본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

잔존배우자의 재혼과 실종선고의 취소

A Study on the Effects of Remarriage of the Missing Person’s Spouse after Judicial Declaration of Disappearance and the Declaration’s Annulment

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Article 27 of Korea Civil Code provides for the Judicial Declaration of Disappearance: (1) If it is uncertain for five years whether an absentee is alive or dead, the court shall, on the application of any person interested or of a public prosecutor, make a judicial declaration of disappearance. (2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also be applicable where the survival or death of a person who was on a battlefield, aboard a sunken vessel or a downed aircraft, or encountered any other peril that might be a cause of death, is not known distinctly for one year after the termination of the war, the sinking of the vessel or the crash of the aircraft, or the end of any other peril. And, Article 29(1) states annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance. If it has been proved that a person against whom a judicial declaration of disappearance has been made, is alive or dead at a time different from that specified in the Article 28, the court shall, on the application of the person himself, any person interested, or a public prosecutor, annul the judicial declaration of disappearance. But such annulment shall not affect the validity of “acts done in good faith, after the judicial declaration of disappearance and prior to its annulment[Art. 29(1)].” It has been argued that the language of 29(1) quoted above shall be applied to remarriage of the missing person’s spouse after judicial declaration of disappearance and prior to its annulment. This paper supports the position that the quoted language should be applied to the remarriage of the spouse. Since the parties of remarriage should be presumed in good faith, the returned missing person being declared annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance, might show one of the parties of remarriage not in good faith when they married. Even though one of the parties of remarriage were not in good faith when they married, the marriage may be bigamy but not crime for Korean Civil law purpose. In the case of bigamy, a claim for annulment of the marriage to the court may be made by claimant such as either party, the spouse, the lineal ascendants, the collateral blood relatives within the fourth degree of relationship, or a public prosecutor(Article 818). This paper also points out followings. To the purpose of bigamy caused by annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance, there is no provision about periods to claim annulment of bigamy and, article 818 provides too wide claimants of annulment.

Abstract

Article 27 of Korea Civil Code provides for the Judicial Declaration of Disappearance: (1) If it is uncertain for five years whether an absentee is alive or dead, the court shall, on the application of any person interested or of a public prosecutor, make a judicial declaration of disappearance. (2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also be applicable where the survival or death of a person who was on a battlefield, aboard a sunken vessel or a downed aircraft, or encountered any other peril that might be a cause of death, is not known distinctly for one year after the termination of the war, the sinking of the vessel or the crash of the aircraft, or the end of any other peril. And, Article 29(1) states annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance. If it has been proved that a person against whom a judicial declaration of disappearance has been made, is alive or dead at a time different from that specified in the Article 28, the court shall, on the application of the person himself, any person interested, or a public prosecutor, annul the judicial declaration of disappearance. But such annulment shall not affect the validity of “acts done in good faith, after the judicial declaration of disappearance and prior to its annulment[Art. 29(1)].” It has been argued that the language of 29(1) quoted above shall be applied to remarriage of the missing person’s spouse after judicial declaration of disappearance and prior to its annulment. This paper supports the position that the quoted language should be applied to the remarriage of the spouse. Since the parties of remarriage should be presumed in good faith, the returned missing person being declared annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance, might show one of the parties of remarriage not in good faith when they married. Even though one of the parties of remarriage were not in good faith when they married, the marriage may be bigamy but not crime for Korean Civil law purpose. In the case of bigamy, a claim for annulment of the marriage to the court may be made by claimant such as either party, the spouse, the lineal ascendants, the collateral blood relatives within the fourth degree of relationship, or a public prosecutor(Article 818). This paper also points out followings. To the purpose of bigamy caused by annulment of judicial declaration of disappearance, there is no provision about periods to claim annulment of bigamy and, article 818 provides too wide claimants of annulment.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 고상룡, "민법총칙" (2004), 법문사
  2. 김재형, "민법총칙 제8판(전면개정)" (2012), 박영사
  3. 권재문, "친권자의 공백 상황에 대처하기 위한 법정대리인의 결정", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.115~146 (2013), 한국가족법학회
  4. 김대규, "실종선고의 취소", 원광법학, 24(4), pp.377~396 (2008), 법학연구소
  5. 김민중, "민법총칙강의" (2008), 로앤피플
  6. 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
  7. 김용한, "친족상속법" (1993), 박영사
  8. 김은아, "민법상 중혼의 제문제", 한양법학, (30), pp.87~101 (2010), 한양법학회
  9. 김상용, "민법총칙" (2011), 삼영사
  10. 김주수, "친족상속법" (2006), 법문사
  11. 김증한, "민법총칙" (1995), 박영사
  12. 남윤봉, "失踪宣告 取消의 效果에 대하여", 재산법연구, 23(2), pp.77~97 (2006), 한국재산법학회
  13. 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2006), 제일법규
  14. 윤형열, "민법총칙" (2006), 법영사
  15. 이경희, "가족법" (2013), 法元社
  16. 이은영, "민법총칙" (2005), 박영사
  17. 정광현, "친족상속법요론" (1961), 법문사
  18. 加藤雅信, "新民法大系, 民法總則" (2005), 有斐閣
  19. 谷口知平, "新版 注釋民法 總則(1)" (1988), 有斐閣
  20. 近江幸治, "民法講義Ⅰ 民法總則" (2012), 成文堂
  21. 四宮和夫, "民法總則" (2010), 弘文堂
  22. 森泉 章, "民法入門·民法總則" (2000), 日本評論社
  23. 我妻榮, "新訂 民法總則" (2012), 岩波書店
  24. 川井 健, "民法槪論Ⅰ 民法總則" (2011), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)