우리 민법에서 이혼과 공동양육 논의의 재고
A Reconsideration of Divorce and Co-Parenting in the Korean Civil Law System
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article discusses the Supreme Court’s stance on joint parenting and the designation of co-parents as co-custodians. It argues that while some criticize the position of precedents, joint parenting may actually be detrimental to children’s welfare, and the article focuses on the positive effect of designating one parent as the sole caregiver. The target judgment reversed a decision to designate a co-parent and remanded the case to the lower court. The article analyzes the concept of joint parental authority and joint parenting, considering foreign examples and Korea’s reality. It questions whether joint parenting is the best parenting method for children’s welfare in our civil law system and suggests the significance of the target judgment and the desirable form of joint parenting. This article explores the concept of joint parenting in the Korean Civil Act, specifically the designation of co-parents and sole caregivers. The author examines how the Korean system differs from that of the United Kingdom and the United States, where parental rights and caregivers are not separated. The article argues that joint parental rights and single parenting, rather than joint parenting, are more desirable in Korea, given the practical difficulties and side effects of joint parenting. The author also suggests that expanding the right to interview negotiations for those who are not caregivers could achieve the same purpose as joint parenting. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for careful consideration when deciding on the specific circumstances under which joint parenting should be allowed.
Abstract
The article discusses the Supreme Court’s stance on joint parenting and the designation of co-parents as co-custodians. It argues that while some criticize the position of precedents, joint parenting may actually be detrimental to children’s welfare, and the article focuses on the positive effect of designating one parent as the sole caregiver. The target judgment reversed a decision to designate a co-parent and remanded the case to the lower court. The article analyzes the concept of joint parental authority and joint parenting, considering foreign examples and Korea’s reality. It questions whether joint parenting is the best parenting method for children’s welfare in our civil law system and suggests the significance of the target judgment and the desirable form of joint parenting. This article explores the concept of joint parenting in the Korean Civil Act, specifically the designation of co-parents and sole caregivers. The author examines how the Korean system differs from that of the United Kingdom and the United States, where parental rights and caregivers are not separated. The article argues that joint parental rights and single parenting, rather than joint parenting, are more desirable in Korea, given the practical difficulties and side effects of joint parenting. The author also suggests that expanding the right to interview negotiations for those who are not caregivers could achieve the same purpose as joint parenting. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for careful consideration when deciding on the specific circumstances under which joint parenting should be allowed.
참고문헌 (44)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2015), 법문사
- 양혜원, "자녀 양육권에 관한 비교법적 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2012
- 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2022), 박영사
- 정진아, "이혼 시 친권자 및 양육자 결정―代案으로서의 共同養育 검토", pp.2016
- 민유숙, "『주석민법』 친족1" (2020), 한국사법행정학회
- 민유숙, "『주석민법』 친족2" (2020), 한국사법행정학회
- 윤진수, "『주해친족법』 제1권" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "『주해친족법』 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 한봉희, "가족법" (2013), 삼영사
- 김상용, "이혼 후의 양육자 및 친권자 결정에 있어서 민법이 가지는 몇가지 문제점", 사법행정, (428) (1996), 한국사법행정학회
- 김상용, "친권, 후견법 개정안에 대한 몇가지 의견", 법조 (1998)
- 김상용, "이혼 후의 공동친권―그 가능성과 한계", 판례월보, (332) (1998), 판례월보사
- 김유미, "이혼 시 친권의 개정방향", 가족법연구, 15(2) (2001)
- 민유숙, "2012년 민사(친족, 상속법) 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (432), pp.50~63 (2013), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 윤부찬, "친권 및 면접교섭의 변경사유로서 미성년자의 거소변경", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.1~30 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 윤석찬, "이혼 후의 공동양육권에 관한 고찰", 재판실무연구, X (2011), 비교법실무연구회, 박영사
- 이충은, "이혼 후 공동양육제도에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 14(2), pp.211~232 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이현재, "자의 최선의 이익에 관한 연구 : 미국을 중심으로", 석사, 법학, pp.2004
- 정윤주, "판례평석: 시티즌십의 관점에서 살펴본 대법원 2021. 9. 30. 선고 2021므12320, 12337 판결", 사법, 1(60), pp.465~493 (2022), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 최병조, "박병호환갑기념1" (1991)
- 최정인, "친권자 및 양육자의 지정·변경과 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 가사재판연구, Ⅱ (2011), 서울가정법원 가사재판연구회
- 최진섭, "이혼 후의 공동양육법제에 대한 입법론적 연구", 가족법연구, 24(3), pp.253~290 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 최진섭, "가정폭력과 친권: 이혼 후 친권자 지정과 관련하여 미국의 입법례를 중심으로", 법조, 56(9) (2007)
- Marsha Garrison, "U.S. Custody and Access Disputes: Continuity and Changes", 가족법연구, 27(3) (2013), 한국가족법학회
- "R v De Mannerville (1804) 5 East 221", ~
- "Shelley v. Westbrooke, 37 Eng. Rep. 850", ~
- "Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43S. Ct. 625, 67L. Ed. 1042(1923)", ~ (1923)
- Andrew Schepard, "Taking Children Seriously : Promoting Cooperative Custody After Divorce", Tex. L. Rev, 64, pp.687~ (1985)
- Robert Bauserman, "Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements; A Meta-Analytic Review", Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1) (2002)
- Christy M. Buchanan, "A Psychological Perspective on Shared Custody Arrangements", Wake Forest L. Rev, 43, pp.419~ (2008)
- Linda J. Lacey, "Mandatory Marriage “For the Sake of the Children”: A Feminist Reply to Elizabeth Scott", Tul. L. Rev, 66, pp.1435~ (1992)
- Linda R. Keenan, "Domestic Violence and Custody Litigation: The Need for Statutory Reform", Hofstra L. Rev, 13, pp.407~ (1985)
- D. Marianne Brower Blair, "Parent-Initiated Termination of Parental Rights: The Ultimate Weapon in Matrimonial Warfare", Tulsa L. J, 24, pp.299~ (1989)
- Mary Ann Mason, "Motherhood v. Equal Treatment", J. Fam. L, 29, pp.1~ (1990)
- Martha Fineman, "Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Changein Child Custody Decision making", Harv. L, 101, pp.727~ (1988)
- Trina Grillo, "The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women", Yale L. J, 100, pp.1545~ (1991)
- Elizabeth Scott, "Rethinking Joint Custody", Ohio St L. J, 45, pp.453~ (1984)
- S. Wolff, "Children Under Stress" (1981), Penguin
- J. B. Kelly, "Developing Beneficial Parenting Plan Models for Children Following Separation and Divorce", J. Am. Acad. Matrimonial Law, 19, pp.237~ (2004)
- Linda Nielsen, "Shared Parenting After Divorce: A Review of Shared Residential Parenting Research", Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 52
- Elizabeth Scott, "RETHINKING JOINT CUSTODY, Symposium: The Parent-Child Relationship and the Current Cycle of Family Law Reform", Ohio St. L. J, 45, pp.455~ (1984)
- J. Herbie Di Fonzo, "From the Rule of One to Shared Parenting : Custody Presumptions in Law and Policy", Fam. Ct. Rev, 52, pp.213~ (2014)
- "California Family Code[Cal. Fam. Code(West)", ~
- 小川富之, "婚姻解消と子どもの問題について", 近畿大学法学会, 61(1) (2013)