閣
- 前田陽一, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位の目的とするとの可否", 金融法務事情, (1684) (2003)
- 佐藤岩昭, "遺留分減殺請求權を債權者代位權により行使することの可否", 法學敎室, (265) (2002)
- 佐藤義彦, "身分行爲論管見", 現代家族法の課題と展望(太田武男先生還曆記念論文集) (1982), 有斐閣
- 中田裕康, "相續人の債權者は, 特段の事情がある場合を除き, 相續人の遺留分減殺請求權を代位行使することができない", 法學協會雜誌, 119(11) (2002)
- 潮見佳男, "遺留分減殺請求權の行使 -物權的效果および一身專屬性の原則の檢證-", 法律時報, 75(12) (2003)
- 泉久雄, "身分行爲, 親族法論集" (1991)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 21(9)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 37(8)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 28(6)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 50(1)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 53(5)
- "最高裁判所判例集", 55(6)