본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

장래의 퇴직급여가 이혼시 재산분할의 대상이 되는지 여부—대법원 2014.7.16. 선고 2013므2250 판결을 중심으로—

Whether Division of Property that is subject of Future Retirement Benefits is Possible in the Divorce Procedure —Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2250 Delivered on July 16, 2014—

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The court holds that the property which the husband and wife accumulate together is the object to distribute in the divorce procedure. However the court is the opinion that the retirement benefits is not the object to distribute as the marital property, before it is concreted. But the majority opinion of Supreme Court Decision concluded that division of property is possible even in case the future retirement benefit is not yet concreted. In this study, I supported the majority opinion as following. First, property division system is accepted to settle all property relationships created during the married life at the dissolution of marriage. Also it is unfair, because the retirement benefits is the property which the husband and wife accumulate together during the marriage, even though it is concreted in the future. Besides, the marital property which is concreted not only in divorce procedure already, but also in the future should be acknowledged as the object to distribute. In the Future it is notable in what manner the court will devide the future retirement benefits at the dissolution of marriage and the writer tries to suggest the legislative bill about how to distribute the future retirement benefits.

Abstract

The court holds that the property which the husband and wife accumulate together is the object to distribute in the divorce procedure. However the court is the opinion that the retirement benefits is not the object to distribute as the marital property, before it is concreted. But the majority opinion of Supreme Court Decision concluded that division of property is possible even in case the future retirement benefit is not yet concreted. In this study, I supported the majority opinion as following. First, property division system is accepted to settle all property relationships created during the married life at the dissolution of marriage. Also it is unfair, because the retirement benefits is the property which the husband and wife accumulate together during the marriage, even though it is concreted in the future. Besides, the marital property which is concreted not only in divorce procedure already, but also in the future should be acknowledged as the object to distribute. In the Future it is notable in what manner the court will devide the future retirement benefits at the dissolution of marriage and the writer tries to suggest the legislative bill about how to distribute the future retirement benefits.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 박정기, "가족법" (2006), 박영사
  2. "대법원 95므175판결", ~
  3. "대법원 2000다27084판결", ~
  4. "대법원 2000다5880판결 등", ~
  5. "대법원 1999.6.11. 선고 96므1397판결", ~ (1999)
  6. "대법원 2013.6.20. 선고 2010므4071, 4088 전원합의체 판결 등", ~ (2013)
  7. "대법원 93스6 결정, 대법원 92므501판결, 96므1076판결, 97므1486판결 등", ~
  8. 박동섭, "친족상속법", pp.211~ (2009), 박영사
  9. 이경희, "하급심판례(광주지법가정지판 2005.3.22. 선고 2004드합722·764(확정)", 109~ (2005)
  10. "남편이 공무원퇴직연금을 일시금으로 받지 않고 연금형태로 받기로 선택한 경우라도, 이를 일시금으로 계산하면 1억 3400만 원이 되는데 이를 포함한 전 재산의 40%를 처에게 분할하여 주고, 위자료 5000만 원을 별도로 지급하라고 판결", 법률신문 제3354호, 8~ (2005)
  11. "국민연금법 제64조", ~
  12. "대법원 1997.9.26. 선고 97므 933판결", ~ (1997)
  13. "대법원 2002.9.4. 선고 2001므 718 판결", ~ (2002)
  14. "서울가정법원 2006.4.26. 선고 2004드합 8654 판결", ~ (2006)
  15. "대법원 2014.7.16. 선고 2013므2250 판결", ~ (2014)
  16. "근로자퇴직급여보장법 제7조", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)