분단경험과 남북한 상속법 - 북한 상속법을 중심으로 -
The division of the nation and its influence on the Korean inheritance law ―Focusing on the North Korean Case―
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research paper studies the changes in both South and North Korean inheritance laws after the division of the nation, and also explores the recent updates in the North Korean inheritance law, the difference between South and North Korean inheritance law and their integration methods. Upon the codification of the inheritance regulations, South Korea, whose civil law was enacted in 1958, codified much faster than North Korea. Inheritance regulations are stated in Part V of the South Korean civil law. However, North Korea codified its inheritance regulations in 1990 as its family law was enacted. Its inheritance law was independently established later in 2002. Upon the changes in the inheritance system after the division, many of the regulations in South Korea have taken the issue of gender inequality into account. On the other hand, North Korean inheritance law has already considered gender equality from its enactment. After 1990, as South Korea revised the Rankings of the Legal Heir and Legal Portions in Inheritance in its civil law in consideration of gender equality, the gap between South Korean and North Korean laws has been narrowed. Still, one huge difference is that, distinct from that in South Korea, North Korean law does not allow one to privately own and inherit the means of production such as land or building. Also, since North Korean inheritance law specifically mentions the Inheritance by Will, one can select or exclude the heir or differentiate the amount of inheritance. Such difference between South Korean and North Korean inheritance laws is due to their distinct political circumstances. Unifying their laws would not be easy, but not impossible. South Korean inheritance law has shown its improvements in considering the issue of gender inequality, and also North Korean inheritance law has broadened the subjects of inheritable properties. Except for their limits on the inheritable property, many legal aspects of North Korean inheritance law are more reasonable when compared to those of South Korean law. Especially, “Freedom of Making Wills” is the basic principle of the modern inheritance law and in order to put this into practice, it is necessary that one admits the inheritance by will and reduces the legally secured portions. In this context, the North Korean regulations regarding the inheritance by will and the legally secured portions are worth looking into.
Abstract
This research paper studies the changes in both South and North Korean inheritance laws after the division of the nation, and also explores the recent updates in the North Korean inheritance law, the difference between South and North Korean inheritance law and their integration methods. Upon the codification of the inheritance regulations, South Korea, whose civil law was enacted in 1958, codified much faster than North Korea. Inheritance regulations are stated in Part V of the South Korean civil law. However, North Korea codified its inheritance regulations in 1990 as its family law was enacted. Its inheritance law was independently established later in 2002. Upon the changes in the inheritance system after the division, many of the regulations in South Korea have taken the issue of gender inequality into account. On the other hand, North Korean inheritance law has already considered gender equality from its enactment. After 1990, as South Korea revised the Rankings of the Legal Heir and Legal Portions in Inheritance in its civil law in consideration of gender equality, the gap between South Korean and North Korean laws has been narrowed. Still, one huge difference is that, distinct from that in South Korea, North Korean law does not allow one to privately own and inherit the means of production such as land or building. Also, since North Korean inheritance law specifically mentions the Inheritance by Will, one can select or exclude the heir or differentiate the amount of inheritance. Such difference between South Korean and North Korean inheritance laws is due to their distinct political circumstances. Unifying their laws would not be easy, but not impossible. South Korean inheritance law has shown its improvements in considering the issue of gender inequality, and also North Korean inheritance law has broadened the subjects of inheritable properties. Except for their limits on the inheritable property, many legal aspects of North Korean inheritance law are more reasonable when compared to those of South Korean law. Especially, “Freedom of Making Wills” is the basic principle of the modern inheritance law and in order to put this into practice, it is necessary that one admits the inheritance by will and reduces the legally secured portions. In this context, the North Korean regulations regarding the inheritance by will and the legally secured portions are worth looking into.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김정금, "가족법" (1985), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 김정숙, "공화국상속법에 규제된 상속권의 기본원칙", 사회과학원학보 루계, (36) (2002), 사회과학출판사
- 리송녀, "법학론문집 7" (1990), 과학백과사전종합출판사
- 문철만, "법학연구논문집 22, 조선사회과학학술집 415 법학편" (2010), 사회과학출판사
- "민법 1(심의용)" (1973), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997), 사회안전부출판사
- 사회과학원 법학연구소, "법학사전" (1971), 사회과학출판사
- 서창섭, "공화국 민법전 체계에 대하여", 민주사법, (5) (1959)
- 윤종철, "법학론문집 5, 과학" (1985), 백과사전 출판사
- 조일호, "조선가족법(대학용)" (1958), 교육도서출판사
- 필자미상, "공화국 민법전(초안)중 저작권법, 창의고안권법 및 상속권법편의 몇 가지 문제", 민주사법, (10) (1959), 사법성 민주사법 편집위원회
- 필자미상, "조선민주주의인민공화국의 민사규정과 관련한 자료(민사규정은 1986.1.30. 중앙인민위원회 정령으로 채택됨)", ~ (1986)
- 곽윤직, "相續法" (2001), 박영사
- 김영규, "최근 남북한 가족법의 변모와 그 접근가능성", 법학논총, 20, pp.21~55 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김영기, "남한 내 북한주민 관련 가족법적 실무상 쟁점", 사법, 1(31), pp.155~209 (2015), 사법발전재단
- 소재선, "유류분제도의 새로운 방향성 모색과 북한의 유류분", 법학연구, 53(2), pp.131~161 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 신영호, "共同相續論" (1987), 나남
- 신영호, "相續順位와 相續分", 가족법연구, (4) (1990), 한국가족법학회
- 신영호, "북한법의 체계와 특색" (1994), 세종연구소
- 신영호, "북한의 제정상속법의 동향과 평가", 북한법 연구, 8 (2009)
- 신영호, "러시아민법전", 금산법학, (5) (2010), 세창출판사
- 신영호, "로스쿨가족법강의" (2013), 세창출판사
- 신영호, "통일단계에서의 민법 친족·상속편의 북한주민 적용방안에 관한 연구", 통일과법률, (7) (2011)
- 이상욱, "중국의 상속법(繼承法) 개정 논의와 전망", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.319~342 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "북한주민의 상속권 ―특별법 제정 논의를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.149~178 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 전경근, "북한주민의 상속에 관한 제문제 - 대법원 2013. 7. 25. 선고 2011므3105 판결을 중심으로", 아주법학, 8(4), pp.13~36 (2015), 법학연구소
- 정광현, "한국가족법연구" (1967), 서울대학교 출판부
- 정구태, "북한 주민의 상속회복청구권 행사와 제척기간 -서울남부지방법원 2014. 1. 21. 선고, 2011가단83213 판결-", 아주법학, 8(1), pp.221~254 (2014), 법학연구소
- 정구태, "2014년 친족상속법 관련 주요 판례 회고", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 18(2), pp.121~185 (2015), 민사법의 이론과 실무학회
- 최달곤, "러시아공화국민법전", 북한법률행정논총, 3 (1979), 고려대학교 법률행정연구소
- 최달곤, "북한법의 체계와 특색" (1994), 세종연구소
- 최성경, "남북주민의 가족관계와 상속 —「남북 주민 사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법」을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 26(1), pp.171~208 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 大內憲昭, "朝鮮民主主義人民共和國の民法(2)", 關東學院大學文學部 昭和60年度紀要, (46) (1986)
- 鈴木 賢, "變動する社會主義法-基本槪念の再檢討" (1991), 法律文化社
- "국가법령정보센터"[URL]
- "통일법제데이터베이스"[URL]
