장래의 퇴직급여채권과 재산분할 - 대법원 2014.7.16. 선고 2013므2250 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로 -
A Future Retirement Benefits and a Division of Property —Supreme Court Decision 2013meu2250 Delivered on July 16, 2014—
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Until very recently, A future retirement benefits cannot be included in the list of property division in divorce practice. The Korean Supreme Court has judged that retirement benefits planned to be received after one of the divorcees retires cannot be the object of property division merely due to the chance of receiving it, and has only considered this retirement benefits as a factor in choosing the amount and the means of division. But it is unfair, because the retirement benefits is built up by the cooperation with his/her spouse. However, in this case the Supreme Court was to change the precedent. Through ‘judgement2013Meu2250 of en banc’ announced on July 16, 2014, the Supreme Court accepted demand for change of an object of property division in retirement benefits that has been constantly brought up meanwhile. This allowed married couple to distribute and share their property relationship depending on the substance and liquidate it fairly, when they get a divorce. In addition, the Supreme Court declared a future retirement benefits can be subject to property division for an equal security for the aged after divorce and also suggested prospective direction for division of retirement pension. Since Public officials pension act has revised recently, not only national pension but division method of other pensions is legislated. However, in a situation where many possibilities that division of pension can be ordered at the trial, the significance of judgement is great.
Abstract
Until very recently, A future retirement benefits cannot be included in the list of property division in divorce practice. The Korean Supreme Court has judged that retirement benefits planned to be received after one of the divorcees retires cannot be the object of property division merely due to the chance of receiving it, and has only considered this retirement benefits as a factor in choosing the amount and the means of division. But it is unfair, because the retirement benefits is built up by the cooperation with his/her spouse. However, in this case the Supreme Court was to change the precedent. Through ‘judgement2013Meu2250 of en banc’ announced on July 16, 2014, the Supreme Court accepted demand for change of an object of property division in retirement benefits that has been constantly brought up meanwhile. This allowed married couple to distribute and share their property relationship depending on the substance and liquidate it fairly, when they get a divorce. In addition, the Supreme Court declared a future retirement benefits can be subject to property division for an equal security for the aged after divorce and also suggested prospective direction for division of retirement pension. Since Public officials pension act has revised recently, not only national pension but division method of other pensions is legislated. However, in a situation where many possibilities that division of pension can be ordered at the trial, the significance of judgement is great.
참고문헌 (24)
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2013), 세창출판사
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2006)
- "민법주해(IX)" (1996), 박영사
- 권오봉, "퇴직금, 퇴직연금이 재산분할의 대상이 되는지 여부 －서울가정법원 2011. 8. 25. 선고 2010드합10979, 10986판결 : 확정－", 법학논총, 32(3), pp.177~205 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김동하, "혼인의 해소에 따른 재산분할", 재판실무, 1, 창원지방법원
- 김수정, "이혼으로 인한 재산분할청구권", 사법논집, 40, 법원행정처
- 김승정, "재산분할의 대상이 되는 재산의 확정 새로운 재산적 가치들을 중심으로-", 재판실무연구 (2004), 광주지방법원
- 김원수, "퇴직금이 재산분할의 대상이 되는지 여부", 재판실무, 3, 창원지방법원
- 김자영, "장래의 퇴직급여채권에 대한 재산분할청구에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 38(3), pp.35~48 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김정민, "공무원 퇴직연금수급권에 대한 재산분할(대상판결: 대법원 2014. 7. 16. 선고 2012므2888 전원합의체 판결)", 사법, 1(30), pp.315~352 (2014), 사법발전재단
- 김종우, "가사재판실무연구모임 자료집(VIII)", 서울가정법원
- 민유숙, "재산분할의 구체적 인정범위", 재판자료, 62, 법원도서관
- 민유숙, "재산분할 대상이 되는 재산의 확정에 관한 몇 가지 문제점 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로", 법조, (534, 535)
- 민유숙, "2013년 친족·상속법 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (440), pp.49~63 (2014), 대한변호사협회
- 박민수, "이혼 후 재산분할의 비율 및 이혼 위자료액의 결정: 2009년~2011년 합의부 재판례의 실증분석", 가족법연구, 28(1), pp.99~132 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 박보영, "장래의 퇴직급여가 이혼시 재산분할의 대상이 되는지 여부—대법원 2014.7.16. 선고 2013므2250 판결을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.417~434 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 박지원, "이혼시 퇴직연금 재산분할의 집행법적 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 소고", 민사소송, 18(2), pp.321~360 (2014), 한국민사소송법학회
- 박충규, "사실혼관계해소 경우와 재산분할청구", 청주대 법학논집 (1997)
- 배인구, "연금의 재산분할 대상성에 관한 검토-비교법적 고찰을 중심으로", 사법논집, 50 (2011), 법원도서관
- 송효진, "이혼시 재산분할에 관한 최근 판례 분석", 가족법연구, 28(1), pp.133~162 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 이상훈, "이혼에 따른 재산분할청구사건의 재판실무상 문제점에 대한 고찰", 법조, 42(6)
- 퇴직급여채권—대판 2014.7.16, 2013므2250 전원합의체 판결과 대판 2014.7.16, 2012므2888 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로—, "가족법연구", 2014, 383~416, pp.한국가족법학회
- 차선자, "이혼 시 연금분할을 위한 입법적 제언", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.217~256 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 현소혜, "장래의 퇴직급여와 재산분할", 법학논총, 21(2), pp.309~356 (2014), 법학연구원