보호출산제의 시행과 향후 과제
Enforcement of the protected birth and subsequent issues
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to concerns over the side effects of the Birth notification system, which could lead to attempts to give birth outside of hospitals and increase risks to the health and lives of mothers and infants, the Act on Supporting Pregnancies in Crisis and Protected Births and Children Protection was enacted. This resulted in the introduction of the Protected birth system, which came into effect alongside the Birth notification system on July 19, 2024. However, the introduction of the Protected birth system has been controversial from the beginning, and criticisms of the specific contents of the Act have also been raised. Therefore, this article examines the main contents of the Act and the Protected birth system, and reviews the issues of the detailed points to explore the future tasks of the Act and the Protected birth system. Unmarried immigrant women and their children born from them are excluded from the application of the Protected birth system. However, it is not desirable that those who need more protection are excluded from the scope of the Act, so in the future, it is necessary to ensure that the Protected birth system applies to immigrant women and their children. The broad scope of guardians who can make crucial decisions such as determining protected births, and the lack of consideration for potential conflicts of interest among the parties involved, could result in the infringement of the rights of pregnant women in crisis and children, necessitating improvements. There is also a problem in the operation of the Act and the Protected birth system where the rights of biological fathers are not sufficiently reflected. The Act needs to stipulate the obligations of biological fathers, ensuring that their genetic disorders or other health conditions can be collected for the health of the child, even if the father does not wish it. Considering the right of the child to know their bloodline and origins, it is necessary to comprehensively review the regulations on the disclosure of birth certificates and the introduction of remedies by the court in the future. Currently, it is difficult to confirm the effects and side effects of the Protected birth system, and it remains at the level of mere expectations. However, if sufficient cases are accumulated in the future and analyses and reviews based on solid evidence in reality are conducted, it will be possible to more clearly confirm the pros and cons that the Protected birth system will bring to our society. It is necessary to monitor the trends of the Protected birth system.
Abstract
Due to concerns over the side effects of the Birth notification system, which could lead to attempts to give birth outside of hospitals and increase risks to the health and lives of mothers and infants, the Act on Supporting Pregnancies in Crisis and Protected Births and Children Protection was enacted. This resulted in the introduction of the Protected birth system, which came into effect alongside the Birth notification system on July 19, 2024. However, the introduction of the Protected birth system has been controversial from the beginning, and criticisms of the specific contents of the Act have also been raised. Therefore, this article examines the main contents of the Act and the Protected birth system, and reviews the issues of the detailed points to explore the future tasks of the Act and the Protected birth system. Unmarried immigrant women and their children born from them are excluded from the application of the Protected birth system. However, it is not desirable that those who need more protection are excluded from the scope of the Act, so in the future, it is necessary to ensure that the Protected birth system applies to immigrant women and their children. The broad scope of guardians who can make crucial decisions such as determining protected births, and the lack of consideration for potential conflicts of interest among the parties involved, could result in the infringement of the rights of pregnant women in crisis and children, necessitating improvements. There is also a problem in the operation of the Act and the Protected birth system where the rights of biological fathers are not sufficiently reflected. The Act needs to stipulate the obligations of biological fathers, ensuring that their genetic disorders or other health conditions can be collected for the health of the child, even if the father does not wish it. Considering the right of the child to know their bloodline and origins, it is necessary to comprehensively review the regulations on the disclosure of birth certificates and the introduction of remedies by the court in the future. Currently, it is difficult to confirm the effects and side effects of the Protected birth system, and it remains at the level of mere expectations. However, if sufficient cases are accumulated in the future and analyses and reviews based on solid evidence in reality are conducted, it will be possible to more clearly confirm the pros and cons that the Protected birth system will bring to our society. It is necessary to monitor the trends of the Protected birth system.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2024), 법문사
- 출생통보제 도입에 따른 보호출산제도 운영 방안 연구, "변수정", 보건복지부·한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2023)
- 권재문, "출생통보제 도입과 관련된 쟁점들 ―익명출산제, 불법체류 외국인 아동 출생등록제를 중심으로―", 서울법학, 31(4) (2024), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 김상용, "베이비박스, 익명출산, 신뢰출산 ― 끝나지 않는 논쟁", 중앙법학, 25(1) (2023), 중앙법학회
- 김세준, "「위기 임신 및 보호출산 지원과 아동보호에 대한 특별법」의 개선 방향 ―법률의 시행에 즈음하여―", 법학연구, 74 (2024), 전북대학교 법학연구소
- 김영주, "보호출산제의 도입, 우리는 무엇을 준비해야 하는가", 보호출산제, 이대로 괜찮은가? 심포지엄 (2023), 한국여성변호사회
- 김종세, "임신보호출산에 대한 소고", 법학연구, 24(3) (2024), 한국법학회
- 박성민, "보호출산제 찬성 입장과 반대 입장에서 보호해야 할 사항", 인권과 정의, 512 (2023), 대한변호사협회
- 박성민, "아동 이익 최우선 원칙과 보호출산제", 인권과 정의, 499 (2021), 대한변호사협회
- 보호출산제 도입 논의에 대한 검토, "소라미", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2023)
- 소라미, "익명출산제도가 베이비박스의 대안인가 ―베이비박스의 실태와 익명출산제도의 문제점 검토―", 사회보장법연구, 12(1) (2023), 서울대 사회보장법연구회
- 신동현, "독일에서의 베이비박스와 비밀출산법제", 비교사법, 22(4) (2015), 한국비교사법학회
- 신수경, "보호출산제 제정법의 법적 쟁점과 과제", 아세아여성법학, (26) (2023), 세창출판사
- 신수경, "보호출산제 법안의 문제, 여성과 아동 모두를 보호하지 않는 보호출산제 제정법안을 둘러싼 현안과 과제", 강은미 의원실, ~ (2023)
- 신옥주, "보호출산제도 도입을 위한 헌법적 연구", 헌법재판연구, 10(2) (2023), 헌법재판소 헌법재판연구원
- 보호출산제의 쟁점과 향후 과제, "심선희", 경기도여성가족재단, ~, pp.이슈분석 제273호(23-25) (2023)
- 전민경, "포괄적 임신·출산·양육에 관한 권리보장 및 지원법 도입방안 ―보호출산제 폐지 및 모자보건법 개정안, 민주사회를 위한 변론 117호", 민주사회를 위한 변호사모임, ~ (2024)
- 조소연, "입양제도와 보호출산제도상 아동권리의 사각지대 ―제정 「국내입양에 관한 특별법」과 「위기 임신 및 보호출산 지원과 아동 보호에 관한 특별법」을 중심으로―", 윤리연구, (145) (2024), 한국윤리학회
- 한명진, "독일법상 신뢰출산제도의 시행과 평가에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 43(1) (2019), 단국대학교 부설 법학연구소
- 한명진, "「위기임신보호출산법」상의 보호출산제 규정에 대한 비판적 검토: 독일 「임신갈등법」상의 신뢰출산제에 대한 규정과의 비교법적 검토를 중심으로", 중앙법학, 26(2) (2024), 중앙법학회
- 한정숙, "독일의 비밀출산서비스와 한국에 주는 시사점 ―비밀출산 서비스의 내용과 평가에 대한 고찰을 중심으로―", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 18(5) (2018), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 보호출산제, 논쟁의 지점과 숙고할 사안: 출생통보제 도입에 따른 보완·병행 입법 논의에 부쳐, "허민숙", 국회입법조사처, ~, pp.이슈와 논점 제2112호 (2023)
- 허민숙, "위기임신‘보호출산제’, 취약 임산부 지원정책 우선돼야", 법무사, (676) (2023), 대한법무사협회
- 현소혜, "출생통보제 도입 이후의 과제", 유령아동(출생 미등록 아동) 방지와 보호정책마련을 위한 전문가 긴급간담회 (2023), 김영주 의원실
- 고미혜, "벼랑 끝 임산부 위한 보호출산제 국회 통과... ‘병원 밖 출산 줄일까’", 연합뉴스, ~ (2023)
- 국회사무처, "제410회 국회(정기회) 법제사법위원회회의록 제4호", ~ (2023)
- 박하정, "태어난 건 맞는데 어디 있는지 모르는 147명의 아이들 … ‘보편적 출생 등록’ 왜 필요한가", 스브스프리미엄 스프, ~ (2024)
- 보건복지부, "「위기 임신 및 보호출산 지원과 아동보호에 대한 특별법」 국회 본회의 통과", ~ (2023)
- 보건복지부, "출생통보 및 보호출산 제도 도입 추진 계획", ~ (2023)
- 보건복지부, "출생통보제와 위기임신 지원 제도로 어려운 상황의 임산부와 아동 보호", ~ (2024)
- BMFSFJ, "Bericht der Bundesregierung zu den Auswirkungen aller Massnahmen und Hilfsangebote, die auf Grund der Gesetzes zum Ausbau der Hilfen für Schwangere und zur Regelung der vertraulichen Geburt", ~ (2017)
- "Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 18", 13100, 2017
- "United Nations, CRC", C, CO, pp.5-6[DOI]
