이혼 시 혼인주택 분할의 결정: 서울가정법원 재판사례의 실증분석
The Determinants of Marital Home Division on Divorce: A Statistical Analysis of Seoul Family Court’s Decisions
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The marital home is a major asset of the family and a place where family life and memories are found as the foundation of living. In the divorce process, whether the couple occupies a marital home and continues to use it is an important issue that affects the lives of minor children and custodians after divorce. However, to date, the nature of the marital home in which the divorcee resides and the factors that determine the occupancy for marital home are not fully discussed. Under this background, this study analyzes the determinants of marital home division. And the empirical analysis using precedent data was used to analyze the determinants of marital home division. In this way, the study examined how the protection of minority children and custodians' housing rights in the divorce process is achieved. According to the analysis, who is the owner of marital home or who has displaced from the marital home is an important factor in determining the marital home division. Though it is more necessary for women to occupy marital home than the man because of the high probability of raising the child after divorce, women inevitably displaceded from marital home in order to avoid certain risks such as lack of economic power or bargaining power or violence of men, resulting in considerable disadvantages of marriage compared to man. This analysis reflects gender differences in the acceptance of domestic violence as well as the conservative gender role values of man, as well as institutional factors such as insufficient protection measures against domestic violence.
Abstract
The marital home is a major asset of the family and a place where family life and memories are found as the foundation of living. In the divorce process, whether the couple occupies a marital home and continues to use it is an important issue that affects the lives of minor children and custodians after divorce. However, to date, the nature of the marital home in which the divorcee resides and the factors that determine the occupancy for marital home are not fully discussed. Under this background, this study analyzes the determinants of marital home division. And the empirical analysis using precedent data was used to analyze the determinants of marital home division. In this way, the study examined how the protection of minority children and custodians' housing rights in the divorce process is achieved. According to the analysis, who is the owner of marital home or who has displaced from the marital home is an important factor in determining the marital home division. Though it is more necessary for women to occupy marital home than the man because of the high probability of raising the child after divorce, women inevitably displaceded from marital home in order to avoid certain risks such as lack of economic power or bargaining power or violence of men, resulting in considerable disadvantages of marriage compared to man. This analysis reflects gender differences in the acceptance of domestic violence as well as the conservative gender role values of man, as well as institutional factors such as insufficient protection measures against domestic violence.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강달원, "예제를 통한 계량경제학" (2013), 시그마프레스
- 강승묵, "별거와 이혼시 혼인주택이용에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 26(2), pp.229~250 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김용원, "이혼시 부부재산분할제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2009
- 류근관, "통계학" (2012), 법문사
- 민유숙, "재산분할에 있어서 분할비율 산정", 저스티스, 34(2) (2000)
- 민유숙, "재산분할제도에 관한 입법론―분할비율을 중심으로", 가족법연구, 5(2) (2001)
- 민유숙, "2013년 친족·상속법 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (440), pp.49~63 (2014), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 박민수, "이혼 후 재산분할의 비율 및 이혼 위자료액의 결정: 2009년~2011년 합의부 재판례의 실증분석", 가족법연구, 28(1), pp.99~132 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 여성·가족 관련 판례에 대한 성인지적 분석 및 입법과제(II), "박복순", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2013)
- 송효진, "이혼시 재산분할에 관한 최근 판례 분석", 가족법연구, 28(1), pp.133~162 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 가족의 사회·경제적 가치 및 가족정책효과 분석, "안종범", 여성가족부, ~ (2011)
- 양현아, "한국가족법 읽기 - 전통, 식민지성, 젠더의 교차로에서" (2011), 창비출판
- 윤철승, "이혼 시 주거이동 결정요인의 성별 차이 분석 - 서울가정법원 판례 분석 -", 주거환경, 14(4), pp.119~133 (2016), 한국주거환경학회
- 윤철승, "이혼 시 거주주택 분할귀속의 결정요인 분석－ 서울가정법원 판례 분석 －", 주거환경, 15(2), pp.35~50 (2017), 한국주거환경학회[DOI]
- 윤철승, "이혼과정에서 거주주택의 점유결정요인에 관한 연구―서울가정법원 판례를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2018
- 이무영, "이혼 결정과정에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석", 박사, 아동복지, pp.2003
- 이성우, "로짓·프로빗모형 응용" (2008), 박영사
- 이화숙, "이혼 후의 경제에 관한 영국의 법과 실제", 가족법연구, 10(10) (1996)
- 최신섭, "별거 중 혼인주택의 분할 또는 단독사용권 ―독일법을 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 21(2), pp.61~84 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 재산분할의 기준 정립을 위한 방안 연구, "최은정", 사법정책연구원, ~ (2016)
- Barros, D. B., "Home as a Legal Concept", Santa Clara Law Review, 46 (2006)
- Davis, M. F., "The marital home : equal or equitable distribution?", The University of Chicago Law Review, 50(3) (1983)
- Gram-Hansen, K., "Home dissolution: What happens after seperation?", Housing Studies, 23(3) (2008)
- Johnson, M. E., "A Home with Dignity: Domestic Violence and Property Rights", Brighum Young University Law Review, 2014(1) (2014)
- Mahon, E., "Post-Seperation Parenting: A study of seperation and divorce agreements made in the Family Law Circuit Courts of Ireland and their implications for parent-child contact and family lives", The National Children’s Strategy Research Series (2011)
- Mulder, C. H., "Union dissolution and mobility: Who moves from the family home after separation?", Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5) (2010)
- Radin, M. J., "Property and Personhood", Stanford Law Review, 34(5) (1982)
- Sheenhan, G., "Division of matrimonial property in Australia", Australian Institute of Family Studies, (25) (2001)
- Turner, B. R., "Unlikely Partners: The Marital Home and the Concept of Separate Property", Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 20 (2006)