본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자녀보호의 관점에서 본 양육권 문제 ―영국과 미국의 법이 주는 시사점―

Child Custody Problems Focused on Protection of the Child ―Implications from English and American Law―

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In a parent and child relationship the physical custody of a child is main part of the parental responsibility and the most important and intimate matter concerning the welfare of the child. The physical custody of a child is included in the parental responsibility/right and held by both parents when the parents are married and the family is intact, but in case of the parents' divorce or when the family break apart or when someone who is not actually the parent takes care of the child the child custody problem becomes complicated. In these circumstances the content and the limits of the custody of the child and the parental responsibility/right is separated. The right of the custody is separated from the parental responsibility and the custodian of the child and the arrangements about the care and support of the child must be determined. English and American law have considered child's welfare by case law since 19th century and have established laws and solutions for child custody and child protection problem based on the child's welfare from 1920's. Through many cases, law reforms and studies for decades, English and American law have established several principles and statutes based on the ‘child's best interest principle’ about the child custody problems that can occur in diverse situations. So in this paper the law, cases and system of English and American law are studied to find implications for the Korean law and family court concerning child custody. These legal systems recognize parental responsibility as parents' duties which last as long as the child reaches majority irrelevant of the parents' divorce or family breakdown. As they find it that the joint parental responsibility of the parents is principle, they emphasize the importance of child custody when the parents separate or the child live with someone besides the parents. The matter of child custody should all be arranged under the ‘the best interest of the child’ principle, and they make it sure that the family court make an order for the arrangements and change of the child custody. The statutes and the family courts of these countries also determine the primary/actual physical custodian of the child and the rights and duties exclusive to the custodian explicitly so that dispute between parents or the custodian can be avoided or at least be minimized. They also recognize and guard the custody of non-parents or in loco parentis who have formed stable family with the child, for ‘the best interest of the child’. By these rules English and American legal systems protect the child and respect 'the best interest of the child' in the case of divorce, child born out of wedlock, step-parent's custody, death of custodian, child under court's guard or foster care, annulment of adoption etc.

Abstract

In a parent and child relationship the physical custody of a child is main part of the parental responsibility and the most important and intimate matter concerning the welfare of the child. The physical custody of a child is included in the parental responsibility/right and held by both parents when the parents are married and the family is intact, but in case of the parents' divorce or when the family break apart or when someone who is not actually the parent takes care of the child the child custody problem becomes complicated. In these circumstances the content and the limits of the custody of the child and the parental responsibility/right is separated. The right of the custody is separated from the parental responsibility and the custodian of the child and the arrangements about the care and support of the child must be determined. English and American law have considered child's welfare by case law since 19th century and have established laws and solutions for child custody and child protection problem based on the child's welfare from 1920's. Through many cases, law reforms and studies for decades, English and American law have established several principles and statutes based on the ‘child's best interest principle’ about the child custody problems that can occur in diverse situations. So in this paper the law, cases and system of English and American law are studied to find implications for the Korean law and family court concerning child custody. These legal systems recognize parental responsibility as parents' duties which last as long as the child reaches majority irrelevant of the parents' divorce or family breakdown. As they find it that the joint parental responsibility of the parents is principle, they emphasize the importance of child custody when the parents separate or the child live with someone besides the parents. The matter of child custody should all be arranged under the ‘the best interest of the child’ principle, and they make it sure that the family court make an order for the arrangements and change of the child custody. The statutes and the family courts of these countries also determine the primary/actual physical custodian of the child and the rights and duties exclusive to the custodian explicitly so that dispute between parents or the custodian can be avoided or at least be minimized. They also recognize and guard the custody of non-parents or in loco parentis who have formed stable family with the child, for ‘the best interest of the child’. By these rules English and American legal systems protect the child and respect 'the best interest of the child' in the case of divorce, child born out of wedlock, step-parent's custody, death of custodian, child under court's guard or foster care, annulment of adoption etc.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 김유미, "자녀복리의 관점에서 본 한국 친권법: 특히 신상에 관한 효력의 검토를 중심으 로", 박사, pp.1995
  2. 김주수, "친족상속법", 법문사
  3. 김상용, "소위 친권행사자론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 가족법연구, (11) (1997)
  4. 양수산, "친권자와 친권행사자론", 가족법연구, (10) (1996)
  5. 이은정, "비친권자의 양육권", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.165~186 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  6. 이화숙, "자의 최대의 이익과 현행친권제도", 가족법연구, (2) (1988), 한국가족법학회
  7. 이화숙, "미국 친자관계법의 오늘과 내일", 가족법연구, (11) (1997), 한국가족법학회
  8. 조경애, "친양자 제도의 개선방향(사례를 중심으로)", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.305~336 (2008), 한국가족법학회
  9. 최진섭, "계가족의 법률관계에 대한 외국법의 동향분석", 통일문제와 국제관계, (8) (1997), 인천대학교평화통일연구소
  10. 최진섭, "이혼 후의 공동양육법제에 대한 입법론적 연구", 가족법연구, 24(3), pp.253~290 (2010), 한국가족법학회
  11. 최진섭, "이혼배우자의 자녀양육에 관한 법제 연구", 박사, pp.1990
  12. Tommie J. Mamner, "현대사회와 아동양육" (2002), 교육과학사
  13. Abrams, "Children and the Law 3rd ed", pp.2007, Thomson
  14. "Black's Law Dictionary 8th ed" (2005), Thomson
  15. Bradshaw, "Absent fathers" (1999), Routledge
  16. Buckland, "Roman Law and Common Law 2nd ed" (1965), Cambridge
  17. Law's Perceptions of “ Family” after Divorce, in Divorce Reform at the Crossroads, "Chambers", ~ (1990)
  18. Cooper, Ariana S, "Free exercise claims in custody battles: Is heightened scrutiny required post-Smith", Colum. L. Rev, (108) (2008)
  19. Cretney, "Family law in the twentieth century" (2005), Oxford University Press
  20. Douglas, Emily M, "Mending broken families : social policies for divorced families : how effective are they" (2006), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  21. Fisher, Susan M, "Adopted Children and Custody Arrangements, in The scientific basis of child custody decisions" (1999), Wiley
  22. Galatzer-Levy, Robert, "The scientific basis of child custody decisions" (1999), Wiley
  23. Gardner, Richard A, "Family Evaluation in Child Custody Litigation" (1982), Creative Therapeutics
  24. Hans, Jason D, "Stepparenting After Divorce: Stepparents' Legal Position Regarding Custody, Acess, and Support, Family Relations", Families and the Law, 51(4) (2002)
  25. Harris, "Family Law 4th ed" (2010), Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
  26. Harry D. Krause, "Family Law 6th ed" (2007), Thomson West
  27. Jana B. Singer, "A dissent on joint custody", Md. L. Rev, 47(겨울) (1988)
  28. Joseph Goldstein, "The Best Interest of the Child: the Least Detrimental Alternative" (1996), Free Press
  29. Linda D, "Child custody practice and procedure", pp.2004, Thomson
  30. Lowe, "Bromley's Family Law, 10th ed" (2007), Oxford
  31. Masson, "Cretney - Principles of family law 8th ed" (2008), Sweet & Maxwell
  32. Michael Grossberg, "Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in the Nineteenth Century America" (1985), The University of North Carolina Press
  33. Solangel Moldonado, "Beyond Economic Fatherhood: Encouraging Divorced Fathers to Parent", U. Pa. L. Rev, (153) (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)