본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한주민의 상속권 ―특별법 제정 논의를 중심으로―

On North Koreans’ Exertion of the Inheritance Rights in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

North Korean’s exertion of the inheritance rights in Sough Korea should be considered in the light of the special situation of South Korea and North Korea as divided countries. It may be possible to limit North Koreans’ interitance in South Korea. However, the total denial of their rights should not be permitted because it may infringe the property right guaranteed by the Constitution. The legal portion of legacy should be based on the principle of the equal division of inheritance, with consideration of the contribution part to achieve equity for the parties concerned. Also, certain countermeasures may be required to prevent a legal disorder in the current inheritance laws by the exertion of North Korean inheritance rights. For instance, limiting the inheritance value could be one. However, North Koreans’ acquisition of property rights in South Korea should not be permitted. Considering the fact that South Koreans are not allowed to exert the inheritance in North Korea and the gap of economic power between the South and the North, the transfer of North Koreans' inheritance value from South Korea to North Korea should be limited not to infringe the North Koreans’ property rights. Parts of the current laws impede North Korean’s exertion of the inheritance rights. Thus, it is necessary to reform those laws to make it possible to cancel the absence sentence for those who is alive in North Korea and to enable them to exert their inheritance rights. Also the limitation of a claim for recapture of estate should be adjusted. It should be reminded that an enactment of the special law can be effective only when a judicial assistance between South and North Korea is made.

Abstract

North Korean’s exertion of the inheritance rights in Sough Korea should be considered in the light of the special situation of South Korea and North Korea as divided countries. It may be possible to limit North Koreans’ interitance in South Korea. However, the total denial of their rights should not be permitted because it may infringe the property right guaranteed by the Constitution. The legal portion of legacy should be based on the principle of the equal division of inheritance, with consideration of the contribution part to achieve equity for the parties concerned. Also, certain countermeasures may be required to prevent a legal disorder in the current inheritance laws by the exertion of North Korean inheritance rights. For instance, limiting the inheritance value could be one. However, North Koreans’ acquisition of property rights in South Korea should not be permitted. Considering the fact that South Koreans are not allowed to exert the inheritance in North Korea and the gap of economic power between the South and the North, the transfer of North Koreans' inheritance value from South Korea to North Korea should be limited not to infringe the North Koreans’ property rights. Parts of the current laws impede North Korean’s exertion of the inheritance rights. Thus, it is necessary to reform those laws to make it possible to cancel the absence sentence for those who is alive in North Korea and to enable them to exert their inheritance rights. Also the limitation of a claim for recapture of estate should be adjusted. It should be reminded that an enactment of the special law can be effective only when a judicial assistance between South and North Korea is made.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 권순한, "남북한 가족법의 통합과 법률문제", 연세법학연구, 7(1) (2000), 연세법학연구회
  2. 배금자, "북한주민소송. in: 시민과 변호사" (2004), 서울지방변호사회
  3. 법무부, "중국과 대만의 교류협력 법제 연구", 법무자료, (279) (2008)
  4. 법원행정처, "독일통일과 사법통합" (1995)
  5. 법원행정처, "북한의 가족법" (1998)
  6. 소재선, "이산가족의 재결합에 따른 가족법상의 제문제", 가족법 연구, (10) (1993), 한국가족법학회
  7. 신영호, "이산가족의 생사확인과 재회에 따른 가족법상의 몇 가지 문제" (2000), 대한변협신문
  8. 신영호, "이산가족의 재결합에 따른 가족법상의 문제", 사회과학논총, (7) (1995), 성신여자대학교 사회과학연구소
  9. 양건, "헌법강의" (2007), 법문사
  10. 윤상도, "남북한 주민 사이의 불법행위로 인한 손해배상 사건의 법적 문제. in: 통일사법정책연구(1)" (2006), 법원행정처
  11. 이승련, "남북한 사이의 사법공조 방안. in: 통일사법정책연구(2)" (2008), 법원행정처
  12. 이은정, "중국과 대만의 교류협력실태 및 법적 분쟁의 해결. in: 남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(2)" (2003), 법원행정처
  13. 이준일, "재산권에 관한 법이론적 이해 - 규칙", 원칙 모델(rule, 공법학연구, pp.2006, 7(2)[DOI]
  14. 이효원, "북한이탈주민의 이혼소송과 북한주민의 법적 지위", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.425~460 (2008), 한국가족법학회
  15. 이효원, "남북교류협력의 규범체계" (2006), 경인문화사
  16. 임복규, "남북한 주민 간의 상속 관련 쟁점 해결방안", 법원행정처 특수사법제도연구위원회 제23차 발표문 (2009)
  17. 임성권, "남북한 주민 사이의 가족법적 문제", 비교사법, 8(2) (2001)
  18. 임성권, "북한주민과 관련한 가사분쟁의 특수문제", 2006년 국제사법학회 학술발표회 발표문 (2006)
  19. 장명봉, "통일 및 관련법제의 쟁점과 전망 - 남북관계의 변화와 영토조항 및 북한주민의 법적지위 논쟁을 중심으로-", 법제연구, (35), pp.211~244 (2008), 한국법제연구원
  20. 장영수, "헌법학(제4판)" (2009), 홍문사
  21. 정상규, "탈북자 이혼사건에 관한 연구", 사법논집, (38) (2004)
  22. 제성호, "남북이산가족의 재결합에 따른 법적 문제점과 해결방안", 연구논문, 91 (1991), 통일원
  23. 제성호, "남북한 특수관계론: 법적 문제와 그 대책" (1995), 한울 아카데미
  24. 최금숙, "북한주민의 상속권보호를 위한 고찰", 가족법연구, 15(1) (2001), 한국가족법학회
  25. 최달곤, "남북이산가족 재결합에 따르는 법적 문제점", 북한학연구, (창간) (2000), 고려대학교북한연구소
  26. 통일부 통일교육원, "통일문제 이해" (2009)
  27. 통일부, "개정 『남북교류협력에 관한 법률』해설집", ~ (2009)
  28. 한기종, "중국과 대만 양안 관련 상속문제의 법적 처리", 가족법연구, 17(2), pp.8~258 (2003), 한국가족법학회
  29. 허영, "한국헌법론" (2008), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)