본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남북주민의 가족관계와 상속 —「남북 주민 사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법」을 중심으로—

The Inheritance Rights and Family Relations of North and South Koreans —Focusing on Special Act on the Inheritance Rights and Family Relations of North and South Koreans—

0

조회

0

다운로드

25

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

It has been over half a century since the Separation of North and South Korea. There are people whose family members are not allowed to live together though the rest are accustomed to this circumstances. Fortunately, government and NGO are endeavoring to relieve the burden of separated families humanistically. So comes the increase of contacts between two people and uprising of legal issues. In cope with these, there have been assertions to prepare for the problems like the inheritance rights and family relations of North and South Koreans. Even, some of those issues were took into courts. Since the Civil Law was not meant to deal with special circumstance like the separation of Korea, there was need to make special Acts. The Ministry of Justice arranged 'The Inheritance Rights and Family Relations of North and South Koreans' and it was publicated on 10th of February, 2012, after getting assent from Assembly. This study was intended to introduce and review the special Acts. The Acts consist of 6 chapters and 23 articles and deal with jurisdiction, family relations, inheritance and management of property, though this study deals only with enacting process, the explanation of the articles and reviews. Principal reviews are on bigamy, the adjudication of disappearance, the suit of confirmation of existence of biological parental relation, the suit of claim for recognition, the return of inherited property, the claim for recovery of inheritance and qualified acceptance. The parts dealing with family relations and inheritance rights of North Koreans are generally persuasive and reasonable, although in its detail it needs amendments and it needs more coverage on legislation. So, this study suggests a few ideas on legislation. Firstly, it would be better if the sentences of the articles were not complicated. Secondly, special regulations on the extension of exclusion period of the claim for recovery of inheritance. And thirdly, it is better to keep the stance of not approving special law on extinctive prescription of rights to claim the return of the legal reserve of inheritance. In legislation, it could be the decision of legal policy, nevertheless legislation should be balanced between specific reasonability and legal stability. In other words, microcalibration of legislation to permit each North Koreans and related South Koreans better reasonability and also legally acceptable and at the same time, to give least impact on the stability of contracts.

Abstract

It has been over half a century since the Separation of North and South Korea. There are people whose family members are not allowed to live together though the rest are accustomed to this circumstances. Fortunately, government and NGO are endeavoring to relieve the burden of separated families humanistically. So comes the increase of contacts between two people and uprising of legal issues. In cope with these, there have been assertions to prepare for the problems like the inheritance rights and family relations of North and South Koreans. Even, some of those issues were took into courts. Since the Civil Law was not meant to deal with special circumstance like the separation of Korea, there was need to make special Acts. The Ministry of Justice arranged 'The Inheritance Rights and Family Relations of North and South Koreans' and it was publicated on 10th of February, 2012, after getting assent from Assembly. This study was intended to introduce and review the special Acts. The Acts consist of 6 chapters and 23 articles and deal with jurisdiction, family relations, inheritance and management of property, though this study deals only with enacting process, the explanation of the articles and reviews. Principal reviews are on bigamy, the adjudication of disappearance, the suit of confirmation of existence of biological parental relation, the suit of claim for recognition, the return of inherited property, the claim for recovery of inheritance and qualified acceptance. The parts dealing with family relations and inheritance rights of North Koreans are generally persuasive and reasonable, although in its detail it needs amendments and it needs more coverage on legislation. So, this study suggests a few ideas on legislation. Firstly, it would be better if the sentences of the articles were not complicated. Secondly, special regulations on the extension of exclusion period of the claim for recovery of inheritance. And thirdly, it is better to keep the stance of not approving special law on extinctive prescription of rights to claim the return of the legal reserve of inheritance. In legislation, it could be the decision of legal policy, nevertheless legislation should be balanced between specific reasonability and legal stability. In other words, microcalibration of legislation to permit each North Koreans and related South Koreans better reasonability and also legally acceptable and at the same time, to give least impact on the stability of contracts.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 고상용, "민법총칙" (2003), 법문사
  2. 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2010), 박영사
  3. 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
  4. 김상용, "남북주민 사이의 중혼 등 가족관계 문제해결—‘남북주민사이의 가족관계와 상속등에 관한 특례법안’ 입법 취지와 해설,", 법무사, 대한법무사협회, ~ (2011)
  5. 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
  6. 김주수, "민법총칙" (2002)
  7. 김상용, "친족상속법" (2011), 법문사
  8. 김학동, "민법총칙" (2001), 박영사
  9. 문흥안, "가족법상 북한이탈주민의 남한사회 정착 지원 방안에 관한 연구 -이혼의 특례를 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.391~428 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  10. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
  11. 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2006), 제일법규
  12. 배금자, "북한 주민 소송", 시민과 변호사, 서울지방변호사회, ~ (2004)
  13. 백태승, "민법총칙" (2009), 법문사
  14. 국회의안정보시스템, "법제사법위원회", ~ (2011)
  15. 국회의안정보시스템, "법제사법위원회", ~ (2011)
  16. 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2011), 박영사
  17. 시진국, "재판에 의한 상속재산분할", 사법논집, 42 (2006), 법원도서관
  18. 신영호, "남북 이산가족 사이의 상속관련 문제해결—‘남북주민사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법안’ 입법 취지와 해설,", 법무사, 대한법무사협회, ~ (2011)
  19. "이산가족 문제해결 더 이상 늦출 수 없다" (2011), 오충석[URL]
  20. 이성우, "이산가족의 재결합에 따른 상속의 문제와 그 해결방안", 통일과 법률, 법무부, ~ (2011)
  21. 이은영, "민법총칙" (2009), 박영사
  22. 이은정, "북한주민의 상속권 ―특별법 제정 논의를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.149~178 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  23. 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
  24. 최금숙, "북한이탈주민의 상속권 보호를 위한 고찰", 가족법연구 (2001), 한국가족법학회
  25. 최금숙, "북한이탈주민의 婚姻 및 離婚에 관한 법적 고찰", 법학논집, 15(3), pp.107~138 (2011), 법학연구소
  26. 한상호, "민법주해(Ⅰ)" (2004), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)