분단과 남·북한 친족법의 변화
Division of South and North Korea and Changes in Family Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how the family law has been settled and developed since the emancipation from Japanese colonial era throughout the time where South and North Korea maintain as divided. The study flows from introduction of the topic in Part I to actions taken by South and North Korea against division of Korea peninsula in Part II. Then it further investigates main issues and changes in background through the history in Part III until it reaches to a conclusion in Part IV. Family law in South Korea that played a main role to stabilize patriarchal family system in the capitalistic society since the emancipation of Japanese colonial era is currently operated to support the realization of gender equality that is centered on husband and wife by abolishing the patriarchal family system. On the other hand, North Korean law concerning the family issues, where this paper lays special emphasis, has been managed as a special law for the past 70 years since the liberation as it severed from the capitalism while embracing the socialist system. As a result, most of its legal structure and contents from the past have been succeeded as is into North Korea’s modern family law in 1990’s. Socialist political·economic systems that North Korea accepted support nationalization of production methods which in turn requires abolition of private property system. This turned out to lead the collapse of feudal patriarchal family system by directly impacting the family system that stands on the basis of land. Although it is undeniable that of feudal patriarchal family system positive impact on strengthening female rights, each individual including female is just an expendable for socialist revolution led by the political party and leader in North Korea despite of all the efforts to cut off the vicious circle of customs from the feudal age through the legal enforcement such as “Act on Equality in Gender”. Even the regulation of family law for child benefit promotion is also in fact a way of training foster for communist revolution. One of the purposes of the communist revolution is to dissolve the individual’s family. This ironically has accomplished consolidation of family in North Korea as the measures of revolution resulted in gathering of smaller groups for the revolution. The paper explores in depth to study the reasons and seek solution for ongoing issues caused by the remarriage of North Korean refugees as well. If the integration of family law in North Korea is discussed henceforth under the circumstance where it can’t avoid accepting capitalism, the removal of socialistic views and vestiges of self-reliance ideology should be preceded, focusing on the practical functions of the newly integrated family system. There will be a limit for North Korean people to adapt to South Korean system by merely enforcing the letter of the law while leaving what they have been accustomed over the past 70 years behind. This needless to say puts significant importance to broaden the ability to understand theoretical background of North Korean family law and legal terms to increase efficiency toward the actual integration of South and North Korea.
Abstract
This paper examines how the family law has been settled and developed since the emancipation from Japanese colonial era throughout the time where South and North Korea maintain as divided. The study flows from introduction of the topic in Part I to actions taken by South and North Korea against division of Korea peninsula in Part II. Then it further investigates main issues and changes in background through the history in Part III until it reaches to a conclusion in Part IV. Family law in South Korea that played a main role to stabilize patriarchal family system in the capitalistic society since the emancipation of Japanese colonial era is currently operated to support the realization of gender equality that is centered on husband and wife by abolishing the patriarchal family system. On the other hand, North Korean law concerning the family issues, where this paper lays special emphasis, has been managed as a special law for the past 70 years since the liberation as it severed from the capitalism while embracing the socialist system. As a result, most of its legal structure and contents from the past have been succeeded as is into North Korea’s modern family law in 1990’s. Socialist political·economic systems that North Korea accepted support nationalization of production methods which in turn requires abolition of private property system. This turned out to lead the collapse of feudal patriarchal family system by directly impacting the family system that stands on the basis of land. Although it is undeniable that of feudal patriarchal family system positive impact on strengthening female rights, each individual including female is just an expendable for socialist revolution led by the political party and leader in North Korea despite of all the efforts to cut off the vicious circle of customs from the feudal age through the legal enforcement such as “Act on Equality in Gender”. Even the regulation of family law for child benefit promotion is also in fact a way of training foster for communist revolution. One of the purposes of the communist revolution is to dissolve the individual’s family. This ironically has accomplished consolidation of family in North Korea as the measures of revolution resulted in gathering of smaller groups for the revolution. The paper explores in depth to study the reasons and seek solution for ongoing issues caused by the remarriage of North Korean refugees as well. If the integration of family law in North Korea is discussed henceforth under the circumstance where it can’t avoid accepting capitalism, the removal of socialistic views and vestiges of self-reliance ideology should be preceded, focusing on the practical functions of the newly integrated family system. There will be a limit for North Korean people to adapt to South Korean system by merely enforcing the letter of the law while leaving what they have been accustomed over the past 70 years behind. This needless to say puts significant importance to broaden the ability to understand theoretical background of North Korean family law and legal terms to increase efficiency toward the actual integration of South and North Korea.
참고문헌 (71)
- 김대웅, "가족의 기원" (1985), 아침
- 김수행, "젊은 지성을 위한 자본론" (2012), 두리미디어
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김주수, "친족 상속법" (2006), 법문사
- 대륙연구소, "북한법령집(제1권)" (1990), 대륙연구소
- 박병호, "친족법교재" (1991), 한국방송통신대학
- 북한김정일체제의 법제정비 현황과 전망, "박정원", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2002)
- 북한법률용어분석 3(민사법편), "박정원", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1997)
- 방찬영, "기로에 선 조선민주주의인민공화국" (1995), 박영사
- 법무부, "북한민법 주석", 법무부, ~ (2014)
- 북한법령 연구, "법무부", 법무부, ~ (2012)
- 법제처, "독일통일관계법연구(Ⅱ)", 법제자료, 161 (1992)
- 법원행정처, "북한의 가족법", 법원행정처, ~ (1998)
- 법원행정처, "가족관계의 등록 등에 관한 법률해설", ~ (2007)
- 북한연구소, "북한 가족법과 가정실태" (1991), 북한연구소
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2013), 세창출판사
- 장명봉, "2013 최신 북한법령집" (2013), 북한법연구회
- 최달곤, "북한혼인법" (1977), 고려대학교 출판부
- 최달곤, "북한민법의 연구" (1998), 세창출판사
- 최달곤, "북한법입문" (1998), 세창출판사
- 한봉희, "가족법" (2007), 푸른세상
- 김성숙, "북한가족법상의 가정-가정 의 장을 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 13 (1999)
- 김영규, "남북한 친자법의 비교연구", 비교법학, 10 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 김영규, "북한가족법상의 후견제도", 법학논총, 23(1) (1997), 단국대 법학연구소
- 김영규, "최근 남북한 가족법의 변모와 그 접근가능성", 법학논총, 20, pp.21~55 (2008), 법학연구소
- 문흥안, "가족법상 북한이탈주민의 남한사회 정착 지원 방안에 관한 연구 -이혼의 특례를 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.391~428 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 문흥안, "북한 가족법제의 동향과 남북 가족법제 통합의 방향", 법조, 64(11), pp.5~84 (2015), 법조협회[DOI]
- 박복순, "통일대비 남북한 가족 관련 법제 비교 및 통합의 기본방향", 통일과 법률, 통권 : 21 (2015), 법무부
- 북한의 유교적 전통윤리 정책: 가족윤리·법을 중심으로, "부남철", 통일원, ~ (1992)
- 소재선, "유류분제도의 새로운 방향성 모색과 북한의 유류분", 법학연구, 53(2), pp.131~161 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 신영호, "북한가족법의 내용과 그 특색", 북한법연구 (1994), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 신영호, "북한 상속법의 동향과 평가", 북한 60년: 북한법의 어제와 오늘(광복 60주년기념학술대회) (2005), 북한법연구회
- 신영호, "남북 이산가족 사이의 상속 관련 문제 해결-특례법안 입법취지와 해설-", 남북 주민 사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법 제정 공청회 자료 (2010)
- 신영호, "북한법 체계와 특색" (1994), 세종연구소
- 신영호, "통일단계에서의 민법 친족·상속편의 북한주민 적용방안에 관한 연구", 통일과법률, 통권 : 7 (2011)
- 신영호, "북한가족법의 회고와 전망", 북한법률행정논집, 10 (1995), 고려대 법학연구원
- 신영호, "북한가족법의 제정과 그 특색", 북한법률행정논집, 9 (1992), 고려대 법학연구원
- 신진화, "통일사법정책연구(1)" (2006), 법원행정처
- 이문웅, "북한의 가족과 친족제도:연속과 변용", 평화연구, 14 (1989)
- 이은정, "북한주민의 상속권 ―특별법 제정 논의를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.149~178 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "북한 가족법의 변화와 전망", 북한법연구, (7)
- 이정식, "북한에서의 소유제도의 발전과 북한민법상 소유권에 관한 고찰", 사회과학논총, 14 (1998)
- 남북이산가족의 재결합에 따른 법적 문제점과 해결방안, "제성호", 통일원, ~ (1991)
- 최금숙, "북한주민의 상속권 보호를 위한 고찰", 가족법연구, 15(1) (2001)
- 최달곤, "북한가족법의 최근의 변화", 가족법연구, 6 (1992)
- 최달곤, "한국, 북한 가족법의 이질성과 동질성", 가족법연구, 3 (1989)
- 최성경, "남북주민의 가족관계와 상속 —｢남북 주민 사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법｣을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 26(1), pp.171~208 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 한기종, "남북한 및 해협양안의 이산부부 혼인관계에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, 21(2), pp.147~165 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 함영주, "북한 민사소송법과 중국 민사소송법의 상호관련성에 관한 고찰", 민사소송, 10(1), pp.177~204 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
- 홍창우, (2011), 법원행정처
- 大內憲昭, "法律からみた北朝鮮の家族, 社會, 國家制度", 統一評論 (1992)
- 김일성종합대학출판사, "가족법" (1985), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 김일성종합대학출판사, "민법(1)" (1973), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 김정금, "가족법" (1985), 김일성종합대학출판사
- 김정금, "민사소송법" (1987), 김일성종합대학출판사
- "민족주의민주전선, 조선해방년보", 우리서원, ~ (1946)
- 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997), 사회안전부출판사
- "조선민주주의인민공화국 법전" (2012), 법률출판사
- 조일호, "조선가족법" (1958), 교육도서출판사
- 김봉철, "화국법해설(오우찌 노리아끼가 제기한 질문에 대한 대답)", 북한사회과학원 법학연구소, ~ (2000)
- 김일성, "인민공화국수립의 길-중요보고집" (1974), 북조선임시위원회선전부
- 리송녀, "법학론문집(7)" (1990), 과학백과사전출판사
- 리송녀, "조선사회과학학술집 (373)" (2013), 사회과학출판사
- 리송녀, "조선사회과학학술집 (97)" (2010), 사회과학출판사
- 리현숙, "공화국 가족법상 립양제도의 우월성", 김일성종합대학학보(력사, 법학), 39(8) (1993)
- 문철만, "조선사회과학학술집 (415)" (2010), 사회과학출판사
- 백영훈, "공화국가족법에 규제된 결혼제도의 우월성", 김일성종합대학학보(력사, 법학), 55(2) (2009)
- 백영훈, "공화국가족법에 규제된 후견제도에 대한 일반적리해", 김일성종합대학학보, 57(2) (2011)
- 서창섭, "공화국 민법전 체계에 대하여-민법전 초안 토의 사업의 방조를 위하여", ~ (1959)
- "조선민주주의인민공화국의 민사규정과 관련한 자료(중앙인민위원회 정령으로 채택)", ~ (1986)
- 조일호, "과학원 창립5주년 기념 논문집" (1957), 조선민주주의인민공화국 과학원