離婚에 있어 親權 및 養育責任問題에 대한 새로운 접근 - ‘養育權’의 法定化 논의를 위하여 -
A Fresh Approach on the Parental Authority and the Responsibility of Rearing Children —For the Enactment of ‘Authority of Rearing’ Provision—
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article makes a study of a fresh approach on the parental authority and the responsibility of rearing children. In recent Korean society as the divorce increases, the minors are confronted with various dangers. Therefore in order to safeguard the children, we should make the better ‘Domestic Relations Law’ and ‘Child Welfare Law’. Because of parents' divorce, their children are left in dangerous circumstances. In this paper I want to examine the methods how to safeguard their minor sons and daughters through the enacted Civil law and the existing Civil law, judicial precedents. In view of so far achieved that I examine the origin and development of Korean Civil Law(especially ‘Domestic Relations Law’), ‘Parental authority’ and ‘Authority of Rearing’ to the minority took a serious view of paternal authority. The First enacted Korean Civil Law that has been in operation on 1st Jan. 1960, prescribed as follows: “A child who is a minor shall be subject to the parental power of his or her father with whom the child is residing.”(Article 909①); “In case an agreement has not been made on matters concerning fostering and education of the children born between the parties, the father is responsible for fostering and education of their children.”(Article 837①). But in accordance with the trend of the contemporary times--that is to say “equal rights for father and mother, equality of the both sexes, generalization of divorce, deepening in the study of children etc.”, I make a decision that the ‘Authority of Rearing’ Provision should be prescribed in the ‘Domestic Relations Law’ for the relative intensification of the right of ‘Authority of Rearing’.
Abstract
This article makes a study of a fresh approach on the parental authority and the responsibility of rearing children. In recent Korean society as the divorce increases, the minors are confronted with various dangers. Therefore in order to safeguard the children, we should make the better ‘Domestic Relations Law’ and ‘Child Welfare Law’. Because of parents' divorce, their children are left in dangerous circumstances. In this paper I want to examine the methods how to safeguard their minor sons and daughters through the enacted Civil law and the existing Civil law, judicial precedents. In view of so far achieved that I examine the origin and development of Korean Civil Law(especially ‘Domestic Relations Law’), ‘Parental authority’ and ‘Authority of Rearing’ to the minority took a serious view of paternal authority. The First enacted Korean Civil Law that has been in operation on 1st Jan. 1960, prescribed as follows: “A child who is a minor shall be subject to the parental power of his or her father with whom the child is residing.”(Article 909①); “In case an agreement has not been made on matters concerning fostering and education of the children born between the parties, the father is responsible for fostering and education of their children.”(Article 837①). But in accordance with the trend of the contemporary times--that is to say “equal rights for father and mother, equality of the both sexes, generalization of divorce, deepening in the study of children etc.”, I make a decision that the ‘Authority of Rearing’ Provision should be prescribed in the ‘Domestic Relations Law’ for the relative intensification of the right of ‘Authority of Rearing’.
참고문헌 (31)
- 民議院法制司法委員會 民法案審議小委員會, "民法案審議錄" (1957)
- 鄭光鉉, "韓國家族法硏究(附錄編 親族相續法立法資料)" (1967), 서울대학교출판부
- 2015년 혼인이혼통계조사, "통계청", ~ (2015)
- 여성가족부, "한부모가족실태조사(2012) 통계자료", ~ (2012)
- 金疇洙, "親族·相續法" (2013), 法文社
- 金容漢, "新親族相續法論" (2002), 박영사
- 朴秉濠, "家族法" (1999), 방송통신대 출판부
- 윤진수, "주해가족법(제1권)" (2015), 박영사
- 김상용, "가족법연구Ⅱ" (2006), 법문사
- 민경환, "성격심리학" (2014), 법문사
- 신명희, "발달심리학" (2013), 학지사
- 송명자, "발달심리학" (2008), 학지사
- 조은숙, "현대인의 정신건강" (2007), 법문사
- 권재문, "자녀의 복리 원칙의 의미에 대한 윤리적 접근", 가족법연구, 29(2), pp.35~70 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 권재문, "친권의 제한·정지 제도 도입을 위한 검토사항", 가족법연구, 28(1)통권 : 49, pp.31~60 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 김유미, "자녀복리원칙에 관한 연구", 울산대사회과학논집, 10(1) (2000)
- 朴相宣, "親權에 관한 諸問題", 裁判資料, 62 (1993), 법원행정처
- 백주연, "가정법원50주년기념 논문집" (2013), 서울가정법원
- 서정우, "민사판례연구Ⅸ" (1992), 박영사
- 윤진수, "부모의 자녀 치료거부 문제 해결을위한 입법론", 법조, 62(5), pp.40~98 (2013), 법조협회
- 이은정, "친권 제한의 유연화 —신분적 효력을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.217~244 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 이종길, "가정의 해체와 아동복지에 대한 일검토", 가족법연구, (14) (2000)
- 이종길, "中國의 家族關係保護를 위한 婚姻法制에 대한 檢討", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.151~182 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 李和淑, "子의 最大利益과 現行 親權制度", 家族法硏究, (2) (1988)
- 이화숙, "현행친권법상 자녀의 이익과 부모의 책임", 정신건강연구, 15 (1996), 한양대학교정신건강연구소
- Stephen J. Bahr, "Trends in Child Custody Awards: Has the Removal of Maternal Preference Made a Difference?", Family Law Quarterly, 28(2) (1994)
- Reine Frank, "친권법의 기본문제", 법학, 37(3·4) (1996), 서울대법학연구소
- 佐藤隆夫, "離婚と子どもの人權" (1988), 日本評論社
- 矢野篤, "離婚法における‘子の 權利’の現狀と課題", 私法(日本私法學會), (63) (2001), 有斐閣
- 矢野篤, "アメリカ離婚法における‘子の最良の利益’の意義", 比較法硏究, (57)
- 若林昌子, "判決に從わずに子む監護している父への親權者變更", 民商, 125(1) (2001)
