상속재산분할의 전제문제에 관한 소송법적 고찰
A Study on Civil Procedure on the Prerequisites of Division of Inherited Property
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to Korean Civil Act, when there are co-inheritors, they succeed to blanket rights and duties of the inheritee in proportion to their share of the inheritance at the time of the commencement of the inheritance and become co-owners of the inherited property. The co-ownership is settled up by division of inherited property. In regulating inheritance relations, it is necessary to coordinate appropriately an intention of an inheritee and equity and fairness among co-inheritors. Co-inheritors may divide inherited property by their agreement, unless an inheritee determines otherwise in one’s will. If no agreement with regard to the division can be reached among the co-inheritors, any co-inheritor may file a request for an adjudication of the division with a family court. It is stipulated in Family Litigation Act that this adjudication shall be given through no-litigation procedure to realize fair distribution of inherited property among co-inheritors. The family court shall confirm the inheritors and inherited property of an inheritee and calculate the share of inheritance of the inheritors. In the procedure of the division where is aimed at inherited property as an inclusive one and co-inheritors who have various relations with their inheritee, it is likely that there will be the disputes about the prerequisites of the adjudication of the division among the co-inheritors. If the matter which becomes the prerequisite for the adjudication of the division has the nature of a right or a juristic relation, the co-inheritors are afforded the right to opportunity to settle the disputes about it by litigation in connection with the constitutional right of access to courts. In investigating whether or not it is legal to bring an action for confirmation of the prerequisites of the adjudication of the division, we should consider the eligibility to be the objection of the lawsuit for confirmation and the interest of confirmation. If the lawsuit for confirmation of them is lawful, the whole co-ownership relations are the object of this action and the result of such a lawsuit is to be unitedly decided on all co-inheritors. Therefore all co-inheritors should become parties to the lawsuit.
Abstract
According to Korean Civil Act, when there are co-inheritors, they succeed to blanket rights and duties of the inheritee in proportion to their share of the inheritance at the time of the commencement of the inheritance and become co-owners of the inherited property. The co-ownership is settled up by division of inherited property. In regulating inheritance relations, it is necessary to coordinate appropriately an intention of an inheritee and equity and fairness among co-inheritors. Co-inheritors may divide inherited property by their agreement, unless an inheritee determines otherwise in one’s will. If no agreement with regard to the division can be reached among the co-inheritors, any co-inheritor may file a request for an adjudication of the division with a family court. It is stipulated in Family Litigation Act that this adjudication shall be given through no-litigation procedure to realize fair distribution of inherited property among co-inheritors. The family court shall confirm the inheritors and inherited property of an inheritee and calculate the share of inheritance of the inheritors. In the procedure of the division where is aimed at inherited property as an inclusive one and co-inheritors who have various relations with their inheritee, it is likely that there will be the disputes about the prerequisites of the adjudication of the division among the co-inheritors. If the matter which becomes the prerequisite for the adjudication of the division has the nature of a right or a juristic relation, the co-inheritors are afforded the right to opportunity to settle the disputes about it by litigation in connection with the constitutional right of access to courts. In investigating whether or not it is legal to bring an action for confirmation of the prerequisites of the adjudication of the division, we should consider the eligibility to be the objection of the lawsuit for confirmation and the interest of confirmation. If the lawsuit for confirmation of them is lawful, the whole co-ownership relations are the object of this action and the result of such a lawsuit is to be unitedly decided on all co-inheritors. Therefore all co-inheritors should become parties to the lawsuit.
참고문헌 (22)
- 강현중, "민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김상원, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅰ)" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
- 김상원, "주석 신민사소송법(Ⅳ)" (2004), 한국사법행정학회
- 김운호, "채무상속, 재판자료 제78집, 상속법의 제문제", 법원도서관, ~ (1998)
- 김상용, "주석 민법 상속1" (2010), 사법행정학회
- 김상용, "친족상속법" (2011), 법문사
- 김홍규, "민사소송법" (2010), 삼영사
- 박정수, "공동상속인이 다른 공동상속인을 상대로 어떤 재산이 상속재산임의 확인을 구하는 소가 확인의 이익이 있는지 여부 및 그 소의 법적 성질,대법원판례해설 제71호(2007 하반기)", 법원도서관, ~ (2008)
- 박태준, "심판에 의한 상속재산의 분할", 법조, 49(2) (2000), 법조협회
- 송상현, "민사소송법" (2011), 박영사
- 윤진수, "상속재산분할에 있어서 초과특별수익자의 취급", 판례월보, (333) (1998)
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법" (2009), 박영사
- 李垠廷, "特別受益 返還의 法理에 관한 연구 : 민법 제1008조의 해석을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1996
- 임완규, "상속재산분할심판,” 재판자료 제62집, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 법원행정처, ~ (1993)
- 정동윤, "민사소송법" (2008), 법문사
- 梅本吉彦, "具體的相續分の價額又は割合確認の利益, In ジュリスト 別冊 162号" (2002), 有斐閣
- 下村眞美, "具體的相續分確認の訴え, In ジュリスト 別冊 201号" (2010), 有斐閣
- 田中恒朗, "具體的相續分は‘相續分’か‘遺産分割分か’, In 遺産分割の理論と實務" (1993), 判例タイムズ社
- 西原, "特別受益․具體的相續分確認の許否, In 判例タイムズ 43卷 3号" (1992), 判例タイムズ社
- 野村秀敏, "具體的相續分確認の利益, In ジュリスト 別冊 169号" (2003), 有斐閣
- 山本, "遺産分割をめぐる民事訴訟法上の諸問題, In 法學敎室 371号" (2011), 有斐閣
