가분채권과 상속재산분할
Divisible Claims in the Procedure of Inherited Property Division
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In relation to Inheritance, there should be a fair Distribution among the Heirs. If a Divisible Claim, such as Deposit Bonds, is not recognized as a Subject of inherited Property Division, it impedes fair Division of inherited Assets. In 2016, the Korean Supreme Court decided that Divisible Claim would also be subject to Inherited Property Division exceptionally. But the Scope of the Exception is unclear, and it is questioned whether it would be desirable to make Divisible Claim an Exception for Inherited Property Divisions. In 2016, the Decision of the Japan Supreme Court also considered Deposit Bonds to be Subject to Property Division. However, if the Deposit bonds are viewed as the Subject of inherited Property Division, it becomes difficult for each Heir to dispose it until the Property Division is achieved. Thus, in recent Years, Civil Law Amendments have been made to compensate the Defect . In Conclusion, divisible Claims should ― in principle ― be considered as the Subject of Inherited Property Division. It is reasonable to assume that the Division of Bonds at the Time of Inheritance is only temporary, and that the Attribution of Bonds are decided conclusively by the inherited Property Division.
Abstract
In relation to Inheritance, there should be a fair Distribution among the Heirs. If a Divisible Claim, such as Deposit Bonds, is not recognized as a Subject of inherited Property Division, it impedes fair Division of inherited Assets. In 2016, the Korean Supreme Court decided that Divisible Claim would also be subject to Inherited Property Division exceptionally. But the Scope of the Exception is unclear, and it is questioned whether it would be desirable to make Divisible Claim an Exception for Inherited Property Divisions. In 2016, the Decision of the Japan Supreme Court also considered Deposit Bonds to be Subject to Property Division. However, if the Deposit bonds are viewed as the Subject of inherited Property Division, it becomes difficult for each Heir to dispose it until the Property Division is achieved. Thus, in recent Years, Civil Law Amendments have been made to compensate the Defect . In Conclusion, divisible Claims should ― in principle ― be considered as the Subject of Inherited Property Division. It is reasonable to assume that the Division of Bonds at the Time of Inheritance is only temporary, and that the Attribution of Bonds are decided conclusively by the inherited Property Division.
참고문헌 (34)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2017), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
- 박병호, "가족법" (1991), 한국방송통신대학교출판부
- 신영호, "공동상속론" (1987), 도서출판 나남
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2011), 학현사
- 윤진수, "친족상속법" (2018), 박영사
- "주해상속법 제1권" (2019), 박영사
- 곽민희, "2018년 일본 개정 상속법 개관", 안암법학, (57), pp.61~126 (2018), 안암법학회[DOI]
- 권영준, "2016년 민법 판례 동향", 민사법학, (78) (2017), 한국민사법학회
- 권재문, "상속재산이 변형된 가분채권과 상속재산 분할 - 대법원 2016. 5. 4. 자 2014스122 결정 -", 동북아법연구, 11(1), pp.265~284 (2017), 동북아법연구소[DOI]
- 김성은, "상속가분채권과 「당연분할」법리에 관한 고찰 - 일본 판례와 학설을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 21(1), pp.273~296 (2013), 법학연구소
- 김소영, "상속재산분할", 민사판례연구, 25 (2003), 민사판례연구회
- 김윤정, "상속재산분할의 대상성과 관련한 논의", 사법, 1(15), pp.171~216 (2011), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 김창종, "재판자료 78집 ― 상속법의 제문제" (1998), 법원도서관
- 김형석, "우리 상속법의 비교법적 위치", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.75~126 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 맹광호, "상속재산의 분할과 상속인의 소유권이전등기의무", 법학연구, 18(3), pp.401~431 (2008), 법학연구원
- 박인환, "일본의 상속법 개정동향- 배우자거주권 및 상속재산분할등을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.131~173 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 박태준, "심판에 의한 상속재산 분할", 법조, 49(2) (2000), 법조협회
- 방웅환, "대법원판례해설 제107호(2016년 상)" (2016), 법원도서관
- 정구태, "2016년 가족법 주요 판례 10선" (2017), 세창출판사
- 시진국, "재판에 의한 상속재산분할", 사법논집, 42, pp.655~ (2006), 법원도서관
- 윤진수, "민법논고Ⅴ" (2011), 박영사
- 윤철홍, "공동상속재산의 법적 성질에 관한 소고", 사회과학논총 (2004), 숭실대학교 사회과학연구소
- 이여나, "預貯金債権の遺産分割対象性の判断に関する日本・最高裁平成28年12月19日決定の意義", 법학연구, 26(1), pp.175~196 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이정민, "가분채권(可分債權), 대상재산(代償財産)과 상속재산분할", 민사판례연구, 40 (2018), 민사판례연구회
- 전원열, "채권의 공동상속", 일감법학, (35), pp.215~244 (2016), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 정구태, "2016년 상속법 관련 주요 판례 회고", 법학논총, 24(1), pp.173~215 (2017), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 황정규, "가정법원사건의 제문제(하), 재판자료 제102집" (2003), 법원도서관
- 商事法務, "民法(相續關係)等の改正に關する要綱案｣の槪要(論說)", NBL, (1116) (2018), 株式會社 商事法務